Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Famous men and surrogacy

660 replies

Annasgirl · 04/10/2019 10:43

OK, so this is not to bash the specific person involved but last night I was heading to bed and a story came up on my phone - a person from Westlife was announcing the birth of their baby - through surrogacy (he is gay) and showed a pic of him, his boyfriend and the baby - there was no mother.

So, I totally lost it and poor DH had to listen to me rant for about an hour - but when, oh God, when, are we going to stand up and be counted and take back the rights of women and children?????

DH mentioned that there will always be women poor enough to agree to do this and I countered that you cannot sell a kidney (legally) or buy one so why should you be able to buy or sell a baby???????

BTW, DH agrees with me, but why do I feel I am the only person alive who is angry about this?

And I live in Wokesville (AKA Ireland) and I am worried that we are so keen to be woke and the most liberal place to be gay in the world, that we will soon legalise surrogacy or at least make it easy for people to legally buy a baby overseas and then take it home here. That is what the person was arguing for on his gushing post.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Loopytiles · 04/10/2019 19:18

Buying a baby, literally.

zeeboo · 04/10/2019 19:17

Was the woman who gave birth the child's mother? Or was the egg donor? All this 'concern' for a baby who will probably only ever know total love and adoration from its Daddies. Surrogacy in the developed world is an act of kindness and selflessness. Women aren't doing it because they are being forced, they are giving a gift and most are not giving away their own biological child because an egg donor is used.

NotTonightJosepheen · 04/10/2019 19:16

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Lamahaha · 04/10/2019 19:11

*unwoke

Lamahaha · 04/10/2019 19:11

Where is this photo that everyoe has seen except me???

I think many people, men especially, and even many women, don't or can't comprehend the bond that grows between a mother and her baby during pregnancy. And even if the mother doesn't feel it, the baby certainly does.

...you would probably be taking your life into your hands to disagree with the wokeratie in Ireland. Luckily I live in a very uwoke, rural part of Ireland. The shit hasn't hit us yet. But even when I've been to Dublin, I haven't seen any of it. Single sex loos wherever I've been (mostly the airport!)

Cherylshaw · 04/10/2019 19:06

@yulet
I wasnt comparing the two, I was responding to the posts about how it's terrible for the baby not to get these things from the surrogate, and saying the baby would not suffer from not getting skin to skin or breastmilk etc
as some mother's cannot give them after birth

Hoppinggreen · 04/10/2019 19:03

Unfortunately NotTonight it meant I didn’t really want much to do with her at all for the first 6-12 months (pnd)
She’s 14 now and we are very close fortunately

NotTonightJosepheen · 04/10/2019 18:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BlingLoving · 04/10/2019 18:56

I do worry about the potential abuse in a surrogate situation. But actually, if I was a surrogate I know the only way I could it would be if I gave birth and did not take any maternal involvement whatsoever. I would not want the parents to include me in pictures etc. I would want them to be appreciative of me etc of course.

The biggest issue for me is that by definition surrogacy assumes that pregnancy is inconvenient but low risk. I have had v difficult pregnancies and dangerous births so the idea of surrogacy scares me.

Cherylshaw · 04/10/2019 18:47

@NotTonightJosepheen

I don't know why you are so angry about it, I'm sterelised so can't have any more children, my friend was a surrogate for her sister and received no financial game for doing so and I know or 2 other women who have done so I don't know the ins and outs of how it went about with them so can't really comment.
if my daughter wanted to do it I wouldn't stop her

MissBPotter · 04/10/2019 18:46

Totally agree but you will get accused of homophobia. Personally I believe gay men should be able to adopt but I really don’t like surrogacy. They can’t biologically have children so that’s it. Adoption or child free.
Poor woman.
Also don’t like that they didn’t acknowledge the surrogate at all. At least Kim Kardashian and Kanye did acknowledge her when they announced the birth of their children through surrogacy.

OhHolyJesus · 04/10/2019 18:46

I think it makes it worse Cheryl as then at least two women have sold their biology to creat a baby that will know neither of them.

Currently UK Law recognises the surrogate mother as the mother but the consultation seeks to change that. An egg donor isn't named and can remain anonymous but the child would be half of that person and would know only the mother before birth. That's just the biology of the situation, nothing to do with how good or bad the intended parents would be, straight, bi or gay.

Cherylshaw · 04/10/2019 18:41

surrogate's are not always the mum to the baby, yeh they have carried the baby but they are not there biological mum.
I don't know the details of this story but if the woman carrying the baby is not the mother does that make it different for you?

NotTonightJosepheen · 04/10/2019 18:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Squeakycheese · 04/10/2019 18:39

I saw that photo last night and felt the same as you op Sad I'm completely against surrogacy as I think it's morally wrong to buy and sell human beings and it also exploits poor women. The fact that there was absolutely no mention of the childs mother really upset me and the photo could have been two men buying something from a store from the look of it.

Hoppinggreen · 04/10/2019 18:38

Almost as soon as DD was born I was taken to surgery, I didn’t hold her until she was several hours old, DH dressed her and changed her 1st nappy etc.
Doesn’t really equate to selling my baby

yulet · 04/10/2019 18:36

"I know most of you will disagree with me but a lot of babies don't get skin to skin or straight on the breast, there mum is not there right away for medical reasons".

... so that's the same as a mum permanently abandoning a child for all time at birth?

VictoriaSpongeAndTea · 04/10/2019 18:34

Just as with prostitution I don't know what circumstances led the woman (in this case the mother) to that point so it is those who create a market I have a problem, with whether they are male or female.

And I say this as someone who desperately wanted children and needed medical treatment before I was able to carry a baby to term and feared I might never be able to.

How can Ireland of all countries allow the rich to buy babies again Angry

Cherylshaw · 04/10/2019 18:33

the woman would have hardly been forced into it.
I'm going against the grain here, in that I don't find surrogacy a vile, horrible thing.
the woman was obviously quite happy doing this, the child is wanted and will be loved (presumably).
I think it's a commendable and selfless thing for someone to do. imo
I know most of you will disagree with me but a lot of babies don't get skin to skin or straight on the breast, there mum is not there right away for medical reasons etc and the baby is not scarred for life because of that .

yulet · 04/10/2019 18:21

I don't think the mum is some blameless angel here either.

However personally I am always going to "blame" the people buying more than the one selling - just like I blame the people who buy sex rather than those who sell it.

More than any of them though, I blame the society that says it's all fine and allows this to happen.

SarahTancredi · 04/10/2019 18:07

Yes because employment is renowned for being accessible to poorly educated, ex prisoners, single , fleeing domestic violence having been in an shelter, women.

Bet all those prostitutes/escorts wish they had thought of macdonalds 🙄

Hoppinggreen · 04/10/2019 18:03

I don’t think they are evil, I think they are spoilt and entitled - they have enough money to buy what they want and they want a baby. No thought for the baby or the person attached to the womb that carries it.
I also don’t think too highly of the women who sell their children either

Annasgirl · 04/10/2019 17:57

I acknowledge what the woman did was wrong, but she signed a contract and could probably be sued.

It should just be illegal all over the world, in all circumstances, as we noted, no one has the right to a child.

And as for "the poor gay men - jeez, isn't biology a croc - but that's life. Suck it up.

I don't go on facebook so cannot see the page but you would probably be taking your life into your hands to disagree with the wokeratie in Ireland.

OP posts:
OnlyFoolsnMothers · 04/10/2019 17:44

Well it’s quite probable the woman didn’t comprehend the bond she’d feel for the baby until she gave birth.

Ultimately it’s the baby I feel sorry for- and it’s the men in this story raising a fist to the news they have a baby that disgust me

ShadowOnTheSun · 04/10/2019 17:40

Oh, so 'two evil men using a poor woman as a womb'? Or rather a woman renting her womb out and selling her baby. Presumably, they didn't just catch an innocent bystander and forced her to carry the baby and then stole it away from her. Nope, she sold it: took a handsome sum in exchange for a baby. Just how all of a sudden she's innocent in all this and the men are heartless? If anything, they're just bad as each other, but she's worse. That was her baby and she sold it.

And no need for the 'poor woman did it, so she wouldn't starve'. If you're starving - go work at McD, take up a cleaning job or similar. Plenty of women do this. They don't go about selling babies.