Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Good luck Harry The Owl

988 replies

BoreOfWhabylon · 20/11/2019 08:45

Court case today.

twitter.com/WeAreFairCop

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
chilling19 · 20/11/2019 16:18

10.30 am resumes. Well done Fair Cop. That was a roller coaster. 👏👏👏👏

StoatofDisarray · 20/11/2019 16:17

I'm wearing a grey wool scarf and flares!

titchy · 20/11/2019 16:16

It's toddler politics.

Careful - that's age-hate Grin

OvaHere · 20/11/2019 16:15

Phew caught up now.

This judge sounds on the ball. Fascinating stuff. Between this and Maya's case it's been quite the illuminating week.

Well done to everyone at FC.

chilling19 · 20/11/2019 16:15

Using Stephen Lawrence - yes, it is horrendous.

Michelleoftheresistance · 20/11/2019 16:14

And why is this non crime data considered of such importance that people are actually being contacted and criminalised for it? What crime are they so frantically trying to prevent?

Please. Someone explain. Because I think PC Gul innocently gave the game away and it really is thought crime.

MrsSnippyPants · 20/11/2019 16:14

I’m wearing a red top Stoat do say hi!

Whatisthisfuckery · 20/11/2019 16:14

I’m making a report whenever anybody equates being blind with being stupid, or thoughtless, or ignorant. As a blind person I feel that this reflects on me in a negative way and it really offends me. There’s a whole back catalog of recording artists I need to report for a start.

tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 20/11/2019 16:13

Destinys yes! For some reason I'm wondering what he had for his meal deal lunch. "What lunch do Beardy idiots choose?".

IfNot · 20/11/2019 16:12

There is something shameful in using Stephen Lawrence as a human shield isn't there?
YES. Utterly disgusting.

Michelleoftheresistance · 20/11/2019 16:12

'You have evidence to link non crime data to suppression of crime'

What crime? Exactly? Why is the suppression of that one area of crime considered of such importance?

Because tax payers want to know, why are the police wasting time on collating and using non crime data, not about burglary, or rape, or murder, or car theft, but about .... what crime exactly that they feel they have to deter? When there are woefully insufficient resources dealing with actual, evidenced, serious crime with very significant statistics.

StoatofDisarray · 20/11/2019 16:12

Nowhere to sit so I'll lurk outside.

CaptainKirksSpikeyGhost · 20/11/2019 16:10

I think The Counsel for the Defense is 2BoysandaCairn.

It's an identical circular argument.

Michelleoftheresistance · 20/11/2019 16:09

It's toddler politics. Mum she looked at me!

Lysistrataknowsherstuff · 20/11/2019 16:08

I'm making a police report every time someone uses the phrase "had a fit" or "throw a fit". It's pretty offensive to us epileptics if you think too hard about it.

AlunWynsKnee · 20/11/2019 16:08

Those were exactly what I was thinking of SpartacusAutisticus. Plus all the 'Is he autistic?' posts on various 'My dp is a selfish, controlling arse' threads.

MrsSnippyPants · 20/11/2019 16:07

Court 5 Stoat for the next ten long minutes

AutumnCrow · 20/11/2019 16:07

Stoat, up the stairs on the right, apparently.

CaptainKirksSpikeyGhost · 20/11/2019 16:06

WELL DONE TO THE FAIR COP TEAM!

Destinysdaughter · 20/11/2019 16:06

Ha the body language of beardy bloke in that pic is the definitive pictorial representation of mansplaining!!!Grin

BovaryX · 20/11/2019 16:05

At some point, surely, a working definition of 'hate' is going to have to be established? It's mindblowing that this has got into law without being clearly enough established

This lack of clarity, this ambiguity, must be intentional. The lack of definition is deliberate. Its aim is to impose silence. We are living in a climate where being offended is rendering freedom of speech obsolete. People are frightened to state objective biological reality because they are not sure what the penalty will be. I guess the outcome of both these cases will confirm whether that fear is paranoia or justified.

RedDogsBeg · 20/11/2019 16:05

Judge: So if I ring up and say I am a victim the inquiry stops there.
Defence: I am not sure the Police probably want to understand.
Judge: but Pc Gul had already recorded it before making enquiries

Ouch.

ProfessorSlocombe · 20/11/2019 16:05

I'm gonna start making a police report every time someone says they don't think autism exists cos they are obviously denying my existence and want me dead.

Think logically. You can't die if you don't exist.

chilling19 · 20/11/2019 16:05

Grandma welcome to the vortex! Take some time to read the various threads - there are some brilliant women on the FWR board who have thought long and deeply and employed their excellent critical thinking skills to this issue. We always welcome questions put forward in good faith.

StoatofDisarray · 20/11/2019 16:05

There's no one here at the Royal Courts of Justice - have I missed it all?