Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Covid-19 and purity spirals

684 replies

DreadPirateLuna · 09/04/2020 13:54

Covid-19 is a very serious illness which threatens our most vulnerable and risks overwhelming the NHS. We should all do what we can to flatten the curve and save lives. People whose behaviour risks lives (e.g. urban residents traveling out to holiday homes in rural communities) should face criticism and sanctions.

However, I can't help feeling that some of the outrage at some behaviours is less about reducing the spread and more about getting caught in a "purity spiral".

Take all the outrage about people in parks. Fresh air and sunshine is good for physical and mental health, it improves the immune system which is particularly important during an epidemic! Many urban residents have no other source of open space except the local park. The ability to get outside can be lifesaving for victims of DV. Risks of contracting disease are very low if you keep your distance from others outside your household.

Yet I've seen photos of walkers and family groups in parks, keeping far away from others, but accused of selfishness and killing the elderly and disrespecting the NHS. Parks in London have been closed, meaning more congestion of other areas and residents confined to homes, which is damaging for reasons outlined above.

And it's usually (though not exclusively) women and esp mothers who get blamed. Those selfish Karens and their broods.

A more sensible solution would be to allow restricted access to the parks. Maybe allow only locals in nearby flats without gardens. But it seems we're not doing sensible these days.

OP posts:
Dances · 10/04/2020 12:59

More finger wagging.

Dances · 10/04/2020 12:58

The suggestion that shopping baskets are policed is horrifying. But I suppose we can refuse. They cant jail us all..... That would be one big covid nightmare. Would be a good way of dealing with the dissenters right enough...

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 10/04/2020 12:58

3/10, needs more threats about martial law being imposed.

Hearhoovesthinkzebras · 10/04/2020 12:55

We have been given plenty of opportunities to police our own behaviour. The fact that some people seem to think that this is the right time to make a strike for.individual freedoms is the reason why stricter rules will be introduced, not because the police are power mad or because your next door neighbour secretly fancies living in North Korea.

Many of us want to have a life back - to see our children or parents, to go back to work, to continue with our hospital treatment that has been suspended. Why does your desire to sit on a park bench or sunbathe trump someone else's need to start chemotherapy or have a life changing operation?

You might be open mouthed in shock at how some.people like to stick to rules? Me, I'm open mouthed at just how selfish some people are.

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 10/04/2020 12:43

It seems like each force is making up its own rules as it goes along. Is there no centralised authority that could offer them some guidance after actually reading the law?

Binterested · 10/04/2020 12:41

And the police have handled this really badly. Threatening to search shopping baskets ffs.

Binterested · 10/04/2020 12:40

Totally agree. I always wondered how the stasi etc operated. Now I see how willing people are to put others in the wrong. My children have basically been told off every time they’ve stepped outside without me - each time they were either cycling up and down an empty street for exercise, playing football in an empty park for exercise or cycling through a park for exercise.

It’s scary. It also explains why people love the trans agenda. It’s a way to put women in the wrong with zero effort.

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 10/04/2020 12:38

I saw someone suggest that the army be sent in to deal with people buying non essential items last week. Perhaps martial law/police states sound more appealing to those who've never lived under one.

Dances · 10/04/2020 12:35

It really is Kittens
I'm horrified by the social scolding going on and the willingness to allow police the right unlimited powers by posters on here.

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 10/04/2020 11:46

This is all showing some fascinating patterns in terms of people with a need to control others. Lots and lots of them work for the police, but not all.

DreadPirateLuna · 10/04/2020 11:36

Here's another example:
www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/cabinet-minister-robert-jenrick-visited-his-parents-during-covid-19-lockdown

OMG, politician travels to visit parents, shock horror. But when you read down into the story, he traveled to drop off food and medicine, and he never entered the house. The rules allow for care of the elderly, including dropping off essential goods, so Jenrick wasn't breaking any law and he was actually reducing risks to his vulnerable parents. But that wasn't good enough for the scolds.

OP posts:
Hearhoovesthinkzebras · 10/04/2020 00:44

The people in the park last weekend weren't just sitting on a bench for a five minute breather were they? Again, if these activities are "no risk" why are those who are shielded not even allowed outside of their house? That must mean that there is a possibility of us catching it just by going for a walk, so there must be a greater chance of catching it by touching an object, like a bench.

2Rebecca · 09/04/2020 21:25

Covid 19 is far less infectious than chickenpox. It is mainly spread by droplet spread by prolonged close contact. The most neurotic person does not "win" the argument here. Parties and meeting up with people outside your household are banned. Sitting on a bench for 5 minutes part way through your walk isn't

Hearhoovesthinkzebras · 09/04/2020 20:58

Is sunbathing, having a picnic, sitting in the park permitted? No it isn't. We can go out to exercise or shop, not sunbathe or have s sit on the park bench.

Why are people so determined to make a stand or find a loophole? Doing that is increasing the risk each time either by coming into closer contact or by creating fomites. There is no chance that those individuals all maintained social distancing at all times in that park. MN has so many threads with people complaining about cyclists or joggers passing too close, dogs off leads coming up to them, young children getting too close. Each of those interactions is an opportunity to.pass the virus on. It's irresponsible and if they tighten the lockdown it will be the fault of everyone who thought it was ok to bend the rules.

JellyfishandShells · 09/04/2020 20:42

But they were in the vicinity of each other. Public gatherings aren't allowed.

It. Wasn’t. A. Public. Gathering.

It. Was. Individual. People. Exercising. Individually. In. A. Bloody . Great. Big. Space.

Not the football crowd you seem determined to imagine.

SpeedofaSloth · 09/04/2020 20:42

I agree OP, I have thought about purity spirals when looking at the local coronavirus support group on FB.

isabellerossignol · 09/04/2020 20:35

They weren't in the vicinity of each other. They were in a massive park keeping their distance.

Hearhoovesthinkzebras · 09/04/2020 20:30

But 400 people, or even 3000, weren’t all sitting on a bench ?

But they were in the vicinity of each other. Public gatherings aren't allowed.

Hearhoovesthinkzebras · 09/04/2020 20:28

I absolutely am expressing anger for those in power, and for those who voted them into power.

Do you have data to show that the people are working class? Regardless, I doubt the virus eases off because the person is working class. Why does class matter?

JellyfishandShells · 09/04/2020 20:28

But 400 people, or even 3000, weren’t all sitting on a bench ?

DreadPirateLuna · 09/04/2020 20:26

And can we please direct our anger at people in power who ignored this situation for far too long and are still not providing enough testing and PPE? Do we have to waste it on working-class people trying to get a bit of sun?

OP posts:
Hearhoovesthinkzebras · 09/04/2020 20:26

Or

Low risk - one person sitting on a bench

High risk - 1000 other people thinking " if they can do it, so can I" and then everyone thinking it's ok to relax the boundaries.

Either there's a rule in place or there isn't.

DreadPirateLuna · 09/04/2020 20:22

Low risk: person sitting in park by themselves

Increased risk: someone else getting close enough to tell that person they're breaking the rules

Higher risk: person meeting other people indoors where they can't be policed

Even higher risk: person spending 24 hours a day in a tiny flat with severe asthma/depression/violent partner

OP posts:
Hearhoovesthinkzebras · 09/04/2020 19:58

Gosh, are you suggesting that if I come down with severe coronavirus I should die alone rather than bothering the NHS? How sweet of you.Gosh, are you suggesting that if I come down with severe coronavirus I should die alone rather than bothering the NHS? How sweet of you.

If you go and do something that you've been specifically told not to do then I don't think you have right to expect healthcare workers to risk their lives in order to treat you.

And yes, going out of the house is low risk, not no risk as this poster said

If you are sitting on your own in a park far from anyone else, you are not going to catch or transmit the virus

A bench could well be a fomite

JellyfishandShells · 09/04/2020 19:56

400 people in a HUGE park, exercising - yes, of course , it is ok for them to be there. It is allowed, or do you not understand that ? I have just come back from a brisk walk in a huge park myself, with my DH. Quite a few people there but big distances between them - everyone behaving very well. Exercise is good for the immune system and good for general health .

Swipe left for the next trending thread