Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Leeds managed zone 'glowing review'

62 replies

FoxBaseBeta · 10/07/2020 09:07

WTF

www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/glowing-review-holbecks-managed-approach-18568851

OP posts:
ChattyLion · 10/07/2020 10:49

Sorry because this shows how privileged and naive I am but fucking hell, every time I read about Holbeck I feel utterly horrified and angry. I mean who the fuck has the right to give over a neighbourhood to prostitution? How dare they? What the fuck did they think would happen there?

wellbehavedwomen · 10/07/2020 10:49

This is horrific. How is it allowed to continue, far less praised?

R0wantrees · 10/07/2020 10:48

Speech by Cllr Sarah Fields November 2018

"I am calling on this council to learn from Ipswich.Visit them and work with them and their police force. I am calling for this council to abolish the shocking and scandalous “managed zone” and commit to the Nordic model (continues)

concludes:
"Leeds has become a city where women cannot even meet to discuss changes to government legislation, but where men are openly raping women, soliciting for sex with children and offering to buy babies.

Our city has become a notorious illustration of misogyny and this scourge must be stopped immediately.

Our women deserve better, our children deserve better, our communities deserve better and the only way forward is to end this sanctioning of sexual violence that should be morally despised.

In memory of Tania Nicol, Gemma Adams, Anneli Alderton, Annette Nichols, Paula Clennell and Daria Pionko."
thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3424059-You-have-an-ally-on-Leeds-City-Council

PaleBlueMoonlight · 10/07/2020 10:37

Fox Could you also ask her where we might find a copy? Thanks

Angryresister · 10/07/2020 10:28

The managed zone is a disaster for women and children. The men should be named and shamed ...with number plates published at the very least.. There should be substantial money available to help women get out of the clutches of the pimps and drug pushers. Leeds should be ashamed that this exists, and this study proves that it is not wanted.

FoxBaseBeta · 10/07/2020 10:17

I'll contact my local councillors for their thoughts (one of whom happens to be Sarah Field Smile)

OP posts:
DianasLasso · 10/07/2020 10:04

Flowers Molten. Many, many years ago I used to go to an open mic session in one of the pubs in Holbeck, which I remember fondly. The area was rough, but I wouldn't have felt more unsafe than in, say, Beeston or Little London or Harehills. These days I wouldn't want to go near Holbeck.

MoltenLasagne · 10/07/2020 09:48

I'd also like to point out that the question seems to be entirely around "has this improved sex work in the area for the better" and nothing on the impacts of women and children in the area, and the message it sends to men, women and children living in an area where vulnerable women are for sale.

I should declare I have a vested interest, being a woman who has moved out of the area because of the managed approach.

MoltenLasagne · 10/07/2020 09:44

The quotes from the report in the article seem to suggest the opposite of this conclusion. I'd also like to review the report itself.

Interestingly, on the article the poll asking about the scheme currently 56% thinks the approach needs to end immediately and 24% thinks there needs to be significant changes. So not the positive community support implied from their reading of the 120 responses.

DianasLasso · 10/07/2020 09:42

Just remind me... this is the "managed zone" where local women can't go out to the shops for fear of being kerb-crawled by men, where women not in prostitution have been dragged off the street into cars and raped by punters.

Christ on a bike. If this was an "independent" report by the University of Huddersfield's Applied Criminology and Policing Centre, what this tells me is there's something rotten to the core about the current state of academia.

From the newspaper article:
Thirty people, including 12 sex workers, three police officers and two councillors, were interviewed as part of the review and the report says that almost 75 per cent of the interviewees said the scheme "should remain but needed to change in some way".

They also invited 1,940 Holbecks households to take part in a survey about the Managed Approach, but only 120 (6 per cent) responded.

The review described this response rate as "very poor" and said "the findings cannot be taken as representative of the people of Holbeck".

A sample of 30! And 40% of that sample were sex workers [sic] i.e. people with a vested financial interest in the system. And when the researchers realised that that their attempt to get a wider sample had led to a very poor response rate, rather than attempt to find a better way to engage with the wider community, they stopped trying.

Fuck me, that has to be some of the worst research methodology I've ever seen. They should be hanging their heads in shame.

FoxBaseBeta · 10/07/2020 09:29

Not that I can find either... I'm intrigued as to how they found this better than the Nordic model.

OP posts:
PaleBlueMoonlight · 10/07/2020 09:26

I am struggling to find a copy of the Review itself. Has it been made public?

Swipe left for the next trending thread