She is standing squarely behind a policy that removes the right of any female at any time to be able to have any privacy from any male that wishes to be present, regardless of how vulnerable, humiliated or frightened that may make that female. All females must poo beside males. Pee beside males. Undress beside males. Sleep beside males. Accept intimate care from males. Accept this and get your pants off, and don't let the male see you cry or it's a hate crime.
Or, for the many females who can't and won't tolerate this - many for protected characteristic reasons - those females lose access to female single sex services.
In order to provide people born male with a choice of two services to use, and to make sure that their feelings are respected.
Words fail. Leaving aside the whole homophobic aspects, racist aspects, anti faith aspects, anti safeguarding aspects - Jess, there is no point in you worrying about women having to sell access to their bodies to males, when you're depriving women of any bodily respect, privacy or equal humanity. You are rendering females a subclass. A subordinate class.
Own it. If you are going to do these abhorrent things, have the guts to face those females and face up to the realities of what you are doing to them.