RatinaMaze, thank you for your contribution. I’m sure you will find there are loads of us who entered the debate on the opposite side but changed our minds.
I honestly can’t think of any other example of the needs of one protected group directly contravening the needs of another protected group
The one I often think of is religion and sexual orientation. It often plays on my mind because I’m religious and bisexual. When they clash a reasonable middle ground is usually found. So, for instance, a bakery cannot refuse to serve a customer because she is a lesbian. But the baker can refuse to produce a cake with a pro-gay rights message on.
We have not yet found the balance between women’s sex-based rights and trans rights. We cannot find the balance as long as a significant proportion of the pro-trans lobby refuse to even accept there is a clash.