Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Scottow verdict: Guilty

384 replies

DeployTheTut · 14/02/2020 10:46

I have no words. Reports from Joani Walsh and Maya Forstater at the Trial in St Albans

twitter.com/mforstater/status/1228261217212522497?s=21

twitter.com/joaniwalshi/status/1228259484801359872?s=21

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
theflushedzebra · 19/02/2020 19:17

I'm not sure the police would be quite so quick off the mark to prosecute someone who, say, insulted someone in a wheelchair, with a comparable insult.

I don't think the courts took reasonable account of the fact that Kate had blocked Hayden on twitter - so how was it harassment?

Plus there seemed to be incorrect info about tweets said either in court, or in the reporting of the case - if someone retweets something from an account that blocked you, you don't get to see it, it says "tweet unavailable" and tweets from protected accounts cannot be retweeted at all. It's pretty unlikely that you'd come across a tweet from an account that has blocked you - unless you purposely look for it.

Good luck Kate Thanks

BustedWench · 19/02/2020 19:17

I wasn't found guilty of abusing TW. I was found guilty of being annoying... Which I'm finding some posters on here are Grin

Datun · 19/02/2020 19:15

Exactly. Nice legs, shame about the face, sixteen-sixty, spot the grot - the list is endless. From tart with a heart, to Ho Ho Ho.

Why is it so much worse when it's directed to a trans person, rather than a woman?

Lordfrontpaw · 19/02/2020 19:05

Yup. It’s all part of being womanly surely - along with cat calling, told to ‘cheer up luv’ and getting your bum pinched. Same old same old, didn’t realise the police would take me so seriously...

Cascade220 · 19/02/2020 18:59

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MissChardonnay · 19/02/2020 18:51

But surely from a legal perspective this is no different from using another protected characteristic as the focus of your insults - e.g. insulting somebody for being disabled or a POC.

Lordfrontpaw · 19/02/2020 18:45

But sauce for the goose ought to be sauce for the gander...

MissChardonnay · 19/02/2020 18:43

Two wrongs don't make a right.

MrsSnippyPants · 19/02/2020 18:42

Go and read the whole thread MissChardonnay.

Then you will see you are a little bit misinformed.......

Lordfrontpaw · 19/02/2020 18:32

Yet death and rape threats stand. What a curious system we have in this country.

MissChardonnay · 19/02/2020 18:30

I feel sorry for Maya Forstater and think the demands of the TRA brigade are a bit ridiculous at times. However, unless I'm not getting the full story, this case seems a completely different scenario.

Scottow seems to have created multiple accounts with the sole intention of abusing a TW online, and was specifically targeting her trans status - e.g. 'pig in a wig'.

Can't say I feel particularly sorry for her...

Amalfimamma · 19/02/2020 16:19

penguin

Its hayden advertising their own account 😂😂😂

PenguindreamsofDraco · 19/02/2020 16:16

Can we not advertise Hayden's twitter here? I'm sure people will look anyway if they have any interest in what Hayden has to say. It just feels wrong to be flagging it up, since Hayden is (in my opinion) no friend to women however Hayden identifies.

Amalfimamma · 19/02/2020 15:41

jenner

Course you're not.

I do love how you're spinning though. Apart from Kate and harrop you've not had much support have ya? As for harassment I'd have a wee look at your own Twitter time line and the numerous attacks you've been posting in recent days.

Oh how much fun is coming in the next few weeks.

JennerOfKensington · 19/02/2020 15:38

Amalfimamma If you are suggesting I am SH then you are wrong. The thread is about Kate who was convicted last week in court of a criminal offence. On the other hand I do not have a criminal record of any description and I don't think it's in the spirt to just make assumptions and attack me.

Amalfimamma · 19/02/2020 15:21

Ho jenner and welcome to mumsnet.

Can you please put in another defamation report demanding I delete messages or hand over my details to you? Seeing as we all now know you can't practice law and your extensive criminal record, well part of it z is is now public knowledge?

Ta very much

JennerOfKensington · 19/02/2020 14:06

It will depend on which route the appeal goes. An appeal to the Crown Court is just a rehearing of the case before a judge and two magistrates. If it goes case stated to the High Court then that will result in a precedent.

Melroses · 19/02/2020 14:01

would that set precedent No precedent - it is the lowest rung of the court system.

The other situation is more about the police and CPS.

Lordfrontpaw · 19/02/2020 11:49

They are a parent then?

DuLANGMondeFOREVER · 19/02/2020 11:36

The parenting show on three counties radio? 😂😂😂

Not quite the media commentator high life 😂😂😂

Alltheprettyseahorses · 19/02/2020 10:30

Out of interest, if the verdict stands in Kate's case (and I don't think it should), would that set precedent for the same verdict if a case was made regarding the fascinating link above or for what Caroline Whatsherface has experienced?

Gibbonsgibbonsgibbons · 19/02/2020 10:00

KBO Kate Flowers we want to dig

Lordfrontpaw · 19/02/2020 09:58

💐

BustedWench · 19/02/2020 09:56

A complaint has been made, in writing, to the BBC3CR biased reporting on the trial and outcome, an appeal to the high court has also begun.

Unfortunately, I am limited to what I can and cannot discuss, hence why I've been relatively quiet since December 2018, but things are in motion and all will be revealed when safe to do so.

JennerOfKensington · 19/02/2020 09:07

Ironically Ms Hayden was on the Parenting Show on BBC Three Counties Radio last night talking about the Scottow verdict and trolling.

twitter.com/flyinglawyer73/status/1229879894877888512

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.