Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Attorneys for girls in US sports case must refer to males as transgender females

92 replies

CumannNamBan · 11/05/2020 17:07

Judge on the case:

"What I’m saying is you must refer to them as “transgender females” rather than as “males.” Again, that’s the more accurate terminology, and I think that it fully protects your client’s legitimate interests. Referring to these individuals as “transgender females” is consistent with science, common practice and perhaps human decency." 🙄

www.nationalreview.com/news/attorneys-for-connecticut-high-school-runners-ask-judge-to-recuse-after-he-forbids-them-from-describing-trans-athletes-as-male/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

OP posts:
Lordfrontpaw · 11/05/2020 18:50

It’s like a sci fi film when the hero can ‘see’ the truth but no one believed them. What was the one with the sunglasses and aliens again?

OvaHere · 11/05/2020 18:42

Exactly. It starts the entire proceedings on an unbalanced footing in favour of the males.

Language is hugely important and a massive part of why this mess has occurred in the first place. Even though everyone concerned knows these individuals are male the minute they are referred to as female it throws peoples instincts off - which is of course what they want.

testing987654321 · 11/05/2020 18:38

Are we going to have people refuse to lie and get put in prison for contempt of court to make this point?

testing987654321 · 11/05/2020 18:35

I was thinking rohypnol analogy as well. You can't argue that females can't run in the girls race without sounding unfair. Boys or males definitely shouldn't be in that race.

It's the institutional capture of the judiciary before the case has even started. It's the essence of the case.

OvaHere · 11/05/2020 18:29

It's the rohypnol analogy all over again. If forced to refer to males as females when the whole point of the case is that they are male is just adding a layer of obfuscation to the proceedings which frankly shouldn't be allowed in a court of law.

GrinitchSpinach · 11/05/2020 18:27

I hope they are successful at getting the judge to recuse himself. It certainly sounds like he’s made up his mind already.

For anyone interested in this case, here is a link to an online event co-hosted last month by Women’s Liberation Front and Save Women’s Sports:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=8c7ASVPPEwM

It features the three female plaintiffs, their attorney, and the mother of one of the plaintiffs. They are genuinely brave and stunning.

nauticant · 11/05/2020 18:15

Since there's been an application for recusal*, which many judges would interpret as a hostile act, then I assume ADF are already expecting that they'll need to be appealing the case.

  • inviting the judge to withdraw from the case because they're unable to try it fairly, for example because they're not impartial
ChurchOfWokeApostate · 11/05/2020 18:11

Yep, just wrong, wrong, wrong

SarahTancredi · 11/05/2020 17:50

Wrong. On every count. But how do you argue with a presiding Judge? Women are just fucked aren’t we?

Especially when the judge is joining in and not happy with being perfectly polite and using names which should be enough.

Instead validation trumps all else even the right to what your own eyes see.

Tootletum · 11/05/2020 17:46

How about just individuals who have mental health issues and have decided changing their gender identity will fix it.

Lordfrontpaw · 11/05/2020 17:45

Their lawyer is going for it!

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 11/05/2020 17:43

Well - they say we should be happy to be redesignated as ciswomen - so we should be able to rename them too - penis-having pseudofemales should do it.

nauticant · 11/05/2020 17:42

This was the girls' counsel's response in the teleconference:

The entire focus of the case is the fact that the CIAC policy allows individuals who are physiologically, genetically male to compete in girls’ athletics. But if I use the term “females” to describe those individuals — and we’ve said in our opening brief, we’re happy to use their preferred names, because names are not the point to the case. Gender identity is not the point of this case. The point of this case is physiology of bodies driven by chromosomes and the documented athletic advantage that comes from a male body, male hormones, and male puberty in particular. So, Your Honor, I do have a concern that I am not adequately representing my client and I’m not accurately representing their position in this case as it has to be argued before Your Honor and all the way up if I refer to these individuals as “female,” because that’s simply, when we’re talking about physiology, that’s not accurate, at least in the belief of my clients.

That's pretty good as an extempore response.

SarahTancredi · 11/05/2020 17:36

Can you imagine trying to sound knowledgable , confident , accurate and professional standing up in court whilst having to not slip up and use the wrong words and completely ignore your eyes. It would be impossible. Case would be lost before it's even begun and no one would even be able to follow.

Wearywithteens · 11/05/2020 17:36

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn at the poster's request.

OldCrone · 11/05/2020 17:33

What is accurate about calling them "transgender females"? They are not female. "Transgender males" would be more accurate, since they are males who identify as transgender.

SarahTancredi · 11/05/2020 17:30

It just never ends for these poor girls does it.

How can anyone see this as fair.

Mind you they dont do they. They know and they dont care