Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Frack's reference post

569 replies

FrackOff · 07/11/2019 21:30

Hi All
I have been asked in various threads for references. I am starting a new thread as I've lost track of all the conversations. I wasn't going to bother as people usually don't want to read them but since one or two have said they really do want to read them with an open mind, here are a few.

Reidar Schei Jessen & Katrina Roen (2019) Balancing in the margins
of gender: exploring psychologists’ meaning-making in their work with gender non- conforming youth seeking puberty suppression, Psychology & Sexuality, 10:2, 119-131, DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2019.1568290

ABSTRACT
The past 15 years have seen the growth of puberty suppression as the prevailing approach to supporting gender non-conforming children and youth. Puberty suppression is considered to provide time for weighing up the pros and cons of medical transition. Research based on binary under- standings of gender has demonstrated that a carefully selected group of gender non-conforming youth benefit from physical treatment and gender transition, but the research that details how psychologists can best support young people during this time is limited. This is the gap addressed by the current research. The purpose of the present study is to explore the meaning-making framework within which some clinical psychologists and gender non-conforming youth approach discussions of puberty suppression. Five semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinical psychologists working with gender non-conforming youth. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. The results indicate that there is pressure on gender non- conforming youth, often coming from families, friends and mass media, to buy into heteronormative and binary discourses regarding gender and what constitutes a good life. The results also indicate that the participants deploy affirmative and exploratory therapeutic strategies in their work, in order to enable gender non-conforming youth to make informed decisions regarding puberty suppression. Participants emphasized the importance of therapeutic approaches that explore non-binary gender discourses, alongside the use of puberty suppression and other medical interventions that enable clients to fit more with gender norms. The therapeutic balance between affirmation and exploration may shed light on how both research within the binary tradition and critics of binary assumptions are in danger of oversimplifying the process of gender identity development. This research highlights the importance of understanding the complex negotiation of gender discourses that are in tension with one another.

OP posts:
TheProdigalKittensReturn · 09/11/2019 23:45

Our monitors could keep themselves busy for weeks over on AIBU. It's fucking brutal. Unless of course, it's just pesky feminists talking about women's rights that they want to censor.

Every time someone tries to justify the special rules just to keep feminists in line I point out that it's AIBU that's the real bear pit.

Oncewasblueandyellowtwo · 09/11/2019 23:40

So to get back on Frack, woops sorry I mean track. I asked track about this reference twice and I had no engagement from frack.
The results indicate that there is pressure on gender non- conforming youth, often coming from families, friends and mass media, to buy into heteronormative and binary discourses regarding gender and what constitutes a good life
And later it says:
Participants emphasized the importance of therapeutic approaches that explore non-binary gender discourses, alongside the use of puberty suppression and other medical interventions that enable clients to fit more with gender norms
So because these young people feel pressure to conform to gender norms they should get medical interventions and puperty suppression along side therapeutic approaches so they can conform to gender norms?

wecant · 09/11/2019 23:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Oncewasblueandyellowtwo · 09/11/2019 23:23

MNHQ lease please don't delete this thread

HandsOffMyRights · 09/11/2019 23:08

There could be 101 threads and none of them would give Frack the conclusion they crave.

(Empress I wish I could have been there. Julia speaks so beautifully, even on the most brutal of subject matters).

theflushedzebra · 09/11/2019 23:08

Well dependiing on which argument best supports theirs at any given time Mumsnet is either a hotbed of transphobia which must be shut down, OR just a few nasty women on the FWR board.

It never occurs seems to occur to TRAs that MN is a massive site, and that there is no hive mind.

It also never seems to occur to them that there are intelligent, experienced, knowledgeable women here who visit the FWR board to talk and read about women's rights and children's safeguarding (a concern of both mothers and feminists), and the women here can form a coherent argument.

There is no gaslighting on this thread - Frack clearly doesn't know the meaning of the word.

Personally, I find it amusing when TRAs underestimate the women here so completely. The thought that women's arguments would just crumble in the face of a few linked studies - HA. Think again..

Driechdrizzle · 09/11/2019 23:07

I think Frack believes as her intentions are good, very good in fact, therefore we must be the baddies. There's a certain logic there.

Oncewasblueandyellowtwo · 09/11/2019 23:03

Are yous serious is there a 3rd thread?

TinselAngel · 09/11/2019 22:55

Gaslighting” = “not agreeing with me

Well, whoever suggested a trip to AIBU in order to be to be agreed with, must not know MN very well.

Cascade220 · 09/11/2019 22:51

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Datun · 09/11/2019 22:51

Did frack start a third thread? To slag us off in AIBU??

I don't think I've seen anyone's credibility plummet quite so spectacularly.

GCAcademic · 09/11/2019 22:50

In what way were we gaslighting Frack?

“Gaslighting” = “not agreeing with me”. It’s symptomatic of the loose relationship between words and meaning that TRAs often engineer.

DickKerrLadies · 09/11/2019 22:42

AIBU were not sympathetic unfortunately.

AIBU isn't. Is there still the message at the top of AIBU reminding everyone that it's not a fight club?

Our monitors could keep themselves busy for weeks over on AIBU. It's fucking brutal. Unless of course, it's just pesky feminists talking about women's rights that they want to censor.

Driechdrizzle · 09/11/2019 22:42

If we talk about that thread does this become a TAATAAT

TinselAngel · 09/11/2019 22:41

In what way were we gaslighting Frack?

BeMoreMagdalen · 09/11/2019 22:38

I quite enjoyed 'take a breath', though.

Driechdrizzle · 09/11/2019 22:35

Oh that was funny. I've still got the thread up, and I did read her (very long) first post. Frack has been very hard done by here. Very hard done by.

AIBU were not sympathetic unfortunately.

BeMoreMagdalen · 09/11/2019 22:35

It didn't go quite as she perhaps hoped, and has now been deleted as a TAAT. It's obviously not good that she finds the reality of what she is promoting deeply upsetting, but she absolutely did not come here to gain any insight at all.

Honestly, if you are 100% convinced transing kids is decent medical care, no question, and you don't have time to back up that belief with evidence, and instead just want to make pronouncements about the people who disagree with you, citing your very busy life as a reason not to show your reasoning, and the fact that the things you are pressing for are too distressing to discuss, then people making up their own minds about your thoroughgoing ethics and concern for young people isn't 'gaslighting' you. Sheesh.

GCAcademic · 09/11/2019 22:33

“Transphobic”

“White Feminism”

“Triggered”

Got any new words that can be thrown out to shut people down and ensure that you don’t have to listen to their arguments? Because those, frankly, are ones we’ve heard hundreds of times before, and they’re not terribly effective these days.

BarbaraStrozzi · 09/11/2019 22:33

As another lovely mum said to me, holding to the truth is a comfort. Maybe that's why I don't have to leave the room.

That and the fact that your love for your child (which comes through in all your posts, Janes, makes you brave because you have to be. You come across has having ovaries of steel, and I admire you. It would be easier for you to leave the room, but you know you can't, not if you want to protect your child and others in the same situation.

CaptainKirksSpikeyGhost · 09/11/2019 22:32

I didn't read it but you can guess how it went:

"Why did you do that"
"Taat are not allowed""That was achildish thing to do"
"omg I agree the moms in feminist chat are like sooo anti-trans."
"Dfod"
"Why did you do that"
"Taat are not allowed"

popehilarious · 09/11/2019 22:31

A grave misunderstanding of the concept of 'gaslighting' in that TAAT (I have a copy of what she asserted, btw).

JanesKettle · 09/11/2019 22:31

If I left the room every time I felt a trauma response in regard to this issue, I'd never be in the room.

Which is where people like Frack would like parents like me and other ROGD mums here in FWR. Out of the conversation. Shamed into silence and compliance with a treatment model that is openly homophobic, and which lacks a robust evidence base.

As another lovely mum said to me, holding to the truth is a comfort. Maybe that's why I don't have to leave the room.

BarbaraStrozzi · 09/11/2019 22:29

Shame. I was quite enjoying it. As with so many such threads, I don't think it was going quite the way she'd hoped it would.

LangCleg · 09/11/2019 22:28

Bums. Deleted for the dread offence of TAATism. I missed out.