Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Update from Allison Bailey

143 replies

Aesopfable · 05/07/2020 09:58

Didn’t see this on the current post about her fundraising but thought it deserved a post of its own.

mobile.twitter.com/BluskyeAllison/status/1278317988429561857

OP posts:
RozWatching · 07/03/2021 11:21

Yeah, telling distressed teenagers that they have privilege over adult male people... What kind of 'empowerment' is that?

FindTheTruth · 07/03/2021 11:16

The cotton ceiling 'workshop' run by Page that Allison rightly called out twitter is the tip of the iceberg, compared to the policing of the teenage females in that lgbt group, compared to what the females ended up doing

FindTheTruth · 07/03/2021 11:11

You have to wonder how on top of things the Stonewall board and CEO really are

or they just don't care

or they want old male people controlling teenage female people

Benji's experience in that 'lgbt' group run by Page.... chilled me to the core and made me think 'victim of coercive control' and worse.

RozWatching · 07/03/2021 10:57

Why does Alex Sharpe feel the need to get involved in this BS?

AS is on the advisory board of the ESRC-funded Future of Legal Gender project so not exactly voiceless - why get involved in this sort of 'activism'?

www.rollonfriday.com/news-content/lesbian-barrister-investigated-setting-lgb-group

Sharpe, who presumably gives Bailey a wide berth at the office, has previously said lesbians should consider why they won't sleep with transwomen who identify as lesbians, and has implied that lesbians who don’t question their attraction to people of the same sex are being unethical. Referring to the ‘cotton ceiling’, a term coined by trans rights activists to describe lesbians' refusal to have sex with people with penises, Sharpe tweeted, "Cotton ceiling. There is nothing wrong with asking people to reflect on preferences where they exclude a whole class of ppl”.

sashh · 07/03/2021 10:43

Stonewall have more money than god, and more than 150 employees. Surely they could find someone in that lot who could spell, who could use grammar correctly, and who wouldn't write "yourselves" when they mean "you"?

My favorite was accusing her of chairing, "Women's pace" meetings.

RozWatching · 07/03/2021 10:28

of all the things I've read and seen in the war on lesbians, the Benji interview with Boyce where she describes 40 year old male born people talking to teenage females in the group run by Morgan Page, is one I will never forget

The cotton ceiling stuff is bad enough, I hadn't realised that the person Benji was talking about is the same Morgan who runs the Stonewall empowerment programme (with lottery money) Shock

You have to wonder how on top of things the Stonewall board and CEO really are. I know that they wanted to give T its own organisation within SW, but a little oversight wouldn't hurt.

Impatiens · 07/03/2021 10:00

Hopefully it will be in the media more after the court case. And, if she wins, I also hope other ppl who've had the same treatment will realise they don't actually have to put up with this shit.

They probably can't afford legal action but they can use AB as an example of why Stonewall aren't a fit organisation to decide on matters of diversity

TheFleegleHasLanded · 07/03/2021 09:51

How is this story not in the press? So-called ‘LGBT’ rights group attempt to get a black, lesbian, working class barrister kicked out of her chambers.

It writes itself doesn’t it? So many angles to tell this story from yet tumbleweed......

Even the comedy angle of the appalling spelling and grammar is worth pursuing, never mind the rape culture of the ‘cotton ceiling’. I’m baffled, honestly.

JosephineBaker · 07/03/2021 09:21

@30PercentRecycled

Could we submit FOI requests to public bodies who are Stonewall Champions to discover whether they received similar complaints about their staff and whether any action resulted?
Have you seen the BBC’s weaselly response to such a FOI request?

mobile.twitter.com/ripx4nutmeg/status/1367921393606815745

JustTurtlesAllTheWayDown · 07/03/2021 09:13

Surely they don’t have people sitting on the internet monitoring everybody who works for their “diversity champions”?
There are plenty of monitors out there, eager to report in on any woman who's on twitter under her own name.
I'm not sure whether the email came before or after the formation of the LGB Alliance but I'd put money on those monitors immediately starting to dig into the lives of anyone even remotely involved in it so they could put in complaints every where they could.
I'd also be very surprised if this is the first time they've done it. It's far more likely that other women have not felt able to go public with it after their livelihoods were put at risk. I can't help thinking that Allison winning this case might give other people the courage to come forward.

Forgotthebins · 07/03/2021 09:02

What puzzles me is how Stonewall got the info. Surely they don’t have people sitting on the internet monitoring everybody who works for their “diversity champions”? Is it just that she was uncomplimentary about one of their staff so they went on an expedition to dig up dirt? I have not heard before of them identifying and demanding the firing of staff from their “diversity champions” - and given the size of many of those organisations, they must have had staff who have publicly said homophobic or genuinely transphobic things. It feels like Stonewall were taking revenge for their staff member being presented in a negative light, not that they were looking out for LGBT people in general.

FindTheTruth · 06/03/2021 22:38

good idea 30percent

I guess the FOI details, specs would be important - good suggestions Tib

BernardBlackMissesLangCleg · 06/03/2021 22:27

just read the stonewall email

fuck me

donated again. it seems the only rational response

Tibtom · 06/03/2021 21:57

I doubt you could get an email like Allison's - it would probably be considered personal data. But may be could ask for number of complaints received from Stonewall, how many related to individuals and action taken, and how many relate to policies and copies of those?

30PercentRecycled · 06/03/2021 20:20

I have never done an FOI myself. Surely they could redact details? Or give a count but no detail.

Manderleyagain · 06/03/2021 20:10

Good question 30percent do you think they would answer that or would they all just cite HR etc as reasons not to answer?

30PercentRecycled · 06/03/2021 19:12

Could we submit FOI requests to public bodies who are Stonewall Champions to discover whether they received similar complaints about their staff and whether any action resulted?

tobee · 06/03/2021 18:43

Where would the TRAs be without the invention of the internet hey?

PurpleHoodie · 06/03/2021 18:42

Ah well.

Thank goodness LGB organisations are rising up to replace the anti-homosexual Stonewall.

titchy · 06/03/2021 18:41

@PurpleHoodie

Love a bit of FOI
Unfortunately FOI only applies to public sector organisations.
PurpleHoodie · 06/03/2021 18:39

They will.

Datun · 06/03/2021 18:36

Why aren't stonewall gasping in horror at the rampant homophobia detailed on this thread? Why aren't they stopping it?

It's unbelievably vile. I genuinely don't know how Twitter allows it. They will have to account for this, at some point.

mobile.twitter.com/hatpinwoman/status/1367791397735182338

PurpleHoodie · 06/03/2021 18:35

Love a bit of FOI

gardenbird48 · 06/03/2021 18:33

@PurpleHoodie

Interesting question.

We should find out.

that would make a good FOI request Wink Hmm
PurpleHoodie · 06/03/2021 17:41

Interesting question.

We should find out.