We started off talking about a celebrity being styled to look like she was of African American heritage, though. So that's not quite the same as talking about a bunch of kids buying hoop earrings.
It's a weird picture and tbh I agree with PP who mentioned that getting a white woman to be artificially darkened for a shoot is bizarre when there is no shortage of women who are actually black who they could photograph for that aesthetic.
I also get how it is insulting.
But I don't get how some clothes and hairstyles are off limits, there's a world of difference between gelling baby hair at the hairline or temples and dying yourself black! And I agree, there's a world of difference between a girl rocking the look her friends all wear and a professional entertainer exploiting a look to make money.
Also, Latin American people in the US might not consider themselves white, but in Latin America someone who looks like Selena Gomez would be described as white by everyone. Latin Americans all have some Amerindian/indigenous blood and many have black/African blood as opposed to Spaniards or Portuguese from Europe (who might have Arab blood!)
But every country in Latin America has racism in media and white Latin Americans tend to be overrepresented in countries where they make up a minority of the population.
Someone like Christina Aguilera would look ridiculous in an Ecuadorian poncho, and she is half Ecuadorian.
Blackness is reported differently in the US, where the Jim Crow laws meant people with black ancestors were designated as black, compared to Brazil where people who are mixed race but light skinned are reported as white.
This led to much mocking of Shaun King, who is observably white, but who has claimed he is the result of an affair his mother had with a black man. In many other countries he would not be accepted as black by anyone because casual observations are made on appearance not ancestry.
On the other hand, George Zimmerman, who is observably Latin American with indigenous features, was reported as a white man when he killed a black boy.
In the US I would argue that there is cultural appropriation by Latin people who are adopting Black/"urban" styles. Is this a problem or is it ok because the two groups are both disadvantaged?
I'd also argue that a bit of Latin blood doesn't cancel out "white privilege" in the US, and that observably white Americans claiming to be oppressed minorities is as ridiculous as white men claiming to be non-binary. Ted Cruz is not in an oppressed minority, he's a white man.
Importing American arguments without taking into consideration the difference between there and anywhere else is always a problem.
I'd defer to what black women think on what they consider racist, but I am aware black women are not a monolithic group.