Woman sets person on fire in US

They need to report clearly so there can't be confusion, i.e.

'the woman suspect photographed in the picture'

the bloody gaslighters

On twitter they say woman set person on fire,but the picture link to the article says 'suspect sets woman on fire then may have gone on arson spree'

How is it permissible to deny the victim's sex in the reporting, yet be sure to accurately name the alleged perpetrator as whatever they prefer to be called?

Sex neutralising crime reports and stats. Denying men are violent. Theres been a few on MN traversing the board's recently causing disruption to some key threads and insults to women.

I'm not sure peak transing people with photos and ludicrously transparent "censorship" is necessarily gender critical. The subtext could easily be: "Look at us self-censoring ourselves in order not to get in trouble with the Powerful Liberals!!!! Help, help, I'm being oppressed!"

The Miami Herald's freely writing about the case (just as lots of other outlets were writing about it: it wasn't suppressed) and pretending it needed fo censor itself is either economic (clickbait) or political.

The left could call this out even while covering its arse politically with the message that this sort of thing endangers ordinary trans people (which it probably does. Encouraging a very-armed population to regard trans people as a threat is pretty damned monstrous).

we bitches sure are violent

It's notable how often the comments with these things are GC now and the lack of trans ideology pile-ons. Have those who used to defend anything at all under the umbrella of trans realised it's a bad idea?
Am I wrong to view this with suspicion and wonder, what next?

The framing of that article is so weird, with the photo of the suspect juxtaposed with the "woman sets fire to person" language. It makes it seem as if the person in the photo must be one who some unseen woman set fire to. If you're unfamiliar with this "debate" that's probably what you'd assume.

Meanwhile in reality the invisible woman is the victim, as it's becoming increasingly clear is usually the case.

Die in a fire in action. I bet the woman he set light to doesn't thing he's a woman.

I can’t help but wonder if a GC feminist wrote this and chose the pic purposely to insta-peak as many Miamians as possible.

Good to see some truthful reporting.
Maybe some states are more restrictive of that than others?

Hmm. NY post manages to completely avoid calling Mia a woman, but repeatedly refers to the victim as a woman:

nypost.com/2019/10/24/suspect-busted-for-lighting-woman-on-fire-in-florida-taco-bell/

Well, every single Twitter comment is calling them out on their lying and crap reporting!

Our Vicky is on the Twitter.

No doubt she will find time to convince everyone on there that this really is a woman and to accept without exception. Sort out the ratio problem too!

#notourcrimes is a hashtag used to highlight these cases.

There is a website transcrimeuk.com/ which documents uk crime committed by transwomen and often reported as women's crime. I think there was some talk about rebranding as 'not our crime' as it was a simpler message that crime should be recorded by sex and seen to be less accusatory about transwomen in general.

This censorship of crime reporting seems like a bit of an own goal for the TRAs. Streisand effect type thing.

Looks like some "that never happens" cases get more publicity than they would get otherwise because people read the articles, go "wtf that's not a woman" and respond to it. I suspect newspapers have figured out that it's a great way to get clicks.

End result: people are more aware both that there are a lot of extremely violent transwomen out there, and that the trans movement is censoring newspapers. Or am I being optimistic?

So the woman with the beard and penis set fire to another woman?

As it is mostly leftwingers pushing this dogma I do wonder how many swing votes Trump and the right pick up from all this lunacy

Loved this reply on the twitter thread:

“Not.A.Woman! If this man had a demon cat Halloween outfit on, would you write "A demon cat sets person on fire in Taco Bell"? What if he "identified as Batman"? FFS.”

FFS indeed.

Well, every single Twitter comment is calling them out on their lying and crap reporting!

He, they.. that.
Is 'That' a suitable pronoun?

That is a man.

Is anyone anywhere keeping track of all these cases? Really need a searchable database of the evidence.

I'm really confused about the sex of this individual

Unadulterated photographs are GC.

What a strange sentence I've just said there.

Aka truth.

Are the reporters trying to make a subtle point? They’re certainly highlighting the absurdities.