Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Staff revolt as 'non-feminist' weapons firm CEO hired to run Refuge

62 replies

stumbledin · 12/07/2020 00:08

Britain's best known domestic violence charity is in turmoil over the appointment of a woman who runs a weapons technology company as its new chairman.

The senior management team at Refuge are demanding the resignation of Hetti Barkworth-Nanton over her role as chief executive of a Ministry of Defence spin-off company that has developed silent ammunition, hand grenades and a new type of explosive.

In a whistle-blowing letter, seen by The Daily Telegraph, senior Refuge staff warned that her appointment would damage the “reputation and financial well-being” of the charity.

Mrs Barkworth-Nanton is the chief executive of Ploughshare Innovations Ltd, based at Porton Down in Wiltshire, which sells “defence and security technologies” developed in MoD laboratories.

Refuge staff say her involvement in the arms trade is incompatible with a domestic violence charity that abhors violence.

They also accuse her of not being a feminist and of trying to “impose radical change” on a charity “at the height of its reputation”.

In a private report, seen by The Telegraph, Dame Stella Rimington, the former MI5 head and a former Refuge trustee, criticised its board for appointing Mrs Barkworth-Nanton without making “more effort to keep the management team on side” and failing to appreciate the extent of the risk caused.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/07/11/staff-revolt-non-feminist-weapons-firm-boss-hired-run-domestic/

(Dont have access to entire article but am gob smacked not just by the new Chair being CEO of an arms firm but that Stella Rimington MI5 also involved. Pot? kettle?)

OP posts:
AuntyPasta · 12/07/2020 12:44

“Mrs Barkworth-Nanton became involved as a domestic violence campaigner after Joanna Simpson, her best friend and a mother of two, was battered to death with a claw hammer by British Airways pilot Robert Brown, her estranged husband“

AskDan · 12/07/2020 06:22

I am sorry, I dont see the problem with this with either.

ShinyFootball · 12/07/2020 04:14

The issue would be that war makes an enormous amount of people homeless globally. And having an interest in a weapons company is therefore at odds with working with refuge.

ShinyFootball · 12/07/2020 04:12

The issue with charities is a lot of people in private sector moved over and are focused on the money and not the aim.

It feels incompatible to me tbh.

Fieldofgreycorn · 12/07/2020 02:50

What’s wrong with Stella Rimington?

Whatsnewpussyhat · 12/07/2020 01:31

What radical changes does she want to impose? Gender ideology?

madwoman1ntheattic · 12/07/2020 01:14

I don’t see the issue? I’m ex-military. Does everyone who has previously worked in defence get auto-banned? Shit. Better tell the teenage girls that I’ve volunteered with for years that my credentials are besmirched.
The issues with contracts notwithstanding, I would expect that the interview process would have been rigorous enough to determine her motives.

unwashedanddazed · 12/07/2020 01:09

Sorry just read the OP more closely, if the objection is based on her non-feminist values or desire to make changes that are not seen as beneficial, then I would object. But not on her job history at face value.

unwashedanddazed · 12/07/2020 01:06

I don't have a problem with her appointment based on this. The fact is the country employs millions of people in the name of defence, whether in the armed services or in the production of the machinery of war. Countries prepare for war in the effort to maintain peace, as arse about face as that might seem.

Perhaps we should scrap the ministry of defence too?

Redhair23 · 12/07/2020 00:27

I am stunned by this and there seems very little in the media about this so thank you for posting. I’m going to do some googling now.

stumbledin · 12/07/2020 00:22

Refuge has always been seen as more of a corporate entity than a charity, and there were earlier investigations by the charity commission over family members being given well paid jobs or something.

But given the roll call of trustees it is no wonder they go the contract for runing the Domestic Violence Helpline, actually initiated and set up by Women's Aid, as all these people must be part of government networks.

I know WAFE has had its own problems with it's CEO (still not replaced) but as the founders of DV services in this country it is inappropriate that an organisation that was set up to challenge feminist analysis of domestic violence keeps getting Government contracts.

And now this. I think mission drift is really a strong enough description.

OP posts:
Destinysdaughter · 12/07/2020 00:12

Just unbelievable! Who made the decision to appoint her? So inappropriate...