Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Famous men and surrogacy

660 replies

Annasgirl · 04/10/2019 10:43

OK, so this is not to bash the specific person involved but last night I was heading to bed and a story came up on my phone - a person from Westlife was announcing the birth of their baby - through surrogacy (he is gay) and showed a pic of him, his boyfriend and the baby - there was no mother.

So, I totally lost it and poor DH had to listen to me rant for about an hour - but when, oh God, when, are we going to stand up and be counted and take back the rights of women and children?????

DH mentioned that there will always be women poor enough to agree to do this and I countered that you cannot sell a kidney (legally) or buy one so why should you be able to buy or sell a baby???????

BTW, DH agrees with me, but why do I feel I am the only person alive who is angry about this?

And I live in Wokesville (AKA Ireland) and I am worried that we are so keen to be woke and the most liberal place to be gay in the world, that we will soon legalise surrogacy or at least make it easy for people to legally buy a baby overseas and then take it home here. That is what the person was arguing for on his gushing post.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Fieldofgreycorn · 09/10/2019 12:07

I’m not arguing against adoption or surrogacy btw just describing the evidence for optimal development. We know good enough is ok...

Ahh well Field I don't actually think breastfeeding is all that important. Feeding yes, of course, but breast or bottle is basically equal in a developed country with clean water.

No this is blatantly incorrect. And dangerous. For you to have written that basically discredits everything you’ve written as unreliable to my mind.

You have reframed Bowlby to erase the importance of breastfeeding. Bonding starts before birth and is widely encouraged (Solihull approach, unicef bfi etc).

The evidence is clear that human babies require human milk for optimal development.

Choosing not to bf increases the risk of poorer health outcomes for babies and mothers. That may be difficult for some to hear but it is factually correct evidence-based information.

You can improve af with eye contact, skin to skin, responsive feeding etc. But the benefits to the immune system and cognitive development etc. cannot be simulated with formula. Eg the way the fat content of breastmilk changes throughout a feed develops a babies ability to regulate its satiety. Paced feed is an improvement but not the same.

Human baby digestive system expects human milk as the biological norm, it does not cope as well with cows milk, it takes longer to digest and builds growth quicker than breastmilk. Because it was designed to turn calfs into adult cows. It’s not just about volume.

Breastmilk is a living fluid, nothing like processed cows’ milk. It populates the gut biome which together with the immune benefits confers life long health benefits. It is far more than just about clean water supply.

I won’t insult women here by posting links to evidence as this is well publicised and freely available.

RufusthebewiIderedreindeer · 09/10/2019 12:04

Bye mumsnet

I think ploppers should be deleted

Being fucking rude should be against guidelines

IcedPurple · 09/10/2019 12:00

Could be an American site - after all abortion hasn't really been a controversial topic in the UK (other than in NI) for quite a long time now. However, the links are British and I've not noticed any US spellings, which I normally do as they irrationally annoy me!

womanaf · 09/10/2019 11:55

Bye Mumsnet

Uh, buh bye. Grin

For anyone who gives a shit, I’m totally infertile and absolutely, completely and totally opposed to surrogacy.

Still interested to know at what age it stops being acceptable to give away a baby though. A day? Week? Month? Year? They’ll just form a bond with their new primary care-giver, right?

BarbaraStrozzi · 09/10/2019 11:55

Clearly some pro-surrogacy group has been alerted to this thread. And they think it's not blindingly obvious?

I fear you're right Iced.

Pro tip for our new visitors. Try to make your post short and to the point.

Rather than a wall of text which goes "straw man, straw man, straw man, wah you're all meanies, goodbye."

(I also wonder whether the site is an American one, given that there seems to be a recurring theme developing of "spurious analogy with abortion, utterly unconvincing claim to be pro choice, sequence of anti abortion lines (rather giving the lie to the claim of being pro choice), then move to conclusion of 'see, you're not just meanies, you're hypocritical meanies.'"

OhHolyJesus · 09/10/2019 11:53

Bye Yallhy - have been too busy to reply and since you've gone I won't bother.

I do think women have body autonomy and can make their own decisions, but not ALL women sadly.

Babies? Babies can't really tell us what they think, at lest not with words. What does a cry sound like when they want to say "where's my mum, where has she gone, I miss her, why did she give me away?".

Does it sound different to a "I'm hungry" cry?

IcedPurple · 09/10/2019 11:44

Bye mumsnet.

Bye to you too. Nice knowing you from your one and only post on MN.

Clearly some pro-surrogacy group has been alerted to this thread. And they think it's not blindingly obvious?

IcedPurple · 09/10/2019 11:39

Also... we're told that in commercial surrogacy (ugh) is illegal in GB, at least for now.

However, even if on paper the surrogate only gets her 'expenses' what's to stop a wealthy couple slipping her £10K (or even more) off the record? Like I said, I find it very very hard to believe that women undergo pregnancy and childbirth as a pure act of 'kindness' to complete strangers.

Yallhypocrites · 09/10/2019 11:38

"Abortion saves a woman from becoming a mother when she doesn't want to be. It can save her from poverty, from developing in her own life, education, career, or protect her from a difficult pregnancy and impacts on her existing family. It also prevents a child from being born so that person doesn't need to grow up as an unwanted child.

Surrogacy brings a life into the word, a wanted child, but for it to be removed from the one source of food, comfort, love and life it knows. It denies the baby what it knows and could also lead to a life of gaslighting where he/she doesn't know his or her biological origins. (There's a bit in the consultation where a person born of a surrogate can find out on a register if he or she is related to their partner!) "

Very poor arguments to be honest.

Pregnancy and having a baby doesn't stop you having an education or career. Stop telling women they have to abort their baby to have an education or career. I do not believe it still happens in the UK but if any employer still this day and age is refusing to hire/promote or an employer is firing a woman because they are or could become pregnant stop going along with this shit. Fight against it. That's not choice. No-one should be forced into an abortion for these reasons. Or because of poverty actually - that's economic coercion and a form of eugenics. Anyone having abortion for these reasons doesn't really want an abortion, their circumstances FORCE them to. That's nothing to be glad about. That's not "pro-choice" . Also, you know if she doesn't want to become a mother she can prevent it, and, an unwanted baby can grow up in a family who does want them and loves them immensely, it's called adoption. And regardless of what you reply, saying how terrible it is to be adopted, no dear, not buying it. I would rather be alive and adopted than dead. There are soooo many happyily adopted kids, and many people waiting wanting to adopt babies so also don't act like baby will be languishing waiting to be adopted. False. Stop trying to act like a child cannot have a happy life being raised by someone who didn't birth it, whether by adoption or surrogacy, that is a complete lie.

"and could also lead to a life of gaslighting where he/she doesn't know his or her biological origins. "

  • so surrogacy shouldn't happen because some people may pick on the kid? the problem there is not the kid or their family or the surrogate, it's the one picking on them. You don't live your life based on if someone will pick on you or not.

U said this about surrogacy but it sounds like abortion, but with abortion you also kill it:
"removed from the one source of food, comfort, love and life it knows." "It denies the baby what it knows "

Don't pretend to care about babies and their comfort , food source and love, and "what it knows" implying an attachment formed with its mother during pregnancy if you support it being ripped, dismembered, and vacuumed out of the womb at any point during pregnancy. That's hypocritical.

"Body autonomy is essential for women to be in control. Making truly autonomous decisions about your body when you are vulnerable, or being persuaded or paid becomes difficult and sometimes impossible."

  • stop acting like women can't make their own decisions about surrogacy . Assuming they are all vulnerable, being persuaded or doing it for money. How do you know a woman can make a "truly autonomous decision" to have an abortion?? With all the pressures and circumstances that can lead a woman to have an abortion, including the ones you listed, these abortions are NOT truly autonomous decisions.

No-one should support hypocrites, who pretend to care for the baby, claim it develops such a bond with the mother during pregnancy, talk about what it can hear from 18 weeks onwards , mothers heartbeat that calms it after birth , and recognising its mother's voice at around 24 weeks. But if the mother wants to kill it you think that's great, and the baby doesn't matter anymore, but if a mother wants to be a surrogate and give the baby to a loving family, you hate that. You claim it's selfish for the intended parents to want a baby , that it's selfish for the surrogate mother to give the baby to them, you plead "won't someone please think of the baby, and the bond it has created through pregnancy, it's so attached to the mother" , but if a mother decides she doesn't want the baby, she wants to kill it and dismember it with an abortion, you cheer for that, suddenly the baby doesn't matter one bit, somehow we don't need to think of the baby, it can't hear anything then, her heartbeat, her voice, the vacuum ripping it out of the womb, somehow apparently the mother isn't selfish for not considering the baby and killing her baby just because she wants to. The baby doesn't matter anymore. It's not even a human to you anymore. it's not even a fetus to you , it's "a clump of cells", until birth apparently. Magic. Go back to class. The separate human being in the womb apparently doesn't exist now. It's just part of her body like a kidney or other organ not a separate living unique entity inside her attached by a cord. Pretend it has no heartbeat or brain activity, pretend it isn t moving,.blinking and even sucking it's thumb, yeh it's true. Pretend spina bifida surgery can't be performed on it. let's pretend premature babies born when they are still at the age they can still be aborted don't survive. Pretend babies haven't survived abortion either. It's nothing, just "a clump of cells" , "her body". You know its not,.and that "her body her choice" can't apply when there's another body in there, unless you're happy and openly being a murderer. You know its legal murder, especially when the fetus is developing past 8 weeks but you have to rationalise this to yourself. As time goes on and medical advances, knowledge and imaging improves abortion will be seen as less and less acceptable. You're still in the dark ages. Strangely (unless.something goes wrong) the woman doesn't die when you kill the baby. But keep telling yourselves all that stuff if it makes you feel better. Lots of murderers in history have to dehumanise their victims first. The same baby only matters based on the thought in the mothers head. Wanted or not wanted. Same baby. If not wanted , die. You want us to believe that it's only human and only a baby the minute it pops out the vagina or c-section, before this it was nothing. Yaaaaah. Right. You still believe babies come from the stork? Ahh what's happening , does the clumps of cells magically turn into this at contact with the air? mobile.twitter.com/MEDlCALVIDOEOS/status/1096279143661088768

Just be honest, if a woman wants to kill her baby, you think she should be able to because it's inside her. At least this pro-abortion activist is honest mobile.twitter.com/VersoBooks/status/1136981132396957696 See also, www.thetimes.co.uk/article/yes-abortion-is-killing-but-its-the-lesser-evil-f7v2k2ngvf8

Strangely you are mad that someone is bringing a wanted baby into the world. Are you all just mad that these gay men love and want a baby that you would support being killed? I'd rather a baby be alive with loving parents than killed before it even got the chance to be born. Don't come and attack gay men and transgender people who actually want to love a baby that you wouldn't care about in an instant. act ing like these women are being pressured and used by the gays and transgender.

"They belong to your body, they feel safe with your body."
"They belong to their birth mother is all they know, instinctively, and is it proven time and again to be the safest place."
But if you want to kill them and rip them out, dismember, crush their skulls it's ok

Stop acting like a child cannot thrive if it isn't with its birth mother. That's total crap. Stop acting like a woman can't make a decision to be a surrogate, without some evil forcing her. Stfu. Patronising..homophobic, transphobic, hypocritical bigots.

Bye mumsnet.

IcedPurple · 09/10/2019 11:35

It will be women who have signed up to an agency who want to do it. Maybe because they enjoy being pregnant, maybe they want to give the joy of parenthood to someone else,

I find this bizarre.

I've never been pregnant, but if what I've heard is correct, very very few women find pregnancy and childbirth to be an entirely positive experience that they 'enjoy'. And I'd imagine this 'enjoyment' would be different if it was a baby you very much wanted rather than one you intended to give away and perhaps never see again after enduring the 'enjoyable' experience of pushing it out of your body.

Also, the fact is that very few people are prepared to put themselves out for complete strangers. Yet here you're saying that women sign up to an agency in order to inflict pregnancy and childbirth on themselves, purely to give the 'joy of parenthood' to strangers? Not having children isn't a life or even a health threatening thing, so it's hard to believe that women are queueing up to carry and birth children for complete strangers, purely from altruism.

RufusthebewiIderedreindeer · 09/10/2019 11:04

Not interested in totally unrelated, thread derailing, overly-entitled demands on posters time and energy

Yeah

No please nor nothin’

TruthOnTrial · 09/10/2019 10:53

mytinyfiredancer. That is so true. Thats exactly how it worked for me too. They belong to your body, they feel safe with your body. I dont think babies should even be taken for a moment into another's arms and caused deliberate distress without good medical reason for intervention.

Its taken a long time to return to a state where babies are laid straight onto their mother to take their first breaths, peacefully, without alarm as the cord closes naturally. They belong to their birth mother is all they know, instinctively, and is it proven time and again to be the safest place.

BernardBlacksWineIceLolly · 09/10/2019 10:52

Using a scenario in which the arrangement was not done in the legal manor does not prove your point

what happened was not illegal. No-one from that sorry tale is in prison or has a conviction now The commissioners used a contract which is not enforceable in the UK, but that's not illegal. The commissioners to all intents and purposes paid for a baby, and if you squint a bit and make some claims about what the money is for, that's not illegal

so it does prove my point. Unless surrogacy becomes illegal, that will happen again, and again and again

anyone who can read that judgement and not come away with serious questions about surrogacy needs to take a good long look in the mirror

TruthOnTrial · 09/10/2019 10:45

Agreed Barbara

Not interested in totally unrelated, thread derailing, overly-entitled demands on posters time and energy.

Tyrotoxicity · 09/10/2019 10:45

Alright someone give me a legitimate argument for how abortion and other forms of allowable murder are any different?

One could only honestly attempt an answer to this question if one accepted the premise that abortion is "allowable murder."

Don't think you'll find many proponents of that position around here.

mytinyfiredancers · 09/10/2019 10:42

When my DD was born by ELCS, she was lifted out and immediately wailed her little lungs out, like most babies do when they're born. She was taken from me for about two minutes to be wiped, weighed and have her vit k injection and those two minutes felt like a lifetime as she cried.

I'd undressed before surgery to accommodate skin to skin assuming all went well. The second, the literal second, DD was placed on my chest with her head on my heart she silenced. She stayed there, snug and calm for the whole 45 minutes it took to stitch me up. When I handed her over to DH for them to wheel me into recovery she yelled again until she was out back in what she evidently knew was her rightful position, on me.

To deliberately take that experience away from a baby minutes out of the womb is barbaric. And I say that as a mother whose first birth did not go according to plan at all meaning first DD got no immediate skin to skin and was wrapped and cuddled
by her Dad whilst I had urgent surgery. Sometimes these things can't be helped, but the intent makes all the difference. A child who is ripped away from its mother permanently at birth is bound to have effects in later life. Adopted children often suffer with attachment issues regardless of how amazing and loving their adoptive parents are.

I was all for surrogacy (as an act of kindness not for profit) until I had my own children.

BarbaraStrozzi · 09/10/2019 10:31

Alright someone give me a legitimate argument for how abortion and other forms of allowable murder are any different?

I think, oh brand new to Mumsnet poster, that you have just outed yourself as a goady fucker - I for one do not believe you are posting in good faith and will not be engaging with you any further. I suggest anyone else with similar suspicions does likewise.

Taxtaxtax · 09/10/2019 10:29

*isnt

NotTonightJosepheen · 09/10/2019 10:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Taxtaxtax · 09/10/2019 10:27

You’ve just linked to a court judgement in which the parents found the mother via Facebook and entered into an unregulated surrogacy agreement in which they paid her £8-£15k.
That is altruistic surrogacy. Agency’s which are legally run, you cannot pay the surrogate. They can claim back medical expenses only.
Using a scenario in which the arrangement was not done in the legal manor does not prove your point.

There will always be people willing to break the law to get what they want. You can’t change that.

NotTonightJosepheen · 09/10/2019 10:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BernardBlacksWineIceLolly · 09/10/2019 10:25

Start another thread Fox

We’re talking about something else here

fox61524 · 09/10/2019 10:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BernardBlacksWineIceLolly · 09/10/2019 10:22

also, if someone could provide guidelines to at which it becomes not OK to buy a person that would be super. so

in utero -fine to buy - kerching!
Under 1 - go ahead and purchase
up to 10?
Over 18?

TruthOnTrial · 09/10/2019 10:21

Taxtaxtax

Those are hardly valid reasons for supporting baby trading and harm to newborn infants are they.

Fox
What do you mean what do I mean? God so many!

What a lot of nonsense arguments for hurting babies deliberately.

Ooooo, we neeeeed a baby/can't have one, is no excuse for deliberately bringing harm to babies.

Its a horrible, devastating reality to not have children when they are so wanted, but its not an excuse for using women as baby trading vessels, or deliberately bringing harm to an infant. What a start, and what a life to have to live.

Theres no way murdering adults is comparable to abortion Shock Hmm. Of course. No way.