So much for me being brief:
Dear Mr Vickery,
Thank you for your response of the 13th February. You state that you hope you can sufficiently answer any further questions I may have, but have failed to respond to most of the questions I asked in my email of the 22nd January. Perhaps you could answer those then we can move on from there?
Also, you stated: Under the Equality Act, trans people should be treated according to the gender with which they identify.
I am unable to find the part of the EqA2010 that states this, perhaps you would be so kind as to send me the relevant quote? I am pretty certain it states no such thing, but will be happy to be corrected.
Again, you stated: Anybody seeking access to spaces such as toilets or changing rooms for malicious or violent purposes can and should be dealt with under existing criminal laws.
Mr Vickery, the whole point of safeguarding, of providing women and girls with single sex spaces, is to PREVENT harm. Not one single woman or child should suffer harm due to single sex spaces being made mixed sex, not one. Single sex spaces provide one of the best protections for women and girls; an absence of men. Dealing with a crime afterward is no consolation to victims, when simple safeguarding measures would have prevented the crime in the first place.
Finally, if you feel unable to respond to this email fully, then perhaps it would be much easier if I just pass on this correspondence trail to my MP and ask him to contact the Minister directly? I really would not want to take up your time if you are unable to provide the answers to my questions.
Please respond as soon as possible, as this issue is very pressing for women and girls who are seeing the law being wilfully misrepresented by lobby groups across all government departments, especially in the NHS and in schools.
Kind regards,