Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

It's nice to know that even now

56 replies

GloGirl · 31/03/2020 11:29

We are still keeping our birthing people at the centre of our focus with clear maternity guidance from my local hospital. So we don't confuse anyone.

Giving Birth

  • One birth partner is allowed when in labour. This will not change and is exempt from the general COVID 19 guidance.
  • Birthing people are being discharged home from the delivery suite wherever possible and birth partners can stay with you until you go home.
  • If you need to be transferred to the postnatal ward partners are not allowed to go with you.

From our local branch of Maternity Voices.

OP posts:
PhoenixBuchanan · 31/03/2020 17:18

Have they come up with a word to replace "maternity" yet?

I've seen them try.

I did a required online fetal wellbeing course recently (I'm a midwife) full of "birthing person" etc. The most egregious example was one of the options to a multiple choice question that referred to "fetal sleep or person sleep". I had to re-read it and initially had no clue what they were on about. Then I realised they had used "person sleep" as a stand-in for "maternal sleep". Confused

I let rip about that one in the feedback section. Unbelievable that they would use such convoluted and non-sensical language when we know that communication issues are a huge factor in unsafe care and poor outcomes.

Al1Langdownthecleghole · 31/03/2020 17:14

It literally conjures up the mental image of my vagina performing a function first, and my human existence second.
The focus is entirely upon the bodily process, not the woman with a name, personality and life.

That reminds me a some of my old school Nursing Tutors Barracker, who had no issues handing out major bollockings for anyone careless enough to refer to the "diabetic" in bed three.

Women. Know thy place.

Clymene · 31/03/2020 17:11

Yep: digital.nhs.uk/coronavirus/shielded-patient-list

'People who are pregnant'

FFS

Birthing people makes no sense at all. Much as I love the NHS, their painful capitulation to the wokerati makes me incandescent. It puts lives at risk.

FlamingoAndJohn · 31/03/2020 15:54

What about women who are struggling to read this information in their second language. This is just going to confuse them, it’s confusing enough in English.

Are there any translations of it? What does it say in other languages?

FlockofGulls · 31/03/2020 15:49

"Birthing people" ???

ummm, don't they mean "women" Hmm

FFS

JellySlice · 31/03/2020 15:42

'Birthing partner' - partner who helps with the birthing.

Therefore
'Birthing people' - people who help with the birthing, ie midwives, doctors etc.

Why do they want to discharge midwives and doctors straight home from the delivery suite? It doesn't make sense.

But then not much of the trans-pandering language makes sense.

BeetrootRocks · 31/03/2020 15:35

Really?

Clymene · 31/03/2020 15:27

Even the bloody shielding list talks about pregnant people with congenital heart defects Angry

BeetrootRocks · 31/03/2020 15:06

Tbh I don't think it's really about transmen.

It's about connecting the words female, woman etc to female biology. And the objection to that is from another group.

Bezalelle · 31/03/2020 15:03

What's possibly most galling about this is the surely TINY fraction of "transmen" who actually get pregnant and give birth. I don't have any figures to hand (if they even exist) but surely it's vanishingly rare. And yet language is being changed to suit them.

I have friends for whom English is a second language, and they wouldn't know what is meant by "birthing people".

BeetrootRocks · 31/03/2020 14:13

Any breeding stock whose biological birthing process commences will be supported by a gestationary expulsion practitioner.

BeetrootRocks · 31/03/2020 14:12

What is the government advice to potentially birthing people to follow when their biological mechanisms commence the process.

Birthing people would be shortened to birthers maybe aka breeders.

GCGayDad · 31/03/2020 14:11

Just saw this on a local health and exercise promotion body’s website (gmmoving.co.uk/blog/ways-to-keep-moving):

“MumFit is a pre and postnatal fitness service that is moving classes online to help keep pregnant people and new parents moving.”

It drives me fecking crazy! Angry The organisation posting this seems to have a totally female management team by the way (own worst enemy situation???).

However, the person running the actual classes for pregnant women is clearly much more sensible. On her site - www.mumfit.net/ - she writes:

“ MumFit offers a friendly, professional pre and postnatal fitness service to mums and mums to be.”

“ MumFit offers specialised personal training for new or expectant mothers on either a 1-to-1 or small group basis.”

“The female body goes through enormous changes during pregnancy and it can be both an exciting yet anxious time.”

Perhaps some of you might want to contact Mumfit and tell her that her services are being advertised for “pregnant people”?

BovaryX · 31/03/2020 13:16

'Birthing people?' There are any number of ways to interpret this clunky, baffling phrase. But the one thing it certainly does not suggest is pregnant women. More woke BS.

Cuntysnark · 31/03/2020 13:13

In fairness a HCP was being interviewed on the television and she referred to ‘the covids’. Made my blood boil.

MockersxxxxxxxSocialDistancing · 31/03/2020 13:08

What are other admissions to hospital called?

  • Fracturing People
  • Cancering People
  • Coronarying People
Gibbonsgibbonsgibbons · 31/03/2020 13:02

Oh I just can’t
That’s barely interpretable & English is my first (Only!) language.

Barracker · 31/03/2020 12:54

It's such an ugly phrase, apart from anything else.

"I am a pregnant woman"
"I am a woman in labour"
vs
"I am a birthing person"

It literally conjures up the mental image of my vagina performing a function first, and my human existence second.
The focus is entirely upon the bodily process, not the woman with a name, personality and life.

It's the polar opposite to 'woman centred care'

It's functional vagina and uterus attached to a nondescript human animal care.

LangSpartacusCleg · 31/03/2020 12:35

Given that some people (with a penis and without), say that ‘we are pregnant’, is it not possible that some people will assume that ‘birthing people’ means the couple rather than the mother?

TedsFederationRep · 31/03/2020 12:14

Have they come up with a word to replace "maternity" yet?

Very remiss of them. They clearly don't know their Latin roots.

"Birthing People Voices" should do the trick...by making it fully incomprehensible to everybody.

Thisismytimetoshine · 31/03/2020 12:13

I would have definitely assumed “birthing people” were the gang involved in the delivery - midwives/doctors/sundry other medical professionals.
They’ve managed to release a set of childbirth guidance without mentioning the word mother??!

littlbrowndog · 31/03/2020 12:10

I thought it meant partners as well. What is a birthing people.

Is that women ?

Why the shite. Just write the word women. It’s not a disgraceful word

BeetrootRocks · 31/03/2020 11:59

Thing is birth as a word directly refers to a female body thing so how long before that goes.

Ifonlyus · 31/03/2020 11:54

I had to read it several times for it to make sense. When I read birthing people my brain filled in birthing partners. Yep, great for health information literacy.

yetanotherusernameAgain · 31/03/2020 11:53

Have they come up with a word to replace "maternity" yet?

Swipe left for the next trending thread