Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Trying to understand the hate trans people get on here.

709 replies

Kelcat9494 · 05/07/2020 11:35

Hello,

Firstly I want to say I am not attacking anyone on this forum and I expect the same respect as we are all entitled to an opinion and I am genuinely interested in the reasons why transgender people get so much hate on here:

Firstly I see a lot about not wanting to share bathrooms with trans women as it's a women's safe space - I don't really understand this because to be honest when I'm sat in the cubicle doing my business, I don't think about the persons genitals next to me, it's all very private as you know. The only thing we'd share is the sinks and I don't see a problem with that really. I did read a post about a abuse survivor not wanting to the share the bathroom with someone with a penis (I'm really sorry that the person went through the abuse but that isn't trans people's fault, the fault is with the abuser alone) but in reality a trans person is more at risk in the bathroom and you have no idea whether they are pre op or post op as again in the bathrooms I've been in we don't show each other our genitalia. They are genuinely just doing their human business in the same room as you so don't understand the problem, actually I suppose people are afraid some odd men would use being transgender as an excuse to use the woman's bathroom but that's not trans women's fault also by this logic if we don't want trans women in the bathroom then we should have transmen in there (either pre op or post op), I've posted some pictures below of transmen and woman, would you really want the trans women in men's bathroom and the transmen in the womens?? (I can only post three but you get my point).

I know JKRowling posted about periods and a lot of people jumped on it to say only women have periods and whatever, this isn't true though is it? Some biological women aren't able to have periods or carry a pregnancy or be able to give birth so if we don't see that as a problem as we recognise it's a biological issue then why is trans-men having a period a problem and trans women not having one an issue? And who actually cares? There's enough tampax to go around, maybe let's focus on making them free for women and transmen as I for one is sick of paying for a "luxury item" I need every month due to no fault of my own.

I can't think of anymore off the top of my head that's been posted but anything in the comments I'm happy to reply to but I genuinely think this forum needs to consider what transgender people actually go through, imagine not feeling like you're in the right body, being attacked and hated for who you are and it's obviously not for fun and games because transgender people actually commit suicide over the issues they face remember #bekind and really think how sharing a bathroom or sharing a tampax would affect you? I don't think you'd kill yourself over it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
JonHammIsMyJamm · 31/07/2020 10:35

Maybe loos don’t concern you but but hospital wards, prisons, refuges, sex segregated sports are all huge issues.

There have been numerous threads like yours asking GC women to defend their positions and they have, in clear, polite and evidence based ways. Maybe look back at one of those?

Melroses · 31/07/2020 10:30

We need a like button on here.

Trying to understand the hate trans people get on here.
Annasgirl · 31/07/2020 10:23

@Winniefred - awesome post.

BaronEssoStation · 31/07/2020 10:18

.... the difference between Transwomen & Men is zero when it comes to Male pattern violence and abuse.

I like the cut of winniefred's jib.

If the post is deleted then it's a fucking outrage.

NonnyMouse1337 · 31/07/2020 10:10

Well said, Winniefred. 👍🏾

Winniefred · 31/07/2020 10:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Winesalot · 31/07/2020 09:58

the random and amateurish armchair psychological diagnoses and assessments about individuals on YouTube – while undoubtedly cathartic to express – are an embarrassment and an affront to any notion of what genuine social activism is.

I am only just beginning Irreversible Damage and it was absolutely no surprise that these ‘influencers’ are part of the massive upswing in girls identifying out of being a woman. And I already knew this from both personal observation, being professionally very active in social media, and seeing it in action with my daughter’s friends.

I think that people reading will appreciate any insight into this group of people who build their entire lives on making this their business. whereas I could not handle to disconnect between the glamorized and highly curated content I was posting for myself and others and reality, many people still don’t realize that even with the best intentions, authenticity becomes performance over time.

So, please DO keep discussing these people who seek to ‘influence’ without consideration of just how negligent they are and how complicit they are in shaping young impressionable minds that if left unexposed would follow a different path.

boatyardblues · 31/07/2020 08:56

@Datun

I do love it when we women get told off with overly verbose pomposity

You have more commitment than me. I didn't get beyond paragraph three.

I'll say one thing for most of the women on here, at least they can lay claim to a modicum of communication skill.

Same here.
RufustheSniggeringReindeer · 31/07/2020 08:47

Pfft, I just scroll past all the me-me-me-ing, trying to guess how many paragraphs of waffling this time

Well that last one was me me me macbook pro me me You’re embarrassing

Sooooo....

Portnlemon · 31/07/2020 08:46

Despite Stonewall admitting that they can't get everyone to convert it seems the already converted politicians are not going to recognise this and are going to carry on preaching oblivious to this volte face.

highame · 31/07/2020 08:40

🤣🤣

SerenityNowwwww · 31/07/2020 08:38

Glitter - the devils dust.

BaronEssoStation · 31/07/2020 08:35

I don’t give a glitter-rolled shit about them.

That's a messy job; have you washed your hands?

ScrimpshawTheSecond · 31/07/2020 08:08

we don’t have to convert everybody to our way of understanding gender,” Nancy Kelley said

Convert. Interesting choice of words.

highame · 31/07/2020 08:04

Although the new chief exec is making conciliatory noises, my distrust is too great. I believe that even if Stonewall rolls back I will still feel they are just playing a waiting game until the smoke clears and then will be back to stealth and misinterpretation of the law.

I don't think anything has been said about misrepresentation, that's a court case in the wings

TehBewilderness · 31/07/2020 01:22

I am guessing the reason that Stonewall has lost money the past three years is that the changes the leadership made were not viewed as inclusive by the Lesbian, Gay, & Bisexual donors they no longer appear to represent.

Datun · 31/07/2020 00:08

“For Stonewall to succeed, it doesn’t have to make people believe as it believes. What it has to do is make people support changes that make trans lives easier.”

Well, I for one cannot wait for them to start telling people that one of the changes is that they no longer believe in homosexuality.

ALittleBitofVitriol · 31/07/2020 00:08

@Datun

I do love it when we women get told off with overly verbose pomposity

You have more commitment than me. I didn't get beyond paragraph three.

I'll say one thing for most of the women on here, at least they can lay claim to a modicum of communication skill.

Pfft, I just scroll past all the me-me-me-ing, trying to guess how many paragraphs of waffling this time.

Those walls of text are just so boring.

Portnlemon · 30/07/2020 23:51

Even Stonewall have been forced to concede that the elaborate, rickety self refererential construction of gender identity belief can't be forced on people. A lot of it is quite laughable and worse, from the perspective of parents here, dangerous.

The new chief executive of Stonewall has sought to defuse the increasingly toxic row over transgender rights, telling the Observer that her organisation would no longer seek to persuade its critics to accept its views on gender.

“I’m really focused on the idea that we don’t have to convert everybody to our way of understanding gender,” Nancy Kelley said in her first interview since taking up the position as head of the UK’s leading gay rights charity.

“For Stonewall to succeed, it doesn’t have to make people believe as it believes. What it has to do is make people support changes that make trans lives easier.”

www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jun/27/stonewall-new-boss-gender-transgender-rights-nancy-kelley

By all means make lives easier Nancy, but that's not what Stonewall has started and you are completely unable to recover your innocence from the conversion therapy you have rammed down everyone's throats.

DuDuDuLangaLangaBingBong · 30/07/2020 23:32

As any good second-waver will tell you, the personal is the political.

Sure, but you are deploying ] that phrase arse backwards. Feminists took the personal (division of labour in the home, for example) and made who does the housework/childcare/work beyond the home a societal discussion, not something that was simply decided between two individuals, a husband and wife.
Here, we are talking about the big picture regards transactivism attempting to erase biological sex from law, and thus homosexuality from legal protection, and you’ve come along and gone ‘Well I’mnot doing that’

I chose to use the word ‘ideology’ because there are plenty of trans people that don’t want to remove biological sex from law, but nonetheless there is an activist push to do so - those activists are attempting to push their beliefs (that ‘gender’ is more important than ‘sex’) on the rest of society, so what is that if not an ideology?

It’s a ‘Queer Theory‘ Frankenstein’s monster that escaped the university and ran amok amongst various public institutions - but I don’t really care much what we call it - as long as the law can’t compel me to call it anything I know not to be true.

On a closing note, the random and amateurish armchair psychological diagnoses and assessments about individuals on YouTube – while undoubtedly cathartic to express – are an embarrassment and an affront to any notion of what genuine social activism is.

U OK HUN? 🙊🙄😂

Datun · 30/07/2020 23:26

I do love it when we women get told off with overly verbose pomposity

You have more commitment than me. I didn't get beyond paragraph three.

I'll say one thing for most of the women on here, at least they can lay claim to a modicum of communication skill.

highame · 30/07/2020 22:31

They do like to play a long game. I think they have a competition about who can get the thread to go on for the longest. I think they spend all day or days planning and putting stuff together. They play in packs is my guess. Things always start the same.

*Dreeple

I have no hatred for “trans people

I don’t give a glitter-rolled shit about them* I think this is succinct😁

OvaHere · 30/07/2020 22:09

I do love it when we women get told off with overly verbose pomposity. Luckily for us it's a longstanding occurrence on the feminism board!

Portnlemon · 30/07/2020 21:53

Well that's us told.

Yada yada, what's in anyone's pants, you're all indulging in cruelty, I want a passport. Your all an embarrassment, sign off with a hip down with the kids cringe.

FloralBunting · 30/07/2020 21:27

I take any assessments of my negative views about the YouTubers who influenced my mentally unwell daughter with the same contempt with which they are offered to me.

Swipe left for the next trending thread