Baroness Nicholson on twitter

Number 2 on the list is abandon safeguarding for children

Essentially it all boils down to 'these things would make a vulnerable group of males very happy and feel valued and safe if everybody did them.'

The trouble is that number one on the list of 'things to do' to achieve this lovely aim, is abandon all rights for females and compel them to be nothing more than props in the lives of these males, while thwarting their ability to protest about it.

Good point re the NSPCC. The Baroness has lots of links to children's organisations and charities, she is very well placed to look into the very worrying actions of hte NSPCC over recent years.

There's Munroe Bergdorf offering kids to 'pm' Bergdorf, and the bloke who took pics of himself in the toilets at work at the NSPCC, too, both defended at least initially by the NSPCC.

The Baroness is probably lucky enough not to have heard of the "cotton ceiling"......yet.

Someone on Twitter asked her if (paraphrased) she was aware that lesbians were labelled transphobic if they didn't sleep with transwomen.
She replied ??????
So she's on to that too.

GMB, the NSPCC and various politicians and advertisers refusing to engage with MN are organisations unwilling to listen to or accept the views of ordinary women.

We provide forum content, it is not provided by Justine and colleagues. They just provide the space, and moderate conversations. (Often more heavily than spaces predominantly used by men.)

I hope the good Baroness is starting to see the way women's views are policed on social media. It was probably always like that, except as a middle class educated and articulate woman and an elected MP, then Peer, she never saw it before.

Its the same utter male supremacist lunacy underlying 'you should have sex with a male person even if you're homosexual, don't want to and it will be a horrible experience for you because you should be focused on it's all about the male person and not about you, it's the right thing to do, females shouldn't really want to enjoy sex anyway because their bodies only exist for male people's purposes and they aren't really real humans, and you're actually only having those feelings in the first place because you're a bad person'.

It's medieval. This is 15th century bullshit back in Mac lipstick.

The NSPCC refused to go through with a webchat when they realised they were going to be faced with the very difficult cognitive dissonance they've been clinging on to.

It goes something like:

Here's our pants campaign. It's all really important. Tell children only they know when they're uncomfortable and something feels wrong. Tell children they should say no to being made to undress or show their body to someone else if it doesn't feel right. Your 'no' is not up for debate.

BUT if you're a female child and you're uncomfortable, it feels wrong and you want to say no because you're being asked to undress or go to the loo in front of a male child who wants to be treated as a female one...… it's naughty to feel uncomfortable or say no and you shouldn't do it, and you should be kind and do what the male child wants.

Safeguarding for females that must be predicated on male permission.

Right to say no or feel uncomfortable must be predicated on male permission.

If saying 'no' to males about your body might make them feel sad you must be kind and do what they want regardless of how you feel and if you don't you might get in trouble for hate crime.

You couldn't make it much worse. The NSPCC knew it would be a total car crash they'd never recover from.

Is she aware that the NSPCC refused to have a webchat on Mumsnet due to the controversy of trans children?? Or something along those lines

Ffs George. I hope she sends him the link of all the men's comments on reddit.

Wonder if she's seen those craven shites at GMB have pulled the MN chats?

She is after some more scalps (she said ‘okey dokey to this request from someone on twitter):

“I was wondering @Baroness_Nichol if you could send one to twitter, ask them to reinstate all the women they banned for saying gender is not a protected characteristic and those who used the wrong pronouns as it wasn't an offense?“

Female language just means woman/mother/daughter/sister/Ms/she etc, pronouns and the rest. Yep, "living as a woman" if you're male literally consists of persuading other people to lie about your sex.

Thanks all, that was really thought provoking.

What the fuck is "female language"?

I think it's language with long hair and lipstick.

Here it is @ChurchOfWokeApostate

Pronouns are Rohypnol
fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/

fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/

Could someone please pm me the rohypnol analogy? I’ve heard a lot about it, but haven’t seen it, and can’t find anything when I try and search.

What the fuck is "female language"?

Lamahaha Rhypnol words are in her inbox...

She's tweeted about pronouns -- hope someone directs her to Rohypnol...