Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

does everybody hate the term womxn? Or is it just me?

129 replies

Gone2far · 19/10/2019 09:04

The Guardian usually provides me with a shot of instant rage, and, reliable as ever, the front page of the review (my dh's) had the words 'what a time to be a black, british, womxn writer'.
Does anyone else feel , like, a big 'fuck off' when they read that?

OP posts:
TottieandMarchpane · 19/10/2019 13:19

The French have the right idea on women’s titles.

CampingItUp · 19/10/2019 13:14

Ms was just as stupid. The solution was to call all women either Miss or Mrs irrespective of marital status, not invent another non-word

An agreement on one female title would have been good but MN threads demonstrate that many many women like the differentiation... so as I was adamant I would not adopt a title according to marital status from when I was 14 onwards.

Now my Dc have numerous teachers addressed as Ms and they do not find it ‘stupid’ or gave any difficulty with pronunciation.

CampingItUp · 19/10/2019 13:07

Karabair Et al here’s one thebritishblacklist.co.uk/black-womxn-in-theatre-wearevisible-photoshoot/

SlipYarnPurlwise · 19/10/2019 12:51

Seems to me like they're inventing a new word they say is inclusive so that when the rest of use the word woman they can call us out as being not inclusive thereby making them the most virtuous and progressive.

Mind you if they're using it to include transwomen then maybe we can have the word woman back to describe actual women.
(In my head I pronounce it womunx!)

TheChampagneGalop · 19/10/2019 12:23

According to Wikipedia it has only been used since 2015.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Womxn
I searched for mxn there too but the result was "Mexican peso"

GetbusywiththeFizzee · 19/10/2019 11:34

Karabir, I can understand the reasoning behind womanist.
In my experience feminism does exclude ethnic minority women and Islamic women- I see cultural norms playing a large part in this; we aren’t freely accepted in western society even when we conform, it’s not wholly a feminist issue.

writer112 · 19/10/2019 11:27

sorry, posted too early!
It includes the word ‘womxn’

aliasundercover · 19/10/2019 11:27

How about 'womxxn' and 'womxyn'?

The Guardian really has lost it. They despise their own readers so much that they've turned off comments on nearly all articles. The paper knows its readers do not agree with its stance on so many things.

Apollo440 · 19/10/2019 11:26

This entire nonsense about feminism excludes black women is made up TRA bollocks in an attempt to equate genuine black oppression with claimed trans oppression. It is beyond ridiculous.

writer112 · 19/10/2019 11:25

I haven’t read the Guardian article but it surely must be referring to Bernadine Evaristo, who has just jointly won the Booker prize.
Her book, Girl, Woman, Other tells the story of about 15 different black women living in Britain and it’s great. I loved it because it’s entertaining, the characters are brilliant and I learned a lot from it.
At the beginning of her book she has a dedication which I can’t quite remember but it’s something like ‘to all the women and the wimmin

Karabair · 19/10/2019 11:22

Black women have used the term "womanist" rather than "feminist" as they have seen feminism excluding black women and centering white women's interests.

Maybe that's what Camping is thinking about.

Karabair · 19/10/2019 11:20

The students at Goldsmiths College use "womxn". They hate women.

GetbusywiththeFizzee · 19/10/2019 11:15

Camping, I’ve not come cross any black women’s groups who have felt so excluded by white women that they would deny their own biology and team up with white men who believe they are white women.
Can you point me in the right direction - and while you’re at it, let me know where the land of make believe is too.

AnyOldPrion · 19/10/2019 11:12

Karabair beat me to it, but I also would like to see some links, Camping.

You are suggesting this is a term used mainly by groups of women of colour. Are these groups aware that their inclusive term is being co-opted by transactivists to imply that males who transition are just as much women as women of colour?

How would they feel about that, I wonder.

Karabair · 19/10/2019 11:11

The x is definitely symbolic. It's deliberately unpronouncable too, replacing a vowel with a consonant.

Ahundredpercentthatbitch · 19/10/2019 11:03

I hate it. It’s like ’woman’ but literally crossed out.

Karabair · 19/10/2019 11:01

Ms is rather a good term, as it's a public statement that you're likely a feminist. I use it.

Karabair · 19/10/2019 11:00

Which black women's groups Camping? Could you name a few?

Including males in the category "woman" is definitely something women need to resist, and it's not "huffing and puffing" as you put it.

Woman isn't just a term of the women's movement, it's a word used by the whole of the human race in every single language and it means the same in each. Every one of us came from a woman, the female kind, which is the only kind of course.

HorseWithNoFucksToGive · 19/10/2019 10:58

Do they have "mxn" as well or is it the usual one-way street?

ArnoldWhatshisknickers · 19/10/2019 10:56

I can see the argument for it if one were talking collectively about women and transwomen.

I cannot think of any situation where I would be talking of women and XY trans people. Women including XX trans people sure, but the word women already includes all women. Any situation relevant to both women and XY trans people would also be relevant to all other men and we already have a word for women and men collectively, people.

Yet again the woke stasi have come up with a completely unnecessary term that is based on racism and misogyny and serves absolutely no useful purpose.

Of course the Graun love it.

Floisme · 19/10/2019 10:55

Ms was just as stupid. The solution was to call all women either Miss or Mrs irrespective of marital status, not invent another non-word.

CampingItUp · 19/10/2019 10:51

If in a particular circumstance women choose to include Trans women, that is up to them. If they choose to differentiate that from a group of ‘women’ by using ‘womxn ‘ isn’t that also up to them?

I see this word used by lots of black Women’s groups where women feel that intersectionality is more important to them because they have not always felt fully included by a largely white feminist movement.

Just pronounce it women.

We don’t need to huff and puff like people did when Ms was introduced and declared unpronounceable, made up, not real etc.

GetbusywiththeFizzee · 19/10/2019 10:41

I notice Shittypedia have prioritised transgender women in their definition of this nonsensical string of letters.
So not only are we not women, we are then being placed third and below the XY variety.

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 19/10/2019 10:41

Thing is, I have no idea if I've ever met anyone who uses it in real life because I still have no idea how they'd pronounce it. Maybe someone tried to say it and I just thought they were drunk and slurring a bit.

testing987654321 · 19/10/2019 10:37

to explicitly include transgender women and women of color.
These are the people it is regularly used by. Those who were confused about women of colour's sex, and those who are deal with transwomen and women as a single group.

So not most people or most feminists.

Swipe left for the next trending thread