Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

'Polarised' debate on gender recognition is harming UK, says equalities chief

134 replies

MondayYogurt · 08/08/2020 20:45

Observer article www.theguardian.com/society/2020/aug/08/polarised-debate-on-gender-recognition-is-harming-uk-says-equalities-chief

The departing chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission has said the polarising debate around transgender rights will be damaging to the country if it continues.
In his final interview, David Isaac, who left his position on Saturday after more than four years in post, urged supporters and opponents of gender self-identification to recognise that they had much in common.

OP posts:
Portnlemon · 09/08/2020 21:32

I don't think that's strictly true Maya. We seem to have gone through a slow process of immersion in Stonewall policy (for short hand purposes) which has now reached a saturation point. And those that were early critics in senior positions became casualties of the a vicious policing at it's peak, with the more circumspect surviving. People are learning more about this now and more balanced people are emerging, it's such an outlandish and anti reality approach to life that it will recede and more constructive people will take the lead but it's cyclical as all trends are and it's likely to take 5 years to recede fully. I don't think the position is fixed.

TehBewilderness · 09/08/2020 21:25

@MForstater

David Isaac was chair of Stonewall before the 2015 inclusion of T.

It seems like he is mildly gender critical but was unwilling or unable to be effective in that in any kind of perceptible way.

Ditto Sam Smethers at Fawcett, Sophie Walker at WEP. Presumably every senior leader of every organisation that isn't actively shouting "TWAW" . Its not that these individuals are particularly cowardly, but it is impossible for some combination of reasons (funding ? fear of own young staff? long term careerism? govt/GEO pressure?) for people to get to the top of these organisations and be openly and effectively gender critical.

It is almost always 90% about the money when organizations fail in this fashion.
DialSquare · 09/08/2020 21:22

Gottalife seems to have GC views to me.

"Sexuality is nothing to do with transgenderism." I agree.

"Well it is impossible to know how it feels to be ANY other person, man or woman, you only know how it feels to be yourself. Exactly. So how does a male who feels like himself become a woman?

MForstater · 09/08/2020 21:19

David Isaac was chair of Stonewall before the 2015 inclusion of T.

It seems like he is mildly gender critical but was unwilling or unable to be effective in that in any kind of perceptible way.

Ditto Sam Smethers at Fawcett, Sophie Walker at WEP. Presumably every senior leader of every organisation that isn't actively shouting "TWAW" . Its not that these individuals are particularly cowardly, but it is impossible for some combination of reasons (funding ? fear of own young staff? long term careerism? govt/GEO pressure?) for people to get to the top of these organisations and be openly and effectively gender critical.

Gottalife · 09/08/2020 21:12

Sexuallity has nothing to do with transgenderism. I never mentioned your dental hygienist. Notice I said COULD BE with a few hypothetical examples.

OldCrone · 09/08/2020 20:57

Well it is impossible to know how it feels to be ANY other person, man or woman, you only know how it feels to be yourself. And the gender you feel yourself to be.

What does it feel like to feel yourself to be a gender?

midgebabe · 09/08/2020 20:43

Well I guess anyone meeting me would have no idea that I identified as a boy for many years
I doubt they noticed at the time either.

Isn't that exactly the point? It's an internal thing that has no objective measurable effect

Gurufloof · 09/08/2020 20:34

Think of all the people you meet, work or socialise with. It could be your doctor or dentist or optician or the supermarket checkout worker. Any
one of them could have a trans history but they are not going to tell you or anyone. That is their private business. That is stealth

What do you mean by a trans history?

You trying to say my dental hygienist might not be the sex I assume? Cos I'm damn sure what sex i see is true. And like most in the UK i see different drs each time I go, but I can tell which sex they are without much trouble.

Or by trans history you mean they Identify as maybe bi or lesbian? In which case that's none of my business as is my sexual history no ones business.

Gottalife · 09/08/2020 20:26

@Kit19

Gender is a social construct made up of performative stereotypes. I’ve had my hair to my waist & worn high heels, and equally it’s been an inch long and I’ve worn a suit. Still a woman.

It is literally impossible for any man to know how it feels to be a woman. They can only imagine what it feels like same as I can only imagine what it feels like to be a man. I can’t ever know because I’m not a man

Well it is impossible to know how it feels to be ANY other person, man or woman, you only know how it feels to be yourself. And the gender you feel yourself to be.
OldCrone · 09/08/2020 20:24

Think of all the people you meet, work or socialise with. It could be your doctor or dentist or optician or the supermarket checkout worker. Any one of them could have a trans history but they are not going to tell you or anyone. That is their private business. That is stealth.

If it's my doctor, it's not just their private business. If I ask for a female doctor to perform an intimate examination, I expect that doctor to actually be female, not a man who wants to be a woman. If such a doctor turned out to be male, I wouldn't view this as 'stealth', I would view it as fraud, or possibly sexual assault.

highame · 09/08/2020 20:13

@Ereshkigalangcleg I trust you are right, people do don't they

Kit19 · 09/08/2020 20:08

Given the breadth of the trans umbrella I’m certain that I have for example come across men who cross dress in private. I don’t give af about that - what they do in private is up to them as is what they do in public providing they’re not trying to access single sex spaces

Gottalife · 09/08/2020 20:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NearlyGranny · 09/08/2020 19:58

I do think an awful lot of what is being called 'gender' atm is just personality, to be honest. What you like doing, how you feel about the world, the friends you choose, the books you read, the hobbies you pursue, the career you follow, your sexual orientation... None of that adds up to 'gender' does it?

When they start labelling 100+ different genders you have to know it's personality, really. We're all different individuals. Why put labels on it?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/08/2020 19:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/08/2020 19:28

The more worrying aspect is that he was appointed given his previous involvement with Stonewall - as single issue campaign is not a qualification for overseeing equality for all.

I agree.

Gottalife · 09/08/2020 19:25

@Gurufloof

In practice a lot of the exceptions can only be enforced by an intrusive physical examination and all the outrage that could cause. Hence there are a lot of "stealth" trans people Please do explain the stealth part. I'm failing in understanding that bit.
Think of all the people you meet, work or socialise with. It could be your doctor or dentist or optician or the supermarket checkout worker. Any one of them could have a trans history but they are not going to tell you or anyone. That is their private business. That is stealth.
EmpressJKRowlingSpartacus · 09/08/2020 19:25

However, as nobody can see your internal identity, it isn’t relevant to equalities law.

Well, except Layla Moran, with her ability to see souls. But that would depend on her being present at the time.

stumbledin · 09/08/2020 19:08

Just thought that if this had been the Guardian rather than the Observer whether they would have even included the observation that some women's groups have concerns about proposed changes to the GRA!

Not sure if there is a longer version of this interview elsewhere but if not this man comes over as being totally clueless.

But sometimes I think this is why peoplel ike this get jobs like this. They just dont understand so just sail through.

The more worrying aspect is that he was appointed given his previous involvement with Stonewall - as single issue campaign is not a qualification for overseeing equality for all.

zanahoria · 09/08/2020 17:10

Debate is never a problem

Suppressing debate is

Kit19 · 09/08/2020 17:05

Gender is a social construct made up of performative stereotypes. I’ve had my hair to my waist & worn high heels, and equally it’s been an inch long and I’ve worn a suit. Still a woman.

It is literally impossible for any man to know how it feels to be a woman. They can only imagine what it feels like same as I can only imagine what it feels like to be a man. I can’t ever know because I’m not a man

AvocadoBathroom · 09/08/2020 16:54

By "in common" does he mean "Share your space and shut your mouth." ?

merrymouse · 09/08/2020 16:50

gender is the true identity.

Some people describe their identity in terms of gender.

However, as nobody can see your internal identity, it isn’t relevant to equalities law. People experience prejudice because of structural exclusion and the perceptions of others, not their own sense of self.

Gurufloof · 09/08/2020 16:43

In practice a lot of the exceptions can only be enforced by an intrusive physical examination and all the outrage that could cause. Hence there are a lot of "stealth" trans people
Please do explain the stealth part. I'm failing in understanding that bit.

GingerPCatt · 09/08/2020 16:33

Is overheated grumpy person a gender? Cause that is my true identity at the moment.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread