Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

It gets worse - a new, fresh hell

131 replies

WootMoggie · 28/07/2020 07:17

Medical paper in which it is argued that non-binary children should be given puberty blockers FOR LIFE
^
"In this article, we analyse the novel case of Phoenix, a non-binary adult requesting ongoing puberty suppression (OPS) to permanently prevent the development of secondary sex characteristics, as a way of affirming their gender identity. We argue that (1) the aim of OPS is consistent with the proper goals of medicine to promote well-being, and therefore could ethically be offered to non-binary adults in principle;"

"Phoenix, 18, was assigned female at birth but has identified as gender non-binary (not entirely/exclusively male or female) since age 5."
^

  • and so it begins.

Lord help us keep these clinicians away from our families. Puberty is a scary thing, but this line of thinking is essentially redefining it as optional.

jme.bmj.com/content/early/2020/07/24/medethics-2019-106012

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
OldCrone · 31/07/2020 22:28

Pre-pubertal bodies are not “genderless” or sexless, they are children’s bodies which are male or female. Phoenix wants a female child’s body forever. Is that gender dysphoria or is it fear of what comes with an adult body?

From the paper:

Phoenix’s new doctor feels that OPS is still too physically risky, especially with regard to bone health, and wonders if Phoenix has underlying psychological issues about not wanting to grow up.

Phoenix tells the psychologist that they highly value having a body that matches their gender identity. Alternative options, including low-dose testosterone, menstrual suppression and future ‘top’ surgery, are unacceptable to Phoenix because they do not believe these alternatives would accurately reflect their non-binary gender identity.

Phoenix's 'gender identity' appears to be 'child'.

BatShite · 31/07/2020 22:19

Surprised this hasn't been a 'thing' earlier, certainly benefits one seemingly powerful group of people (men) to keep 'adults' at a prepubescent state while 'legal' Hmm

I know that inference is not allowed generally, but given the topic..its not possible not to say here.

Alabamawhirly1 · 31/07/2020 18:19

Just out of interest does anyone know the success rate of getting pregnant from frozen sperm.

It's just, it can take quite a few attempts to get pregnant naturally. So surely even if you manage to get some sperm, and save a few shots, there's no guarantee that you'll actually sucssesful make a baby with it.

Or are they expecting any future partners to go through invasive egg harvesting and embreo implantation with lots of potential side effects to the woman. At the same time linning the pockets of the fertility clinics.

All this deliberate destruction of fertility and fertility preservation is creating a very lucrative industry.

BaseDrops · 31/07/2020 16:38

Different meds as well. So definitely nothing you could draw expected results from.

BaseDrops · 31/07/2020 16:36

I would imagine that the development of male secondary sex characteristics when off cross sex hormones and anti-androgens is a very individual experience, both for how much happens and ability to tolerate it.

OneEpisode · 31/07/2020 16:33

Thank you Base, I clearly lose my English comprehension marks there..
So quite short periods of meds? And only half regained fertility..

BaseDrops · 31/07/2020 16:29

One of the patients who elected to preserve their sperm after beginning therapy had been taking the drug Lupron—a sex hormone blocker that halts puberty when taken in adolescence—for six months. She elected to stop taking Lupron to attempt sperm cryopreservation. successful after 5 months.

The other was not successful after 4 months.
This patient had been taking estradiol and spironolactone for more than two years. Four months after stopping treatment, she was still unable to produce viable sperm, and at that point, she decided to stop trying for fertility preservation and proceeded with gender reassignment surgery.

highame · 31/07/2020 15:40

Valli-Pulaski said. "If you have any data, it's important to share so that patients, researchers and clinicians can learn from it."

?????? stable door ?????

OneEpisode · 31/07/2020 13:47

*BaseDrops” I only read the article you linked, so I don’t know how long these were on meds, and how long they were off meds, but one of the two produced viable sperm?

And right at the end the transition supportive doctor: "Right now, there's not much information available about fertility preservation for transgender patients,"

NotBadConsidering · 31/07/2020 11:46

BaseDrops

Excellent point well made.

BaseDrops · 31/07/2020 11:41

I can’t follow the logic that results in the conclusion that a non-binary identity = pre-pubertal body. I can understand that it could mean an adult body with a combination of male and female characteristics, or androgynous adult female body with say a mastectomy and hysterectomy or ovary removal or a male body with surgery to create an androgynous look like facial changes, removal of male pattern body/facial hair and shaved Adam’s apple.

This is none of those. Long term puberty suppression with no cross sex hormones or surgery will result in a pre-pubertal brain and body with at least expected adult height if not taller. Pre-pubertal bodies are not “genderless” or sexless, they are children’s bodies which are male or female. Phoenix wants a female child’s body forever. Is that gender dysphoria or is it fear of what comes with an adult body?

BaseDrops · 31/07/2020 10:47

medicalxpress.com/news/2019-08-transgender-women-case-sperm-production.amp

This is interesting as it discusses two people who stopped different drugs to try to achieve stored sperm for fertility preservation.

NearlyGranny · 31/07/2020 08:48

It's hard to credit that we all live in a society that permits, encourages and celebrates maiming children, though of course it has happened and still happens elsewhere - foot-binding, FGM ..... It's even harder to credit that anyone speaking out even to question this goes straight to the pillory, potentially losing their career and reputation.

We are going to be rudely awoken from our woke state by a landslide of grief, fury and lengthy, expensive litigation.

As a mother who has had her 21 yo turn on her and demand "Why did you let me DO that?" (at the adult age of 19!) I can see it shambling over the hill out of the mist.

PasstheBucket89 · 30/07/2020 23:42

Its scary how much that mirrors Athlete A/Larry Nassar.

BaseDrops · 30/07/2020 19:47

@OldCrone

I assume the adult clinic does not give puberty blockers as a treatment option, for the obvious reason that their patients would (normally) be passed puberty. Their treatment options are, I assume, cross-sex hormones and surgery.

Puberty blockers, also called hormone blockers, are also necessary for adults who transition if they haven't had their sexual organs surgically removed, in order to stop them producing their natural sex hormones.

I read up on this a while ago. Adults who have blockers with cross sex hormones are rarely female. Testosterone does a lot to female bodies so it’s not usual to continue to block puberty. It is usual to continue to take blockers if male and still have your testes because male puberty will kick in and bring the facial and body changes with it.

My own theory is this difference is why it is rare for males to detransition and why we are seeing an increase in female detransitioners. The girls brains go through puberty even with testosterone, the boys brains are puberty blocked.

AntsInPenzance · 30/07/2020 12:49

Someone should tell these people that children are not assigned male or female at birth - sex is determined at conception.

OldCrone · 30/07/2020 12:43

I assume the adult clinic does not give puberty blockers as a treatment option, for the obvious reason that their patients would (normally) be passed puberty. Their treatment options are, I assume, cross-sex hormones and surgery.

Puberty blockers, also called hormone blockers, are also necessary for adults who transition if they haven't had their sexual organs surgically removed, in order to stop them producing their natural sex hormones.

ThePurported · 30/07/2020 12:42

The UK seems to be on-trend towards stopping this but America is going full Dr Frankenstein on younger and younger children, for anyone with the $$$.

Yup. And I'm sure some parents in the FB group discussed in this thread by 4th Wave Now would love to have a Peter Pan child to "complete the set", as one of them put it:

mobile.twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1203412783066501120

"THREAD: Families with multiple trans kids.

New leaked post (dated 4 days ago) from the affirming-parent Facebook group. Contrary to the original poster's conjecture ("rare breed"), a whole slew have 2, 3 or more trans kids."

Ereshkigalangcleg · 30/07/2020 12:10

It does definitely seem like a bit of a conveyor belt.

PearPickingPorky · 29/07/2020 21:59

Something horrifying just occurred to me about the Tavistock GIDS puberty blockers experiment.

We know 50% of children referred there start blockers. We know that virtually ALL of those who start blockers progress onto cross-sex hormones. None desist. GIDS have admitted that.

But, we also know that GIDS does not treat anyone over the age of 17, and I think 17 (and 16?) year olds can push for referral straight to the adult clinic waiting list.

I assume the adult clinic does not give puberty blockers as a treatment option, for the obvious reason that their patients would (normally) be passed puberty. Their treatment options are, I assume, cross-sex hormones and surgery.

So that suggests to me that children who have had their puberty blockers don't really have any choice but to have either cross-sex hormones or/and surgery. If blockers are not to be prescribed for adults, then the children (with impaired cognitive function) would be given the choice of cross-sex hormones/surgery or nothing (ie desistance) surely? And desisting won't feel like an option to someone in a suspended state of child-ness.

If I'm wrong on that, then the only other option is that there are ALREADY adults in the UK who are still on blockers.

Someone tell me I'm wrong.

Because the only other option is desisting (which GIDS say none do), or hormones and surgery. And if hormones and surgery are the only options given to puberty blocked "adults" then no wonder so many young women are finding themselves post-surgery and wondering how the fuck they got there.

NeurotrashWarrior · 29/07/2020 07:47

There's a researcher in Scotland who has looked at the effects on sheep brains, as apparently sheep brains are the closest in terms of organisation / puberty and various things to humans.

The effects aren't minimal and he's also looked at how there are differences in terms of impact on males and females, with (as usual) still some more research on females to be done.

SetYourselfOnFire · 29/07/2020 04:48

Incredibly dystopian.

The UK seems to be on-trend towards stopping this but America is going full Dr Frankenstein on younger and younger children, for anyone with the $$$.

OldCrone · 28/07/2020 22:32

A fair amount is known about what happens to boys who don't go through puberty because of the castrati - boys who were castrated before puberty to preserve their singing voices.

Not going through puberty meant that they grew very tall, and they also often suffered from osteoporosis and curvature of the spine.

We don't know what happens to girls who don't go through puberty, because that 'experiment' is only just beginning.

OneEpisode · 28/07/2020 22:30

Hi Charley, thank you. I wrote my post because I hadn’t seen your better one at 10pm, only an answered question from 9:25...
A NICE review would be ideal..

CharlieParley · 28/07/2020 22:26

@OneEpisode

There are only a handful of comparators. For instance this adult never went thru puberty because of the rare Kallmann syndrome m.youtube.com/watch?v=eitQYgCqA-0 In his case it seems that because the final stage of puberty never closed the growth plates in his bones, he just kept growing. He is taller than he would have been if puberty had happened naturally. For these Phoenixes, there is no data.
In some boys whose height is predicted to be way above average, testosterone is prescribed to stop the growth. Which is also not without side effects. The last time I looked into all this puberty suppression stuff, I came across a forum where these patients discussed the pros and cons of stunting their growth vs testosterone side effects. It seems we cannot yet interfere with the human endocrine system with the finesse required to achieve perfect outcomes.

All we can do is an honest, transparent cost-benefit analysis. And that is sorely needed for puberty blockers used for children who identify as trans.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread