Your disability might set you apart, but isn't the message of inclusion a good one for small children?
Would to rather a book that said no, don't play with or include as much as possible children with disabilities in your game?
Your post here is talking about the message the book could give to able bodied children about children with disabilities. I'm talking about the message that it gives to children with disabilities.
I'm only going on what people here are saying about the book. Personally, I don't think it's good if it's saying to a child with a disability that they have to live their body, that it's perfect just the way it is, that they can do whatever they want and play with whatever toys they want because those things aren't necessarily true. Please don't tell me that my body is perfect as it is or that I should love it. If it was perfect I wouldn't be in constant pain. I wouldn't be facing multiple surgeries. I wouldn't have to take medication that makes me ill. Don't tell me that I can do whatever I want when. I've had to change jobs, when I have to work reduced hours and then have to come home and go to bed because working has made me so unwell, when I can't go on holiday or have a social life or do the exercise that I want to do or cook or clean the house.
The message that you are saying the book is giving is aimed at able bodied children and to me is ignoring the challenges that children with disabilities face because its real aim is to challenge views about trans issues but has thrown in skin colour and disability as a smoke screen. Obviously I haven't read the book so am only going on what has been posted here.