Connecticut high school sports transgender policy violates civil rights of female athletes

The whole article is absurd. This is how it starts:

Connecticut’s policy allowing transgender girls to compete as girls in high school sports violates the civil rights of athletes who have always identified as female...

What they mean is:

Connecticut’s policy allowing boys to compete as girls in high school sports violates the civil rights of female athletes...

Which makes it much clearer what is actually going on here. And surely nobody in their right mind would think that boys should be able to just say 'I identify as a girl' and immediately be allowed to switch to competing in the female category.

The male and female categories are there because male bodies are different from female bodies, not because male brains are different from female brains. So claiming ladybrain doesn't give you a free pass to switch categories.

Great news although ridiculous that this is even considered great news given its basic biology & women to matter.

In bizarro World “sex stereotyping” means thinking someone is less of a woman because they are actually male.

This part of the article/quotes puzzled me.

Connecticut law is clear and students who identify as female are to be recognized as female for all purposes – including high school sports,” the athletic conference said in a statement. “To do otherwise would not only be discriminatory but would deprive high school students of the meaningful opportunity to participate in educational activities, including inter-scholastic sports, based on sex-stereotyping and prejudice sought to be prevented by Title IX and Connecticut state law

Have they heard themselves? Sex stereotyping? Being born female is a stereotype? More so the growing the hair and wearing a skirt?

How do they say it with a straight face

www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/may/28/connecticut-transgender-federal-civil-rights-lawsuit

A good start, but a long way to go.

And this nonsensical HRT argument. Reduces male muscle mass - but not to female levels and has NO impact on anatomical, physiological, biomechanical and anthropometric male advantage.

The Connecticut girls are extraordinary.

Yet again - why is this left to girls? Where are all the grown ups? I would like male athletes/grandees to speak out about this. Seb Coe. Usain Bolt etc - apart from Daley Thompson. Where the hell are these guys? If they don’t speak out, they are all complicit in the removal of safe, equitable and fair sport for women and girls.

The categories should be women and open, not men and mixed sex.

Awesome stuff!

Well it clearly makes the point - T 'rights' are the removal of female civil rights. That's what it boils down to. Any pleas to overturn this or anger about this is simply resistance to females retaining civil rights.

I agree. But the point is that, by claiming that HRT is levelling the playing field (even though it isn't), Yearwood et al are effectively admitting that competing without HRT - as they were before - is unfair.

Ah yeah, I see what you mean. Bit slow today it seems

...HRT doesn't take away the advantages anyway, so not sure why that gets used as an excuse

I agree. But the point is that, by claiming that HRT is levelling the playing field (even though it isn't), Yearwood et al are effectively admitting that competing without HRT - as they were before - is unfair.

That is a really significant concession and quite a foolish one for them to have made, IME. If they had stuck to the line that 'fairness' to TW trumps all other considerations, they might have won out because that principle is arguably unaffected by biological reality - it is simply an issue of fairness to trans people (Again, this is not my own view, I am just summarising what their lawyers would likely argue)

Once they start conceding that measures need to be taken to reduce unfairness if TW compete against girls, they open up whole issue of biological differences between TW and XX women to scrutiny.

Yes The sexism is appalling, I’ve also heard from Trans men That they took a sudden interest in science And math after starting TEstosterone.

...HRT doesn't take away the advantages anyway, so not sure why that gets used as an excuse. Yeah it might possibly make you weaker in comparison to other men, but it does not take away biological advantages male puberty brings..

Mind, you do get TW who claim, among many other insulting things, that after transitioning they can no longer open jars. Same as how they suddenly become horrific drivers apparently

Apparently the athletes are now claiming the trans women are taking HRT to “even the playing field” but the records being challenged were set before They were on any hormones (mere months after they were competing as boys iirc)

Also, that is effectively an admission that transwomen not on HRT do have an unfair advantage, which previously Andraya Yearwood & co had vehemently denied. This is one of the good things about the US reliance on the courts to test policy - it often brings scrutiny to the assumptions underlying government (State or Federal) policy that, in the UK, would be hidden.

Unfortunately this will be used as further evidence of if this administration being “anti LGBT” when actually it’s obvious to literally everyone this is unfair.

Apparently the athletes are now claiming the trans women are taking HRT to “even the playing field” but the records being challenged were set before They were on any hormones (mere months after they were competing as boys iirc)...

Great news but yes shocking that it was considered reasonable in the first place.

That'll be the case going before the judge who is trying to prevent the complainants' counsel from using any factually accurate biologically based language that would clearly and unequivocally identify the male runners as male, because to do so would be unkind.

What's so upsetting is that they were allowed to compete with females in the first place.

Is that your tongue I see in your cheek, boatyard?

This is great news but the ruling doesn't over-ride State law. It's basically just an opinion on policy until it's tested in court and, unless the girls win their lawsuit, it is highly likely to be over-turned if Biden wins in November.

If the girls do win, however, there is a good chance of them also winning the inevitable subsequent appeals, as Trump has placed conservative judges in many key judicial positions (not just the Supreme Court). Of course, this is not a good thing for women's rights in general, but it is good news for this case, And at least the current judge has shown pretty incontrovertible evidence of extrinsic bias, which is likely to be grounds for the girls to appeal if they lose in this round.

Hooray.

I hope the federal case is heard fairly and impartially. Is that your tongue I see in your cheek, boatyard? That'll be the case going before the judge who is trying to prevent the complainants' counsel from using any factually accurate biologically based language that would clearly and unequivocally identify the male runners as male, because to do so would be unkind.

This is cheering news. I hope the federal case is heard fairly and impartially.

Unsurprising tbh, as blatantly obvious. But good news.

Very good news.

Let’s hope it applies to the whole USA, and female athletes who have lost out on sports scholarships to universities, due to male bodied athletes taking their places, can sue for damages.