Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Effects of corona virus on women

163 replies

ByGrabtharsHammerWhatASavings · 13/03/2020 09:28

Just thinking about the ways the virus and measures taken to combat it will effect women. The first thing that come to mind is that if children need time off school/ elderly people need caring for, it'll disproportionatly be women providing that care and probably taking time off work to do it. The second things is the way isolation and domestic abuse will correlate. Women in violent and abusive relationships will be trapped at home with their abuser in an increasingly tense claustrophobic environment. No chance of even escaping to a friends or him going for a walk to calm down. I can imagine that a lot of women will experience their first episode of violence if a long lockdown is initiated. It's also a controlling abusers dream situation. I have a friend whose husband is extremely controlling and does anything he can to limit and control her movements. He's basically got her imprisoned inside atm and won't let her go out til CV is over - for her own safety, of course Hmm. Shockingly there's no need for him to self isolate yet, but her and their kid absolutely must be in the house 24/7. It's like all his Christmases have come at once. It's the perfect excuse for abusers to isolate their partners from friends, family, maybe even a way to force them to give up work. And worst of all I don't even know if these effects can be mitigated.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
FemaleAndLearning · 14/03/2020 16:42

The concern for domestic abuse victims will be very real. I am a survivor and the year before I left we got isolated because if snow. It was hell, I couldn't escape with the baby and toddler and he was supposedly working at home. It was very stressful, intense and scary. The Freedom Programme uses the term The Jailer and many women will find themselves trapped if self isolation happens. Just awful to think about.

Siameasy · 14/03/2020 13:44

Have you read the thread tea? I mentioned BF because someone upthread asked about BFing. How is that “going on about breastfeeding”? Honestly “start a new thread” is laughable. The topic is about women and you aren’t in charge of what I say.

I said formula fed babies get ill more often. Don’t people deserve to know the truth even if it offends them? So they can make a fully informed choice?

It is not uncommon for BFing mothers to be told they need to stop BFing for all sorts of so-called health reasons when it is usually not necessary to stop.

Teateaandmoretea · 14/03/2020 08:37

Siamesy if you want to go on about the benefits of breastfeeding start a new thread.

Teateaandmoretea · 14/03/2020 08:35

Definitely continue breastfeeding. You don’t want to be reliant on formula. Formula fed babies are more likely to get ill.

I think the biggest issue is panic buying of formula and not being able to buy it. No evidence at all that FF puts baby at risk from coronavirus as very young children are less badly affected. Please be sensitive about what you post there will be scared mums who are FF.

In answer to the question OP I think Ireland sums it up. All the men who've been to the Cheltenham festival are flying back, during which time the schools have been closed 🤷🏻‍♀️. Make it the problem of women and children.

MN is depressing as well it's about 'competitive goodness' rather than pulling together and recognising all actions have consequences in the bigger picture (including closing schools, leisure centres, not going on holiday etc) Women having a go at women, I think it is one of the big powers that patriarchy has.

We also don't know that in the UK more men will die the smoking rates in China are massively higher in men.

londonloves · 13/03/2020 23:00

@Siameasy I'm aware of he generic stuff yes. Do you have any evidence that formula fed babies are more likely to get ill from corona? I though that was your implication.

Siameasy · 13/03/2020 22:19

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2812877/

It’s pretty mainstream information londonlife. Shouldn’t be controversial to state what is true, even if people don’t want to hear it. The link to NEC is well known and no one has the right not to be offended, particularly by something factual.

If you’re going to be annoyed by it be annoyed that the truth is withheld from you, repackaged as “breast is best” nonsense and wonder why that might be 🤔

londonloves · 13/03/2020 21:59

@Siameasy evidence for that claim about formula fed babies? Or just predictable formula bashing...

PlanDeRaccordement · 13/03/2020 21:23

I agree it is mostly women doing the invisible work, and it is nice to be recognised. But I felt the tweet was also subtly enforcing the gender role that the invisible work is women’s work. I’d rather have seen the tweet recognise all the invisible work without gendering it. If you thank the doctors you don’t tweet out let’s all recognise the fearless men who are working tirelessly to save their patients. You tweet out, let’s all recognise the fearless doctors. They could have done the same here, recognised the importance of the work without gendering it as women’s work. Just like when you recognise nurse or teachers, we all know the professions are women dominated but you don’t gender it because that communicates oh, that is women’s work, the “burden” of being a woman. Which implies that this work is not work for men to do or their burden.

Luckystar777 · 13/03/2020 20:36

Condoms? You're not meant to have sex if you're infected.

Siameasy · 13/03/2020 19:56

Definitely continue breastfeeding. You don’t want to be reliant on formula. Formula fed babies are more likely to get ill.

Hollywhiskey · 13/03/2020 18:40

@crazydiamond me too, and I'm tandem feeding. So if me or kids get ill we have to take to our bed together (including energetic toddler) whereas husband could go in another room. And oh god if either of them needed hospital I'd be screwed.

ByGrabtharsHammerWhatASavings · 13/03/2020 18:27

Interesting point plan - I agree that of course many men are fighting this, but by "burden" I assume they mean the "invisible work" that women never get acknowledged for. I used to be at med school so know a lot of doctors. Most of the female docs I know, unless they are becoming GPs, have put off having kids so far (we are mid 30s) as they don't have the time to take care of kids and advance their career. Many of the male doctors by contrast got married and had kids while still at med school and didn't even miss a beat because their wives immediately took over everything. Many of them are now working round the clock, which is amazing, but they all have a wife at home facilitating it. And why am I not a doctor myself, doing heroic work on the front line? Because I became pregnant during my studies and had to drop out. I was not the only woman on my course to drop out for this reason. So I appreciate the shout out from the WHO, that my contribution is valuable even if I'm just a SAHM rather than a doctor.

It would have been better maybe if instead of just "shining a spotlight" on the work women are doing, they actively encouraged men to share the load. Let's be real, most men are not front line doctors fighting the virus, most* men are sitting about taking the piss out of their wives for making sure they have enough nappies, then complaining when the football is cancelled.

*NAMALT

OP posts:
fascinated · 13/03/2020 17:54

You are right. But let’s be honest. It is mostly women carrying the domestic burden. It is nice to have it recognised. For once.

NeurotrashWarrior · 13/03/2020 17:52

Why can’t he care for the toddler?
He absolutely could but I'm still breastfeeding said toddler and cosleeping.

NeurotrashWarrior · 13/03/2020 17:50

Good point plan, hadn't seen it like that.

PlanDeRaccordement · 13/03/2020 17:20

I agree the assumption that women will be looking after the kids is annoying. But equally I found the WHO tweet upthread just as annoying by asking us all to recognise the womens work blah blah and the last sentence “women are carrying this burden” sent me raging. Like no man is working the front lines against this disease. Like the male Chinese doctor who identified this disease and raised the alarm and then DIED from it never existed. I just felt like the WHO should not be tweeting a world wide thank you to all women without also doing one thanking men. I also feel like they are making huge assumptions about and low key enforcing gender roles. Like you’re not doing your job as a woman if you’re not doing the caring work or nursing. It’s like that WWI Kitchener poster pointing at men saying “your country needs you” if you’re a man your duty is to enlist and go die in a trench. It seems it is a call to women to get in the trenches against COVID but in an approved feminine role.

Sexnotgender · 13/03/2020 17:11

Even the way it’s assumed is bloody annoying.

I was listening to the radio this morning and they said one of the reasons schools aren’t closing is because it would affect the NHS. Guy then said something like there wouldn’t be enough nurses because they’d be at home looking after the kids.

Yes I know there are male nurses but they are massively outnumbered by females.

Gave me the rage.

PlanDeRaccordement · 13/03/2020 17:11

Bygrab,
Yes it is interesting that men have higher risk of dying than women from covid-19.

My husband joked that all the years of men and their “man-Flu” whining have resulted in the universe granting them a real man-Flu to contend with.

PlanDeRaccordement · 13/03/2020 17:05

Well not quite newborn, she was six months old then.

PlanDeRaccordement · 13/03/2020 17:04

Neurotrash
“We have worked out thiugh, he could self isolate completely binging on Netflix for a week or two- but I couldn't because of the toddler”.

But the virus will make you sicker as you have asthma, With a 6.3% death rate for people with lung conditions, I would personally plan on the husband caring for the toddler, not you. Why can’t he care for the toddler? My husband took care of toddler and newborn once for three months straight when I was away on a long business trip. Men can do these things you know....

Aroundtheworldin80moves · 13/03/2020 16:31

I have a couple of rather immature male relatives (in their 40s, still living at home with their mother). Been spouting for weeks how it's all nonsense- why are people buying extra stuff etc.

Now Football been cancelled, it is affecting their lives....

SonicVersusGynaephobia · 13/03/2020 15:42

Good point upthread about how, by the time you or the baby gets CV symptoms the other will already have been exposed, so you may as well keep ng breastfeeding.

Thingybob · 13/03/2020 15:04

Can I add the impact the virus will have on us older women too, those in their 50s or 60s. Many of us are already do much of the care for elder parents/relatives and this will only increase due to self isolation, lack of outside care staff and lack of any specialist provision should our elderly relatives become.

NeurotrashWarrior · 13/03/2020 14:46

I'm actually the one a bit more laid back about viruses etc even though I have asthma. Years of working in schools taught me hand washing works but also, the buggers 🦠 get in via all ways.

Dh is very anxious about them as he doesn't understand the biology and immunity etc and so the explanations everywhere has been helpful at the least for him. I've been saying soap is the best thing for years.

We have worked out thiugh, he could self isolate completely binging on Netflix for a week or two- but I couldn't because of the toddler. Of course. Hmm

Though toddler is very daddy centric and after a magnificent tantrum today over a very minor thing, I'd like to see how that pans out...

ByGrabtharsHammerWhatASavings · 13/03/2020 14:37

Yes I expect there will be plenty of people saying that soon enough! The sad thing is though that if every family had 2 parents with one of them at work and the other at home, then things would be a lot smoother. That "traditional" set up could have been really good. But then men decided that it had to be the woman at home, and used our financial dependence to abuse and control us. And society made it easy for them to fuck off at the drop of a hat without any ongoing contribution to their children, leaving loads of women as single parents. And the work we did at home and in the community as treated as worthless and left unsupported, unvalued, and renumerated. And so now, shockingly, most women don't want anything to do with that kind of set up and most choose to work. Society can't have it both ways! Either being a SAHP is a valuable necessary contribution to society which we should be trying to make an economically viable choice for one parent to make, or its shit work, only worth doing by women, and its your own fault if you end up financially dependent on an abusive man.

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread