Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

More places asking me to state my prounouns. WWYD?

182 replies

GennyCrabby · 08/08/2020 09:44

For obvious reasons I don't want to state my pronouns. I have an obviously female name and woman figure and if somebody accidentally "misgendered" me I'd be happy to correct them no hard feelings.

I'm finding in this strange year that more and more places online are asking for prounouns. Anybody else experiencing this? So far it's been a request, and I've been able to just ignore it.

The requests at the beginning of zoom calls are getting more emphatic and less like a choice Hmm. I'm working with different people so it could be that, but my sense is more and more that I'm being one of the fewer and fewer in the call(s) who don't change my name to include my pronouns I stand out more and more as GC. For somebody who is deliberately not "out" it's getting very uncomfortable.

I requested to joined a Facebook group last night. This morning I woke up to an "introduce yourself!" post that instructed (not requested) us to declare our pronouns. I've ignored that bit, but the way it was phrased it's obvious I have ignored it and i wonder if I'm going to be prompted again. If pushed I think I'll go the "my prounouns are sex based" or "oh yeah sure I'm female Smile" route or drop the admin a PM saying I am uncomfortable stating my pronouns and hope they leave it as that.

The second is more delicate, because it's a session for my hobby that I want to go to that is being run by a trans man. I'm very happy to use their preferred pronouns and don't wish in the slightest to do or say anything against them - I am after all despite what many would claim, not transphobic, I wish him peace and he's a big deal in this field, I'd love to learn from him. Equally, I feel strongly enough about my own rights and views that I just don't want to state my pronouns. Help! How on earth would you handle this delicately and with grace?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Roswellconspiracy · 10/08/2020 12:01

oh don't worry I know. No one does anything anymore unless theres a camera involved

After all I mean a night crew secretly installing equipment in a dark.locked building with no one around to see wont get you likes on face book will it. Much better to make your logo a rainbow so you can elevate your social media status.

So needy...

SerendipityJane · 10/08/2020 11:57

As previous posters have said if they cared about inclusion

Didn't you know that it's terribly unfair to judge organisations (and people) on what they do in 2020 ? It's so exclusive. The only way to know for sure is to read to what they print. That's where the truth lies. In words, not deeds.

If you're unsure, look at most religions. They've pretty much perfected the essential art of "do as we say, not as we do".

Roswellconspiracy · 10/08/2020 11:50

Thankfully I've not been subject to this yet. As previous posters have said if they cared about inclusion there are many ways they could make workplaces more inclusive that don't involve subjecting women to sexism by making their sex known to those they are emailing etc to. This does not benefit women.

And let's face it we all have enough responsibilities. At work. At home. Our families etc I certainly don't consent to being held responsible for the wellbeing and acceptance of strangers or other people. Do what you need to get by and be happy but don't involve the rest if us in it. Thats something we weren't asked and haven't agreed to.

I'm.a crap liar. Its written all over face and it makes me feel really bad. I cant do it. And I wont.

SerendipityJane · 10/08/2020 11:43

@drspouse

I have wondered if I should say "make sure you check everyone's role in a meeting, it's all too common to assume women are in admin roles, and ask what would make them comfortable too - don't boast about how much childcare you've done during the pandemic when we all know your wife isn't working."
Keep 'em coming Smile
drspouse · 10/08/2020 11:42

I have wondered if I should say "make sure you check everyone's role in a meeting, it's all too common to assume women are in admin roles, and ask what would make them comfortable too - don't boast about how much childcare you've done during the pandemic when we all know your wife isn't working."

SerendipityJane · 10/08/2020 11:25

@Kit19

Maybe next time someone starts on about pronouns at the beginning of a meeting to be inclusive say

“Oh brilliant! Can I add in some other things about being inclusive? I note we have no video subtitles for people with hearing loss which seems rather discriminatory plus ground rules don’t seem to include announcing our names before speaking for people with sight loss. This seems disappintingly exclusionary to me”

They’re not going to have any come back then if you say you believe pronouns are exclusionary for those who may not wish to out themselves yet

Someone's getting it Smile

maybe someone should be signing for hard of hearing participants ? Otherwise it's hardly inclusive.

Obviously by now, people with colour blindness need to be considered. So definitely ask the HR bods for guidance on what colour clothing is appropriate. (Keep the fact you can turn the colour off in software to yourself - it's far too sensible for the Walking Woke).

drspouse · 10/08/2020 11:23

Gender isn’t a protected anything. Only by the laws of twitter.
I'm aware of this, but playing dumb (are we being asked to state whether we are undergoing gender reassignment? Or are you interested in my sex?) may help them to work out what they actually want, in their own mind, and how far they are prepared to take it.

As has been pointed out before, it's not helpful to someone who has considering gender reassignment but isn't out at work, either.

SerenityNowwwww · 10/08/2020 11:13

@SerendipityJane

It’s the new thing. Companies are being advised to be ‘inclusive’ ...

... as long as it doesn't cost anything. Heaven forfend they improve their physical access or provide decent disabled toilet facilities. In fact a lot of this trans shit is removing said facilities. Luckily the disabled have been shat on for so long they're used to it. It would have been a different story if men lost their facilities.

Anyway, as you were.

👆 this. I think we have spoken before about this.
SerenityNowwwww · 10/08/2020 11:12

@drspouse

I would ask (especially if UK based) if we have to state all our other protected characteristics? Because you aren't comfortable stating your religion, sexual orientation, and maternity status the first time you meet someone.
Gender isn’t a protected anything. Only by the laws of twitter.
SerendipityJane · 10/08/2020 11:11

It’s the new thing. Companies are being advised to be ‘inclusive’ ...

... as long as it doesn't cost anything. Heaven forfend they improve their physical access or provide decent disabled toilet facilities. In fact a lot of this trans shit is removing said facilities. Luckily the disabled have been shat on for so long they're used to it. It would have been a different story if men lost their facilities.

Anyway, as you were.

drspouse · 10/08/2020 11:10

I would ask (especially if UK based) if we have to state all our other protected characteristics? Because you aren't comfortable stating your religion, sexual orientation, and maternity status the first time you meet someone.

SerenityNowwwww · 10/08/2020 11:10

I’m too old for this crap. I didn’t haul my arse through a sexist industry to have it all snatched away for younger women.

SerendipityJane · 10/08/2020 11:05

I can start to see how the war is being lost, with the succession of earnest posts taking my comment about hate crime as serious ... it was a joke (ffs). If people start taking this botty water seriously then the lunatics will be running the asylum. And given they are also running the country, I'm worried they may not be able to cope.

At every turn nonsense like this needs to be treated as nonsense. Either explicitly - by calling it out as bollocks. Or implicitly by a reductio ad absurbem and taking it more seriously than the Rope-a-wokes themselves.

Remember you only have to engineer a situation where the Wokefinder General accuses you of "not taking it seriously and it's game over. So just do what you can.

Kit19 · 10/08/2020 10:58

Maybe next time someone starts on about pronouns at the beginning of a meeting to be inclusive say

“Oh brilliant! Can I add in some other things about being inclusive? I note we have no video subtitles for people with hearing loss which seems rather discriminatory plus ground rules don’t seem to include announcing our names before speaking for people with sight loss. This seems disappintingly exclusionary to me”

They’re not going to have any come back then if you say you believe pronouns are exclusionary for those who may not wish to out themselves yet

SerenityNowwwww · 10/08/2020 10:52

It’s the new thing. Companies are being advised to be ‘inclusive’ - which doesn’t seem to mean in such a case that they include subtitles for video calls for those hard of hearing, or ask people to please announce their name before speaking for the the benefit of the visually impaired.

Funny that.

RuffleCrow · 10/08/2020 10:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Queenoftheashes · 10/08/2020 10:47

I am also wondering why we need this ?
Can’t you put Ms or whatever? If your title is arbitrary you’d just be referred to as them?
We have titles we choose, why do we need to start “owning” our pronouns which people only use if they’re the type of prick to refer to themselves in third person?? Like disco stu.

Sittinonthefloor · 10/08/2020 06:48

First - ignore
Second - ignore, + confusion
Third - “oh, okay, if anyone is unsure what to use if they are discussing me, maybe they could ask me privately?”
Fourth - if anyone does ask you (which would be incredibly rude) give a straight faced “I am a woman”.

NotBadConsidering · 10/08/2020 05:02

I think apostasy is a more fitting definition.

FWRLurker · 10/08/2020 03:41

What crime is being committed?

Heresies, obviously.

NotBadConsidering · 10/08/2020 03:00

@LemonadeAndDaisyChains

It's not a hate crime to genuinely forget, fit goodness sake. Refusing to because "I'm not playing that game" "I'll call you what I like" attitude maybe more so
For this to be a hate crime, there needs to be a crime committed that police rule is motivated by hate. What crime is being committed?
TehBewilderness · 10/08/2020 00:36

The only place I have ever been mistaken for a man is on the internet.

I have never understood why random men think it is acceptable to inform random women of their opinion. I have seen it thousands of times so I know it is a social custom similar to being told to smile but I confess I find it intrusive.

LemonadeAndDaisyChains · 10/08/2020 00:18

Forgot to add I still lived too - can see why it is harder for trans people if that;s the kind of bollocks biological women get just walking about.

LemonadeAndDaisyChains · 10/08/2020 00:16

As a teen I was missexed on a few occasions - the crew cut, men’s jeans and DMs could have been the cause. Possibly not misgendered as my outer appearance may have been seen to be ‘masculine’ to anyone over the age of 40, but to younger people, I was Annie Bloody Lennox, obviously.I lived.

Meh - presumably because you're biologically a woman, I am too?
I was walking to the train station last year, some lass with her mate passing by me said "you look like a man"
No idea what that was about, maybe the no make up and my raincoat up around my ears lol, however how that makes me a man is anyone's guess Grin
I'm in my 40s.

Violetparis · 09/08/2020 23:02

If you're happy to use trans people's preferred pronouns but not declare your own, you could say just that, that you don't have any preferred pronouns for yourself but you are happy to refer to anyone with whatever pronouns they choose. This is my plan if I my work goes down this route and I think it's entirely reasonable.