Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GIDS being sued by their safeguarding lead.

786 replies

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 07/07/2020 14:54

(Text from their crowdfunder)

My Details

My name is Sonia Appleby. I am a qualified social worker (1981); adult psychoanalytic psychotherapist (I992); MSc. in health psychology, (research) and MBA. I have a long career safeguarding and protecting children in social care, health and as a children’s guardian in public and private proceedings.

I am currently the Named Professional for Safeguarding Children and the Safeguarding Children Lead at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust. I am therefore still employed by the Trust against which I am bringing my claim.

What is Safeguarding?

In all NHS trusts and organisations there are professionals such as myself, who work with other internal departments and external agencies to ensure there are 'root and branch' systems to keep patients and service users safe. This means responding to patient/service users' personal experiences, also including their environmental, familial, community/peer circumstances and sometimes any of the aforementioned domains could require the intervention of other professionals in different agencies. Safeguarding children and young people also concerns ensuring there is a sufficiently, healthy culture that does not unwittingly contribute to potential harm regarding the people who use and deliver NHS services.

Safeguarding within the Trust

My primary task is to ensure that clinicians protect their patients/service users from avoidable harm and are also able to recognize and appropriately respond to situations where under 18s are in need of safeguarding. My secondary task is challenge practices which are either harmful or could lead to harm. The Trust is commissioned by NHS England to deliver a National Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), which provides services for children and adolescents diagnosed with gender dysphoria. The treatments available also include "puberty blockers".

I have sought to ensure the principle of ''safeguarding children and young people'' is upheld whilst service users are being assessed and treated within the GIDS service.

My Claim

I lodged a whistle-blowing claim in November 2019 at the Central London Employment Tribunal. Since then I have made 2 applications to amend my claim as new information came to light.

In my claim, I allege that because I made "protected disclosures" to my line manager regarding concerns raised by GIDS staff ( that the health or safety of patients was being, had been or was likely to be endangered), I was subjected to detriments.

I allege these detriments are:

i) the Tavistock misused it's own procedures to besmirch me and therefore jeopardize the role of safeguarding within the Trust;

ii) there was an unwritten but mandated directive from the Tavistock management that safeguarding concerns should not be brought to my attention despite being the Trust Safeguarding Children Lead;

iii) and, clinicians were discouraged from reporting safeguarding concerns to me.

I also allege various other detriments.

Further to disclosures made to Newsnight by former staff, BBC Newsnight produced a programme focusing on the allegation that the Trust did not want to report any concerns to me. www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51806962

and you can watch it here

OP posts:
Outhere · 14/06/2021 11:15

Fellow Social Worker checking in. Good luck Sonia!

ArabellaScott · 14/06/2021 11:09

watching.

FindTheTruth · 14/06/2021 11:05

Hannah Barnes @hannahsbee
Short pause while Sonia Appleby’s team discuss an application being considered.
EJG - employment judge Goodman
SA - Sonia Appleby
YG - Yvette Genn, counsel for Tavistock
AP - Anya Palmer, counsel for SA
@hannahsbee
·
29m
AP - wants names of interview transcripts with Dr Sinha to be unredacted. (HB note: These are interview transcripts conducted as part of GIDS review in 2018/19)

AP says claimant in ‘invidious position’ having to guess who is talking about her.
Counsel want names of five managers unredacted along with one other.

AP unable to satisfy herself that everything ‘relevant’ in transcripts has been unredacted

AP: “There certainly looks like there is relevant information behind the redaction”

“We are not happy with the state Of the redactions.”

AP quotes from another transcript of interview with Tavi manager which says that there were “concerns” about claimant’s “approach” to GIDS cases. Transcript says “some may have felt it was a bit transphobic.” AP makes argument that SA’s team needs to know identity of manager

AP says that everything contained in transcripts is relevant to SA’s claim

8m
SA’s ‘whistleblowing’ starts in 2017. Several protected disclosures take place in 2017 and 2018. Alleged detriments begin in 2018

SpindleWhorl · 14/06/2021 11:05

@drwitch

very similar to the Allison Bailey case
Isn't it just?

These sound like very heavy reductions from the Tavistock.

ethelredonagoodday · 14/06/2021 11:04

Following

Signalbox · 14/06/2021 11:01

Yes it is shocking. It must have been very difficult for her to continue working at the trust. knowing that people have made such serious accusations against you.

drwitch · 14/06/2021 10:58

very similar to the Allison Bailey case

Manderleyagain · 14/06/2021 10:56

Signlbox, thanks for that.
Shocking that sonia hasn't been allowed to see which managers are talking about her in the transcripts.

SpindleWhorl · 14/06/2021 10:51

Ok so it looks like today is for arguments about document bundles to be submitted to and read by the employment tribunal panel, and, crucially, the Tavistock's redactions.

Signalbox · 14/06/2021 10:44

manderleyagain looks like Hannah Barnes @hannasbee is live tweeting.

twitter.com/hannahsbee/status/1404336944906186755

KihoBebiluPute · 13/06/2021 21:26

Shovelled.

HeavenHotel · 13/06/2021 21:17

Donated.

SweetGrapes · 13/06/2021 20:47

No idea - but hope so. Placemarking.

Manderleyagain · 13/06/2021 18:56

The first day of the hearing is tomorrow. Does anyone know if there will be live tweeting or reporting?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/05/2021 12:47

Oh that's brilliant about Sonia. I love Anya, have followed her on Twitter for years. Will dig.

MarciaDidia · 14/05/2021 12:37

Sonia has instructed Anya Palmer as Counsel. Anya represents Maya Forstater and I'm sure will do an excellent job in what looks to be a fascinating trial. I gather it's scheduled for 9 days so it will be expensive- let's keep digging!

Tibtom · 13/05/2021 21:02

In terms of the donation to crowdjustice - I generally remove it (partly as 10% seems steep) but I try and leave it on every now and then. I get the thing about Allison, but equally, they could refuse to host any of these cases if they just get hassle for it and don't make any money from them.

Crowdjustice take 3% and admin charge from each donation.

CuntAmongstThePigeons · 13/05/2021 18:56

Also pledged. Thanks for the reminder!

stonecat · 13/05/2021 18:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Kit19 · 13/05/2021 16:39

dug! :D

OldCrone · 13/05/2021 16:30

Sonia's whistleblowing claim is due to be heard in London Central employment tribunal starting on 14 June.

twitter.com/SexMattersOrg/status/1392453774757699587

Mulletsaremisunderstood · 13/05/2021 15:50

Hi, just wanted to bump this as there is only 16 days left if anyone wants to water some flowers Flowers

SweetGrapes · 23/03/2021 15:59

Bumping... anyone want to do some gardening??

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 21/03/2021 20:58

@SarahTancredi

And some how they always seem to have more than one protected characteristic too. Age Race Disability etc

So its also very hard to question someone is is not only potentially speaking from multiple places of discrimination but they are given the benefit of the doubt because no one wants to be seen as racist/homophobic/disablist.

Which is kinda discriminatory in itself as people who are black/gay/autistic etc are not only perfectly able to act within the confines of the law and do not need to be allowed to flout safe guarding or act inappropriately in order to participate in life . But instead holding them to these pretty average standards is seen as discriminatory instead.

Its bizarre.

If you are capable of holding office in an organisation, you are capable of behaving to the same standards we hold everybody else in office to. If you can't or won't behave to those standards, you are not fit to hold office.

Protected characteristics are not a shield to avoid accountability.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 21/03/2021 20:14

Especially when the majority of people aren't predators so would not be looking at the policies in the sense of what it would allow them to do.

Security professionals need to be involved in policy design as they are trained in looking for loopholes and flaws. It takes a thief to catch a thief.