If anyone thinks that your average GC Mumsnet feminist would object to there being a transman represented in the advert, then they haven’t been listening to what we’re saying. I like it- it’s what inclusion actually looks like. The transman has female bodied experiences, even if that has distressed them to the point of wanting none of it, so their inclusion is fine, and presumably, as they were filmed, they were comfortable with it.
Women’s objections here are to being erased, replaced, talked over, airbrushed out in favour of male bodies. The advert does the exact opposite, so there’s nothing to object to- quite the contrary.
The only thing I slightly object to is that it’s dragged the conversation back to trans again, when it would be nice for once to just talk about women’s stuff ( and I’ve contributed to that!)