Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Transcribing request - Victoria Derbyshire programme.

41 replies

FloralBunting · 02/03/2020 14:46

Hi wims, I know there are brilliant transcribers among us, but with all the recent name changes, I'm not sure who to tag or PM about this!

Victoria Derbyshire had an interview with Polly Carmichael on her programme today 2/3/2020, and I'd really appreciate a transcription because Carmichael was really wily in her use of language, and at one point, during the crucial ability to consent question, said that children had specialist knowledge or something. I'd really like to be able to examine what was said with a bit more clarity.

Many thanks for any takers!!

OP posts:
endofthelinefinally · 03/03/2020 09:26

Not a medical doctor?
What sort of doctorate does she hold?

Most people would assume that someone with the title "Dr", in charge of a medical clinic, would have a medical degree and further medical qualifications.

Aesopfable · 03/03/2020 07:42

And as she says “I am not a medical doctor” - that will be news to many.

Aesopfable · 03/03/2020 07:41

I note Dr PC is clear that 13 year olds are not giving consent to CSH - she immediately distances herself from that. And yet if you know that nearly 100% of children consenting to puberty blockers go onto CSH? I can only conclude that she is confirming that they do NOT get consent from children for the medical pathway she is setting them down. That, regardless of ability to consent, consent is not even being sought.

AutumnCrow · 03/03/2020 00:02

Thank you - that's very useful

FloralBunting · 02/03/2020 23:39

Dr PC: No, that’s fine. But I guess… blockers… sorry – you were asking about informed consent. I think young people are able, My view is they are able to give informed consent. They are given full information round the intented action, the potential risks and so on. Over time, on more than one occasion. I think there is also evidence in general, that young people can develop, if you like, specialist areas of knowledge, beyond their developmental stage, if you like. when there’s been work around that particular area. I think that’s evidence that comes from pediatrics in general.

VD: Right. Do you mean why, because they are going online and joining forums so they have knowledge?

Dr PC: I think that’s very different. The knowledge that they obtain within the clinic is a robust knowledge based on the evidence. That’s not always the case online.

Highlighted the section which raises the most alarm bells, in amongst the verbiage and fibbage.

PC has been asked if a 13 year old can give informed consent for puberty blockers, which means being fully apprised of the potential risks and consequences and therefore able to truly weigh the decision.
She not only says yes, she says that the child can actually have a specialist area of knowledge beyond their developmental age. Remember she is saying this in response to a query about a 13yo consenting to medication which will halt their physical and mental development, via natural puberty, risking all kinds of attendant health problems, like bone weakening, etc, very possibly no mature sexual function, and which leads, in a huge proportion of cases, to cross sex hormones which will cement lack of fertility.

She is saying that children are capable of consenting to all that. I am going to be careful about spelling out exactly what I am driving at here, because although i think she is a snake oil saleswoman, I don't think she has nefarious intent, but these are PIE arguments. The suggestion that children can give consent because they are 'wise beyond their years' is incredibly dangerous.

I wish Kiera Bell all the luck in the world, not least because this is uncovering a terrifying level of foolish naivete in these circles that must be challenged.

OP posts:
FloralBunting · 02/03/2020 23:15

Superstar! Thank you!!

OP posts:
MangoesAreMyFavourite · 02/03/2020 23:09

@FloralBunting

Transcript above.

And here's the link from BBC iPlayer: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000g19g/victoria-derbyshire-02032020

MangoesAreMyFavourite · 02/03/2020 23:07

VD: Well, let’s talk now to Dr Polly Carmichael who is the Director of the Tavistock clinic, NHS clinic in London. Thank you very much for coming on the programme.

VD: How can you be absolutely sure when a child or teenager comes to your clinic that they do genuinely want to live as the opposite gender?

Dr PC: I think the first thing to say is this is a really complex area and the truth is you can’t ever be a 100 % sure about a lot of things and certainly in this area you can’t be a 100 percent sure.
Having said that, our assessment process is wide ranging. it’s over a long range of time.
We look at the development of gender, we look more widely at relationships and how young people are doing in school and so on. And, moreover, less than half of the young people who actually come to the service would ever be referred to the clinic. And for those that are, they continue to meet with psychosocial professionals, to explore their gender and importantly think about a whole range of pathways.

VD: Right. let’s talk more specifically about what happens if someone does come to your clinic then. How many therapy sessions would you have with a young person before puberty blockers would be part of the conversation?
Dr PC: ok, so we work according to NHS specifications. We are a commissioned service and in the specifications it says 3-6. I think in reality…

VD: That’s an hour long?
Dr PC: That’s an hour long, maybe longer sometimes, with two clinicians, I guess that’s around giving young people a space, but also giving their parents a space.

VD: And over what period of time would those 3-6 sessions be?

Dr PC: So… it would vary. it’s all individual, it’s case by case but over a period of six months or so. But I think it’s important to say that the reality is one outcome of the assessment period is not infrequently, ongoing exploration and thinking

VD: rather than at the end of that period prescribing puberty blockers

Dr PC: Yes

VD: 3-6 sessions, each about an hour long, 2 clinicians over a period of about six months - does that strike you as not enough therapy and over too short a period?

Dr PC: So, I think if it were that after that period everyone was being referred to clinic, then I think there would be rightly questions. But the truth is often it’s much longer than that. And indeed, I think we are well aware of some of the concerns that have been coming out more recently around large increases in numbers of referrals, there have been concerns about more assigned females being put forward for services. And I think within that, if anything, we are more cautious, more careful.
We also have a network model, so young people come from all over the country. And we convene professionals meetings locally and many of the young people we see have co-occurring difficulties and so it’s most appropriate really that any therapeutic input happens locally.

VD: Right. How can a child or teenager give their full informed consent to taking puberty blockers? That’s what critics suggest they can’t and Kiera Bell is one of them.

Dr PC: Yeah, so… Obviously people over the age of 16 are able to give consent. And the consent process we have is a robust one, it’s a process, it’s not an event. it’s not one occasion where you obtain consent. But I think it’s involved in numerous discussions around thinking about all the different pathways. If an individual is pressing for any physical intervention there would be extensive discsussions around their hopes for that, their expectations, ensuring they are realistic. There would be discussion around potential side effects, known side effects, unknown ones, unknown unkowns. And all of this before a young person even gets referred to the clinic. And then formal consent would be taken within the endocrine clinic. The first visit would only ever be a full discussion from a medical doctor around the treatment. And education and so on.
And so formal consent would never be taken until at least the second meeting.

VD: Right. Again, is that too soon. And again, how can a 13 year old really give formal consent for taking puberty blockers, taking cross sex hormones?

Dr PC: Well, a 13 year old isn’t giving consent for taking cross sex hormones. There’s a lot of misinformation and

VD: Lets stick with puberty blockers, lets just stick with that. Sorry, that was my mistake

Dr PC: No, that’s fine. But I guess… blockers… sorry – you were asking about informed consent. I think young people are able, My view is they are able to give informed consent. They are given full information round the intented action, the potential risks and so on. Over time, on more than one occasion. I think there is also evidence in general, that young people can develop, if you like, specialist areas of knowledge, beyond their developmental stage, if you like. when there’s been work around that particular area. I think that’s evidence that comes from pediatrics in general.

VD: Right. Do you mean why, because they are going online and joining forums so they have knowledge?

Dr PC: I think that’s very different. The knowledge that they obtain within the clinic is a robust knowledge based on the evidence. That’s not always the case online.

VD: Keira Bell was 16 – so she was able to give informed consent as a 16 year old, Regrets. she says that your clinic did not challenge her enough. Do you accept that?

Dr PC: I think we do challenge, without a doubt. My heart goes out to Kiera. I think Kiera is incredibly brave and speaks really well. I think it’s really important that individuals can come forward. there’s a place for them and there’s a place to discuss this. But this needs to be kept in a context. The detransition rate is, across studies, very low, 0.3 to about 3%. And also detransition means many things. So, for most, the reason that is given is around a lack of social acceptance, the loss of family and peer support. So, I think, whilst it is really important to think about that, we also need to hold in mind the many people who go forward and can lead a full life with support around their gender identity.

VD: My son, this is from a viewer, my son started with the Tavistock when she was at the time 13 years old. They’ve spent years cancelling before treatment and the only argument I have is that at nearly 24 years, he is still awaiting the final treatment. This caused depression and anger with things not moving quickly enough. I understand this but I wish my son to feel complete and happy with himself.
In terms of the puberty blockers, you will know that those who criticize the use of them in young people say this is experimental treatment that can have life long consequences, you are using a drug which is most commonly used to or licensed to treat advanced prostate cancer in men and to chemically castrate male sex offenders. And to halt very early puberty, it is not licensed to treat gender dysphoria in children, that is true , isn’t it?

Dr PC: So, I’m not a medical doctor but I think you will find that many drugs used in pediatrics are not licensed for use in children.

VD: Do you have any worries about the long term effect on individuals, psychologically , on their brain development, on their fertility? We don’t know what they can do to people.

Dr PC: Well, the blocker has been used for over 30 years so I think , there is actually quite an evidence base. Clearly it is really important, as numbers increase, awareness increases, that there is more research. But I think you have to weigh this up against the effects of not intervening. We are talking about young people whose sense of themselves does not match their physical body and the distress associated with that is often huge.

VD: Finally, let me ask you why you think there has been an explosion in referrals of young people to gender identity clinics. In 2009 -10 there were 77 referrals; 2018-19 – it’s gone up to two and a half thousand. That is a 3263% increase. it’s astonishing. Why?
Dr PC: Well, that’s a really difficult question. I guess there are multiple reasons for it. We need to hold in mind, as much as we are talking about transgender people much more, actually, this continues to be a marginalized, stigmatized group. And so, part of that, I think is likely to be greater awareness and that can be nothing but positive. But, of course, we are also aware that there may be changes in the demographics and that we need to be, if anything, more cautious. And I think, as a clinic, that is exactly the approach we take.

VD: thank you very much for coming on the program. We appreciate your time this morning, Dr Poly Carmichael, Director of The Tavistock. Thank you.

MangoesAreMyFavourite · 02/03/2020 23:06

VD: Victoria Derbyshire
Dr PC: Dr Polly Carmichael – Director, Tavistock Clinic
KB: Kiera Bell
AH: Alison Holt (BBC)

Starts at 27: 50 minutes in…
VD: Next a 23 year old woman is taking legal action against an NHS gender identity clinic saying that she should have been challenged more by medical staff about her decision to transition to a male as a teenager.
A judge gave the go-ahead last week for a full hearing of the case against the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, which is expected to go to the heart of the controversy surrounding the age at which young people become capable of giving informed consent to medical interventions to help change their gender.

In a moment we will speak to the boss of the clinic Dr Polly Carmichael
But first lets hear from the woman – she’s called Kiera Bell. She’s now 23 and she started taking puberty blockers aged 16, followed by cross sex hormones, testosterone in her case, and she had a double mastectomy

Kiera bell has been speaking to the BBC’s Alison Holt

KB: I would have liked to have … some sort of intensive therapy really. I think that I should have been challenged on the proposals or the you know the claims that I was making for myself and I think that would have made a big difference as well.

AH: There will be young people who say going to the clinic literally saves their lives because it is essential someone listens to them and believes their need to change.
What would you say to that?

KB: Well, I did say the same thing you know years ago when I went to the clinic. It felt like it was saving me from suicidal ideation and and just depression in general.
At the time I felt like it relieved all of those mental health conditions that I was you know, struggling alongside, you know, gender dysphoria. It’s something you need to kind of work through but it’s not something that should be rushed into.

I think it’s up to these, you know, institutions like the Tavistock to step in and make children reconsider what they are saying because it is , you know, a life altering path that you are going down and it’s not guaranteed to work.
AH: Do you feel any anger about what’s happened in the last 5-10 years for you?
KB: I do, yeah. I felt angry that, you know, no one was there to really say any different and I was allowed to run with this idea that I had, you know almost like a fantasy as a teenager I was allowed to run with that and it has affected me in the long run as an adult.

R0wantrees · 02/03/2020 15:48

I havent watched today's episode yet.
Im steeling myself.

I have though rewatched Victoria Derbyshire promoting that very young children might somehow be 'born in the wrong body' back as far as 2015.

endofthelinefinally · 02/03/2020 15:43

Thank you for explaining it better ROwantrees.
I just remember switching the TV off one morning as she was annoying me so much. I have deliberately avoided watching her show since then.
I just wondered if she had changed her approach at all.

AutumnCrow · 02/03/2020 15:25

I think the children's safeguarding element of this - and the judicial reviews - are giving a lot of people in the media a real scare, and quite rightly so, as these journalists and presenters realise just what they've been condoning.

I missed the VD Show segment, so would also really appreciate a link to a clip, or a transcript.

R0wantrees · 02/03/2020 15:25

Its not to do with being 'woke' as such.
Victoria Derbyshire has actively promoted Mermaids Charity for years & also failed to challenge trans rights activists.

endofthelinefinally · 02/03/2020 15:18

Is Victoria Derbyshire slightly better informed these days? I seem to recall that a year or so ago she was very woke and completely on the side of woke people.

FloralBunting · 02/03/2020 14:52

Thanks Mangoes, it's not my skill set at all!

OP posts:
MangoesAreMyFavourite · 02/03/2020 14:49

I can have a try. Give Pombear and Pencils a break

Swipe left for the next trending thread