Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Racism rather the sexism in The Handmaid's Tale

57 replies

RedDeerRunning · 07/07/2020 17:23

Long time lurker on these boards and NC for this post.

Margaret Atwood is trending on twitter because of her nonsensical conflation of sex and gender and her invocation of fish science to prove humans can change sex.

I am pretty surprised at the outrage tbh. From the feminist response on Twitter, it would appear that few have actually read The Handmaid’s Tale. Whilst the recent dramatisation has entered into the public consciousness, and ensure ‘Gilead’,’ Handmaid’, ‘Aunt Lydia’ have all become common terms, the original book is underpinned by unconscious racism.

At the heart of the book is the issue that falling fertility rates affect white women only. Black and Native women are not affected by this fictional disease and the policing of white women’s fertility is in order to ensure the continuation of the white race. Atwood makes no comment on this, nor offers any scientific/ medical theory as to why only white women are affected. This would suggest to me a grotesque dehumanisation of Black women as ‘other’.

In fact, the story is so inherently racist that the producers of the TV adaptation had to enage in ‘colourblind casting’ to prevent the show being blindsided by the racist ideology.

It would seem that Atwood is no friend of women, and is particularly dismissive of the lived experiences of Black and Indigenous women. The very notion of a disease that only affects white women, whilst scientifically nonsensical, is also racist AF.

OP posts:
RedDeerRunning · 07/07/2020 17:49

@Pertella

Isnt the point that Gilead is supposed to be a white mans theocracy and non-whites are viewed as lesser beings?
Indeed this is the theme, but the racist construction is not really challenged and the injustice is firmly rooted through the perspective of white women only. The dehumanisation of people of colour is waved through (rather like the proles in 1984).
OP posts:
Goosefoot · 07/07/2020 17:49

So it would be ok if the cause of the fertility issue wasn't raised, so long as it didn't involve a racial difference?

I think that's reaching for a stick to beat someone with. Some sci-fi likes to go into technical and scientific information, but Atwood has never written that way. Arguably she's not a sci-fi writer at all and I don't see how a made-up explanation for the scenario would add anything to the story.

unwashedanddazed · 07/07/2020 17:46

Aren't all black people shipped off to the Labour camps in the novel? Been decades since I read it but my memory is that Atwood exposes the racism of the ultra right religious in their overt erasure of black citizens. My understanding of this aspect being left out of tv series was that the audience would not be able to tolerate such an extreme depiction of the cruelty of fundamentalist ideologies on black people, yet that same treatment of women would be acceptable as entertainment.

I don't agree with what she's saying on Twitter, but I don't think she's racist by any measure. To be honest I'm sick of the current fashion for tweezering out perceived racism from any and every mention of race. See the current thread on Tammy Duckworth for example.

Apileofballyhoo · 07/07/2020 17:45

I'll have to re-read the book because I'm not sure how much I remember from the book versus Season 1 of the tv programme.

Pertella · 07/07/2020 17:42

Isnt the point that Gilead is supposed to be a white mans theocracy and non-whites are viewed as lesser beings?

NearlyGranny · 07/07/2020 17:40

Atwood is no friend of women? How much Atwood have you actually read, OP?

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 07/07/2020 17:38

I am shocked and ashamed to say that I hadn’t realised that, about The Handmaid’s Tale!

Swipe left for the next trending thread