Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Oxfordshire CC withdraws transgender toolkit after girl's legal challenge

85 replies

GruffaIo · 07/05/2020 20:46

www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/18434781.oxfordshire-council-transgender-guide-scrapped-girls-court-case/

13 year old girl's legal challenge. The High Court ruled that it was arguable that the toolkit was unlawful.

OP posts:
Apollo440 · 13/05/2020 17:50

Stonewall 'law' is coming to an end.

Datun · 13/05/2020 17:33

They're saying they're waiting for the EHRC updated guidance?

Seems like that is the advice they've been given.

The new guidance will be ^very* interesting indeed. And now under national scrutiny.

Lordfrontpaw · 13/05/2020 17:27

Well I’m not holding my breath for apologies/arse-kicking but I live in hope.

Polestar50 · 13/05/2020 17:14

Don't know if this has already been posted elsewhere but SSA have just announced that Shopshire have withdrawn their toolkit too!

https://mobile.twitter.com/SafeSchoolsUK/status/1260573057032302593?s=20&fbclid=IwAR2nDq5aH5h8-OzXuD1605xN8yyVN5aaleJ8saKId8zTSjh0RR_BnM3g35PE

2fallsagain · 10/05/2020 16:07

Thanks. Can you email it to [email protected] please?

FemaleAndLearning · 10/05/2020 15:13

2Falls
Yes I'll copy my letter. Just need to find right person to send it to and structure my letter.

2fallsagain · 10/05/2020 13:30

Female could you post it here so others can follow up. We will put something out next week (have something else going in right now!) but if people can start contacting their LEAs that would be great.

FemaleAndLearning · 10/05/2020 09:58

Fantastic news and a great first step. Kudos to the teenage girl and Safe Schools Alliance for highlighting this. I noticed my LA on the list of contributors to the Toolkit so I will be following this up and letting them know the outcome for Oxfordshire.

deepwatersolo · 10/05/2020 05:31

Isn‘t that something Lisa Muggeridge (spelling?) talked about repeatedly? How all their fancy guidlines must meet a brick wall, once the ,lower level‘ institutions tasked with safe guarding must weigh the actual risks ,on the ground’...

elgreco · 09/05/2020 17:41

Great news, excellent work.

littlbrowndog · 09/05/2020 17:13

Great work 2falls. Fucking great work

2fallsagain · 09/05/2020 16:54

Thank you WTF.

WTFSeriously · 09/05/2020 13:33

@2fallsagain Well done on your work here. This result is massive and adds to the ways other schools/LAs can be challenged. I hope the exposure from this brings you more new cases to pursue. And we'll all be here with spades when required WinkSmile

eurochick · 09/05/2020 12:55

I just came in to share the Times link but I see someone already has. Great coverage and a great result.

2fallsagain · 09/05/2020 09:46

Please share our commentary on OCC decision including our response to their statement. All here in the thread!

twitter.com/SafeSchools_UK/status/1259040550759665664?s=20

2fallsagain · 09/05/2020 08:21

Bumping for the morning crowd. If anyone is in LEAs with similar guidance please get in touch.

2fallsagain · 08/05/2020 23:56

Hello, ssauk person here. Just coming in to say thank you so much for all your support. We have mixed feelings about the withdrawal as would have liked a legal ruling. However, this victory is not to be underestimated and it. An be used in all kinds of ways. We have numerous questions for Oxfordshire CC we would like answered. We have had a manic few days dealing with press etc. We need to sit down next week and figure out what next. We have a number of options and a few strategies to consider.

If anyone is in an lea with this guidance and wants to challenge their guidance legally please get in touch with us. We can help. We have articles in the times and the mail tomorrow so hopefully a bit more awareness raising.

Thanks again!

truthisarevolutionaryact · 08/05/2020 12:39

Excellent points Michelleoftheresistance
In order to train in safeguarding, pastoral care, mental health for children and adolescents, people must have recognised and accredited experience and qualifications. It defies belief that schools are ignoring this. But it is the government who has been signposting schools to groups with appalling track records of appointing / employing people demonstrably unsuitable to work with / access children. And of course it's these groups and their 'allies" in the civil service / politics etc who viciously shut down all questions and challenges. Because once people start asking questions about the suitability of so many people currently being invited into schools to access children, this is what happens:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3830536-Drag-Queen-Story-Hour-in-Scottish-Primary-School

RoyalCorgi · 08/05/2020 12:37

I ask as o wonder what the next steps are, as there is not JR now?

Oxfordshire has said it will wait for the EHRC guidance (this was originally due out a couple of years ago but has been postponed). Other local authorities are still using guidance similar to the Oxfordshire ones. So I think there are two steps: one, ask the other local authorities whether they're planning to remove their guidance in line with the Oxfordshire and Warwickshire decisions and, if not, why not 2) write to the EHRC to find out if they are going to make sure their guidelines comply with the law.

Quillink · 08/05/2020 12:10

The first response is generally a dozy kind of interest that anyone's thought of this, followed by an 'oh fuck' moment when the risks are pointed out.

I find this incredible. Even to a lay person like me there are huge and obvious red flags in letting lobby groups write policy.

WTFSeriously · 08/05/2020 11:07

Due diligence. Safeguarding. Accountability.

This 👆 1000%

Michelleoftheresistance · 08/05/2020 11:01

And nobody, absolutely nobody , should be advising on safeguarding and policy, without holding any qualification or training in safeguarding. The lobby have sent out trainers, specifically to pressure safeguarding policy change, who haven't done so much as the basic course a school TA would be sent on. It's inexcusable.

Michelleoftheresistance · 08/05/2020 10:57

Parents also need to know who is coming into the school to speak to our kids.

Schools, NHS, Police, all organisations need to be alerted to the need to check credentials, do their homework and think before accepting a trainer, with it linked clearly to safeguarding. Since the revelation of one of the well known political lobby figures mentioned in an inquiry had not only no safeguarding knowledge but lacked the capacity to be able to understand safeguarding, I've been mentioning this to managers in various fields and making a point of asking for/checking and sharing my own credentials and pointing out the need to prove capacity, qualification and fitness to be doing anything potentially affecting policy and safeguarding.

The first response is generally a dozy kind of interest that anyone's thought of this, followed by an 'oh fuck' moment when the risks are pointed out. This lobby has got as far as it has on public trust and laziness, because no lobby has ever pulled this particular fast one before. Practice has to be sharpened up. No one should be training on the EquA, particularly expecting to direct and change policy, without qualifications and training to prove it, and with experience in the field, doing impact assessments, (the actual, proper kind that look at all groups interests, not just the one they like) and knowledge of practice and needs of all groups being affected.

Due diligence. Safeguarding. Accountability.

MrsSnippyPants · 08/05/2020 10:55

Here's a commentary on the Youtube video posted on the ReSisters Twitter thread.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1258654843813625856.html

Thanks to Sarah Stuart who does a lot of this kind of stuff, meaning we don't have to sit through it Smile Much appreciated.

The narcissism shines through. Is this someone who should be talking to 10 year olds?!

Swipe left for the next trending thread