Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

nikah marriage and divorce

55 replies

BluebonicPlague · 15/02/2020 00:49

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-51508974
The couple had an Islamic wedding ceremony in a west London restaurant in 1998 in the presence of an imam and about 150 guests, but no civil ceremony subsequently took place, despite Mrs Akhter repeatedly raising the issue.

They separated in 2016 and Mr Khan tried to block his wife's divorce petition two years ago on the basis they had not been legally married in the first place.

Am not Muslim so feel unqualified to comment much on this. But on first principles I wonder if
a) mostly, people assume nikah marriage is legal and protected under English law
b) mostly, people don't assume that and prefer to be governed by shariah law
c) people don't have a clue
d) actually some people do have a clue and don't care

Somehow, I suspect c) and d).
It's tragic if so. It means that some Muslim women are woefully unprotected when marriage breaks down. One solution might be to license imams to conduct marriage ceremonies, but that's not going to help people already stuck in damaging scenarios.
What should we be doing to improve matters?

OP posts:
Goosefoot · 15/02/2020 02:44

It's not all that uncommon for non-Muslims to make incorrect assumptions about their rights and status, and what will happen if there is a separation, if they have been living together long-term without being married. I think many people have some confusion about this.

frazzledasarock · 15/02/2020 02:10

IME

A lot of Muslim women aren’t aware their nikah isn’t a legal marriage in England. They only find out when things go wrong.

A lot of mosques are now licensed for legal marriage contracts.

The mosques which aren’t tell the couple this beforehand, I know of a mosque which won’t conduct nikahs unless the legal marriage has been conducted.

Some couples are aware that nikahs are not legally binding but prefer that if they don’t want a legal wedding immediately for whatever reason. Eg they want to live together and both have independent wealth and don’t want to lose it if things don’t work out.

I personally think the nikah officiant should make it crystal clear that the nikah is not legally binding (if the mosque isn’t authorised to conduct legal marriages), and inform both parties that in the event of a divorce or death the mosque can do nothing to settle financial disputes or inheritance matters.

I’ve seen a lot of women also assume that as they’ve been long term in a nikah that it’s considered common law marriage. I’ve had to tell so many women that’s not the case.

If a couple are happy to only have a nikah knowing full well in the event of a divorce one of them will end up with the same rights as a cohabiting couple. Then that’s up to them.

ErrolTheDragon · 15/02/2020 01:55

Sign a form in a government office and boom, you married. Then have whatever ceremony you want.

That's what adherents of other religions do - and IME (though that's limited) in that order. Wouldn't the simplest solution (to prevent further cases) be for imams to insist on seeing the legal paperwork before allowing the religious ceremony? What possible justification could there be for them not doing this?

Purpleartichoke · 15/02/2020 00:59

The only thing that should matter from the perspective of the state is the paperwork. Specific locations, officiants, etc is just window dressing. Sign a form in a government office and boom, you married. Then have whatever ceremony you want.

ArranUpsideDown · 15/02/2020 00:56

The One Law for All conference covered this last year with excellent contributions from a number of sources including Southall Black Sisters - SBS has issued this press release:

southallblacksisters.org.uk/press-releases/akhter-v-khan/

Swipe left for the next trending thread