Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Douglas Murray on denunciations and Lawrence Fox

430 replies

BovaryX · 21/01/2020 08:08

Douglas Murray takes aim at the cancel culture and denunciation tactics at the heart of # no debate. Those who try to control and police what people think and say have dominated public discourse to its detriment. Many are aware of the existential threat to freedom of speech this faction represents.

Nothing that Fox said on Question Time was at all controversial. He suggested that the Labour party leader might be selected on merit and he suggested that Britain is not a racist country. Both these sentiments are held by the majority of the public. Yet so dominant have the minority-opinion pushers become that many people are persuaded that it would not just be career-damaging but socially fatal to say anything to the contrary. Even when that thing is the truth

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
BovaryX · 30/01/2020 14:30

and specifically, how did we get here despite 10 years of the Conservatives being in government?

That is an excellent question. The explanation, I think, is that like most politicos, they were Generals fighting the last war, tripping over themselves to apologise for being Conservative. 'Call me Dave' was in a coalition after 13 years of Blair and he had no desire to promote Conservative principles. Like freedom The Conservatives have stated that they will address the existential threat to freedom of speech in academia. When do they plan to do this? When an academic is beaten to a pulp because someone objects to her research conclusions? Meanwhile, the colonisation of public discourse by an increasingly intolerant, irrational outrage brigade, was exacerbated by social media. And that has enabled the targeted hounding of people who, as Douglas Murray says, detonate in the Twitter landmine.

OP posts:
andyoldlabour · 30/01/2020 14:27

It turns out that Martin Shapland is well known on twitter for his racist remarks about white people.

twitter.com/search?q=@mshapland&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch

Floisme · 30/01/2020 14:16

What was interesting I thought about that Guardian article was that it began by recognising firstly that Fox was articulating a mainstream opinion, and secondly that the woke needed to wake up.
But it was as if O'Hagan couldnt bear to think that through so she retreated behind the usual lazy, ageist lines about bigotry, that sadly I've come to expect from The Guardian.

IcedPurple · 30/01/2020 14:10

I think, as others have said, that 'cancel culture' and the growing Americanisation of public life - as well as the instantaneous nature of social media - have played a big role in bringing us to this sorry state. Look at the Alistair Stewart case for a current example. If the choice is between nuance and a baying Twitter mob, the latter will win every time. It's just not worth the risk of taking them on.

BolloxtoGender · 30/01/2020 14:04

..and specifically, how did we get here despite 10 years of the Conservatives being in government?

Goosefoot · 30/01/2020 13:57

It is not incidental that accusations of racism and bigotry have assumed such prominence. It is a deliberate tactic of the # no debate crew. You can see examples of it on this very thread.

that is the situation now, how those words are being used. But that usage is predicated on the accusations themselves already holding a lot of power. That happened before the current climate became overheated.

Something that always sticks in my mind when contemplating this is a passage from a P.D. James novel. One of the characters, a female police officer, is thinking about her education in a secular state school that served a mainly underprivileged kids from housing estates. She says that the only real philosophy or religion they were taught was anti-racism, and everyone getting along, and that this was heavily pushed. Which she seems to think is as good a religion as any.

That's not anything like a full explanation, but I think it's an interesting and largely accurate observation on the part of the author with regard to public education. SometimesI wonder if it isn't meant as a sort of pacification endeavour for the masses but then I think I am getting into tin-foil hat territory.

But my basic question is, how did we get to a place when an accusation of bigotry or racism is just accepted almost without real examination, and that people are so desperate to avoid such an accusation that they will undertake significant mental or social gymnastics to do so?

BolloxtoGender · 30/01/2020 13:33

Substitute the words 'racist' and 'bigot' with 'capitalist roader' or 'bourgeoisie' , then you can see lots of parallels of the dynamics of how this could play out in the Cultural Revolution of Communist China. And it is scary.

Needmoresleep · 30/01/2020 13:31

This DM article abour Alistair Stewart is worth skimming

mol.im/a/7946269

It hits a good score on the identity politics bingo: 'white privilege', LibDems etc. Stewart's colleagues seem to standing up for him against the bosses.

TheRealMcKenna · 30/01/2020 11:41

I’m cautiously optimistic. The fact that this is a thread in the Feminism section and the title has the trigger words ‘Douglas Murray’ in it and there have been barely any accusations of ISLAMOPHOBE or MISOGYNIST shows that there is a willingness out there to challenge the accepted ‘woke’ narrative and debate the issues more sensibly.

If this thread had been created three years ago I think the discussion would have been very different.

BovaryX · 30/01/2020 10:52

nauticant
Thank you for posting the link, haven't looked at it yet, but I will. Just extraordinary shenanigans in universities.
MsSafina
I think that is a very interesting point about the cultural revolution. There is a Year Zero fanaticism gaining ground and it is very disturbing

OP posts:
IcedPurple · 30/01/2020 10:49

The Guardian has been going after the 'liberal' American market for some time now. A lot of its journalism in the past 5 years or so needs to be read in that context.

shedquarters · 30/01/2020 10:38

Comments allowed on guardian twitter site. Generally not woke friendly.

IcedPurple · 30/01/2020 10:21

That must be the 100th article in The Guardian about Laurence Fox - he must be absolutely loving it as 2 weeks ago most people didn't know who he was.

The article is a bit of a word salad, and of course no comments allowed, but the funny thing is that so many Guardian hacks come from a middle class, privately educated, Oxbridge set not dissimilar to Fox's 'white privilege'.

BovaryX · 30/01/2020 09:59

andy

That paper is a propaganda machine which doesn't cover inconvenient news It hasn't bothered to report the fact that an Oxford professor requires bodyguards because trans activists don't like her research conclusions. Those who are outraged by trivia and silent on outrages are a very unreliable source of news.....

OP posts:
andyoldlabour · 30/01/2020 09:50

The Guardian is not letting up on the Laurence Fox story. This has a bit of casual ageism in it, not unexpected stuff from this rag.

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jan/30/anti-woke-backlash-liberalism-laurence-fox

"Primarily, older, white, homeowners and pensioners"

As the aftermath of the general election showed, the "woke" left has no ability to self reflect. Apparently Jeremy Corbyn is going to start a tour of the Labour heartlands in the North, to lecture them about socialism - good luck on that Jezzer, I suggest you kick off with Blythe.

HelgaHere1 · 30/01/2020 06:59

The Students from Asian backgrounds are outperforming the rest in American unis. Getting the best scholarships, best results, but on the Yale video were calling themselves oppressed coloureds, apart from Grace.
In reply to Good grief.
Yes. Yes there are. Nobody said there weren't I don't think?
And God FORBID a man might get pissed off at all the talk of women's rights because he didn't get the top job either
That's it then. FWR, shut up shop. A man might be pissed off somewhere.

That man might be your son who has spent a year job hunting or your husband.
I was pointing out a fact not saying it shouldn't happen, pointing it out as obviously there are winners and losers in this and it's unlikely the losers will cheer on the winners.

BovaryX · 30/01/2020 06:37

It comes back to that question though, how did accusations like racist and bigot gain that power? It almost seems like they are magical words that you invoke to take away the power of your enemies

That's a very interesting question Goosefoot It is not incidental that accusations of racism and bigotry have assumed such prominence. It is a deliberate tactic of the # no debate crew. You can see examples of it on this very thread. This is the playlist. Make an immediate, unsubstantiated accusation of racism/bigotry. This will distract from the idea being discussed and focus attention on the speaker. It also serves as a warning to anyone watching that they too will be vilified if they dare dissent. White liberals are particularly vulnerable to this. Many just crumble when accused, no matter how ludicrous the accusation This is control speech, smear tactics and intimidation deployed by people who don't believe in debate, freedom of speech or diversity of opinion. They believe in silence and submission.

OP posts:
shedquarters · 29/01/2020 20:55

It seems to be due in a big part to the public shaming phenomenon on social media. Anything that ever happens, some twat is filming it and uploading it, others are commenting on it and rating it. Add that to cancel culture and intersectional politics, and bobs your uncle, fanny's your aunt.

Goosefoot · 29/01/2020 20:43

It comes back to that question though, how did accusations like racist and bigot gain that power? It almost seems like they are magical words that you invoke to take away the power of your enemies.

TheRealMcKenna · 29/01/2020 16:32

The most interesting part of the video to me was the girl who said (not exact words) that it’s less of a risk to be a protester and be wrong than to be considered a racist.

You could easily substitute ‘racist’ with ‘misogynist’ or ‘transphobe’ to describe why so many people stay silent on all sorts of issues they feel strongly about.

shedquarters · 29/01/2020 16:25

Nauticant
As a 'woman of a certain age' I decided to study for a degree. Visited a university, used the GN loo, looked around at all the students, and decided to go to the local college instead. Best decision. No regrets.

andyoldlabour · 29/01/2020 16:22

TheRealMcKenna

My wife has told me plenty of stories about her university in Tehran at the start of the revolution. Some students were smashing windows in the cafeteria and half a dozen police turned up with riot batons. I think students in Iran today have far more serious issues to protest than dining cards. That was the most surreal part of the video as far as I am concerned.

andyoldlabour · 29/01/2020 16:16

nauticant

"By the time I was done I felt like my grip on reality was much weaker than it had been."

Grin Happened to me back in October 2018, when I saw the podium shot of the World Master's Track Championship. In the comments section of the viseo, someone said those students reminded them of "Lord of the Flies".
nauticant · 29/01/2020 16:13

That's also for you shedquarters. How to lose 5+ hours of your time and end up utterly disillusioned about what universities are now for.

nauticant · 29/01/2020 16:11

andyoldlabour: a while back I went through all of Benjamin Boyce's Complete Evergreen videos over a couple of weeks.

www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRdayXEOwuMG9DG66Bvx6YbUnhw-buS5K.

By the time I was done I felt like my grip on reality was much weaker than it had been.

Swipe left for the next trending thread