Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Waxing developments

82 replies

Ali1cedowntherabbithole · 22/10/2019 17:43

Have their been any? I've just seen this on twitter.

Waxing developments
OP posts:
MrsSnippyPants · 22/10/2019 19:26

'tin foil hat' even. Sigh. Oh for a 5 minute edit window......

Karabair · 22/10/2019 19:25

This is awful:

According to Ms DaSilva, whose evidence I accept, Ms Yaniv told her boss that she should not be working with children. Ms Yaniv then reported to Facebook that Ms DaSilva was not using her legal name to run her account and, as a result, Facebook shut down Ms DaSilva's account. Ms DaSilva testified that Ms Yaniv made repeated attempts to contact her through Facebook, texts and at wrok. She became afraid and reported her behaviour to the police. With a police officer present, she phoned Ms Yaniv and the two had a heated conversation. As a result of her negative encounters with Ms Yaniv, Ms DaSilva closed her business.

Stalker

Whatisthisfuckery · 22/10/2019 19:24

Awaits the predictable narc meltdown.

SonicVersusGynaephobia · 22/10/2019 19:21

Karabair thank you for the link to the judgment.

That is very illuminating. The Member was taking a lot more notice of Yaniv's crazy, illogical, and contradictory testimony than I expected.

MrsSnippyPants · 22/10/2019 19:19

Was just talking to a friend about the reaction from the TRA community. I think it is likely to be silence and hope it goes away. However, I have a bad feeling they might go for distraction in some form.........to prove they are still the most oppressed. Maybe even a physical attack on one of their own to prove how vulnerable they are and this was just one bad apple?
I know it sounds 'foil tin hat' but they have form. I hope I am wrong.

Original poster
Ali1cedowntherabbithole · 22/10/2019 19:19

Thanks for the judgement link Karabair .
Happy to see sanity prevail. Wax her balls indeed.

OP posts:
OneTerrificMouse · 22/10/2019 19:18

She interprets a male body to mean a body with a penis and scrotum

Yeah, me too.

CadburysTastesVileNow · 22/10/2019 19:11

'Improper motives'? But surely that never happens ... ?

Inebriati · 22/10/2019 19:11

Is it costs plus $2,000 Canadian?

Karabair · 22/10/2019 19:10

Yaniv got women to talk to Yaniv about Yaniv's penis and scrotum. We know what sort of person does that.

Karabair · 22/10/2019 19:08

It's making me laugh my head off:

After Ms. Benipal responded that her services were for ladies only, Ms. Yaniv responded, "I am a lady".

Jux · 22/10/2019 19:08

"Her scrotum" is brilliant 😂😂😂

LangCleg · 22/10/2019 19:08

Are we allowed to correctly sex Yaniv on Mumsnet, now that Yaniv's "improper motives" (predation, extortion) have been ruled upon?

I fear the litigious ones retain their teflon.

Womenzwork · 22/10/2019 19:02

That judgment makes my eyes itch. Constant references to 'her scrotum', but I agree, it makes the point quite succinctly.

Can JY appeal?

Karabair · 22/10/2019 19:00

I do not accept that a person's decision to touch a stranger's vulva then requires them to also touch a stranger's penis and scrotum

teawamutu · 22/10/2019 18:58

Thank the goddess.

And all the people who came together to support those women, bring sunlight and ensure justice was done.

Breath now bated to see (a) if there's a wider precedent set and (b) what M Ogre makes of it. Also Justin T, you taking note?

Karabair · 22/10/2019 18:56

Yaniv refused to confirm whether or not Yaniv had a penis and scrotum, The defense counsel asked that Yaniv submit to a medical examination but the judge refused to allow it, calling it "disproportionate' aka getting to the truth of the matter.

MrsSnippyPants · 22/10/2019 18:54

"A grocer is not required to service a bicycle" !

Bienchen · 22/10/2019 18:53

Loved this phrase from “A grocer is not required to service a bicycle”.

NonnyMouse1337 · 22/10/2019 18:53

Thank fuck!! Those poor women. $2000 each isn't enough in my opinion, but this is quite a significant ruling. I sincerely hope it sets a precedence. So glad improper motive was found.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 22/10/2019 18:48

Phew.
Throughout the case I felt like even though the right judgement was obvious, there was no guarantee.

StrangeLookingParasite · 22/10/2019 18:47

The judgement doesn't hold back:

Ms. Yaniv has engaged in a pattern of filing human rights complaints which target small businesses for personal financial gain and/or to punish certain ethnic groups which she perceives as hostile to the rights of LGBTQ+ people.

Awaywiththepiskies · 22/10/2019 18:46

Yaniv has lost, and has to pay compensation!

Result!!!! Wine Wine Wine WineWine WineWine Wine

SonicVersusGynaephobia · 22/10/2019 18:45

So there are some sensible people in Canada!

Actually, the judge (or Member) is a rabid transactivist. This must just have been a step too far, ever for her.

SarahTancredi · 22/10/2019 18:45

Brilliant news. I was so scared they would win!
I dont know if the victims are reading this but if they are, I am.so sorry you have been put through this crap.Flowers

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

Join Mumsnet Log In

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.