Daily Mail article M&S, Liz Truss, Pushback!

Ach, those of us that remember 'the dress' suspect M&S aren't interested in having customers and exist merely to troll us.

Does he realise that he is saying ‘We respect their right to make others uncomfortable’?

This.

This policy - the hospital wards, all of it - is insisting that male people must always be made comfortable and their feelings nurtured by permitting them to make female people uncomfortable and to ignore their feelings. It works for people born male. It does not work for people born female - but to even discuss the needs of people born female is 'transphobic' if it conflicts with anything a male person wants.

Straight forward male supremacism.

My take is M&S probably does realise the damage this is doing and clearly the chairman doesn't agree with mixed sex as per his letter. But at the moment they are trapped. They can't backdown by themselves because they are so committed to Stonewall. They are probably desperate for the government to come out and make the decision for them.

Then they can say sorry stonewall we have no choice. And all the other retailers will breathe a sigh of relief and follow suit.

Its scandalous a lobby group has grabbed this much power.

I suspect this too michelle.

But sadly it is most retailers now. JL included.

Primary don’t even have doors!!! Just curtains still and have seats in front of curtains where men can sit and peak through curtain gaps!!!!

I still remain to be convinced that Truss isn't trying to please both sides by saying single sex spaces for women and girls will be protected, while actually meaning 'but anyone of any sex can be a woman or girl'.

There must be someone making these crazy decisions who is deeply involved in the Trans Rights Movement at the top of M&S management.
It would be so, so easy for them to simply say 'we follow current laws' and not allow men into the women's areas, but no, they just double down.

“We recognise customers will self-identify and respect their right to choose the fitting rooms they feel comfortable in.”

We recognize that males love our knickers and that wearing a dress to get into the female changing rooms isn’t a problem for them. We DO NOT recognize how women who are being then used for wankfodder by being in the next cubicle is problematic for women.

Just shut up you women and service the brave and stunning, vulnerable men of society. Do your bit!!

Does he realise that he is saying ‘We respect their right to make others uncomfortable’?

“We recognise customers will self-identify and respect their right to choose the fitting rooms they feel comfortable in.”

Well we recognise that enabling perverts will deter women from using your store, so don’t go whinging to us when your market share drops even further.

Unbelievable that even with the evidence presented ie the law they still place mens rights as above the law and of utmost importance.

‘We recognise customers will self-identify and respect their right to choose the fitting rooms they feel comfortable in.’

Did he say this before or after receiving the letter from Truss?

At the end of the article M&S are still trotting out the same ‘inclusive’ line that we got.

Really useful to have it all set out clearly in the DM. Their readers must form a core segment of the M&S market.

If M&S care one jot about their market share they must recognise that this is not good for their image. I realise I have not set foot in M&S clothes stores since reading those smutty lingerie reviews. Not necessarily a deliberate policy, simply M&S no longer feels as if it is a place that wants people like me, or where I want to be.

This is great news and it will also solidify the Baroness’ interpretation of Liz Truss’ letter so there is complete clarity if there was any ambiguity left after the activists started up about it. I felt like the other shoe was about to drop with a ‘oh... my letter has been misunderstood’.

Thank you Baroness Nicholson and Liz Truss. I cannot say it on Twitter so I will say it here.

Long overdue but pleasing progress nevertheless.
I see that the Health Minister is also quoted as reviewing mixed sex hospital wards :
The guidance is clear that providers of National Health Service-funded care are expected to have a zero-tolerance approach to mixed-sex accommodation, except where it is in the overall best interest of all patients affected.
I hope that this refers to places like Intensive Care wards that are always mixed sex as opposed to enabling self identity?

CommentS are universally supportive of gender critical position