Not having sex with someone because they don't have the right genitals is transphobic. No prizes for guessing who's claiming this

I think we just have to keep explaining to straight men that they’re transphobic if they refuse to suck dick.

ON YOUR KNEES, CIS SCUM!

I think we just have to keep explaining to straight men that they’re transphobic if they refuse to suck dick.

Sorry, guys, but those are the rules. We didn’t make them up.

Maybe some leaflets handed out by, oh, an organisation of women allies, with all the right quotes, explaining the rules, would help get the straight men on board with the gender liberation movement?

Tyro

I opened up that photo in the hopes that it would help.

Now I'm left wondering how often aromantic pansexuals turn up at the GP with an embarrassing rash and have to be given a gentle lecture about which foodstuffs it's appropriate to introduce to one's genitals.

Not convinced it's an improvement, really, but a welcome diversion nonetheless. Thanks Empress.

I’m sharing Sandy Draws Badly’s guide to sexuality because it’s just too good not to.

Hm. I think this might make more sense if we knew how RM defines "sexual attraction."

I'm far from an expert but I was under the impression it's something to do with that whole tingly undercarriage thing being prompted by the presence or actions of someone else, and orientation is defined with reference to the reproductive sex of said someones.

Nope, I'm no closer to reconciling this "asexual lesbian" thing.

But you still want sex, like, as an activity

So that's wanking, then? Is RM confusing asexuality and autosexuality? Or does RM only seek sex with bodies-as-objects and isn't sexually-attracted to bodies-as-subjects?

The only person I've never known who claimed to be asexual was into some really weird porn. I always thought he just needed some serious therapy.

Apparently it means not feeling sexual attraction towards anyone. But you still want sex, like, as an activity having no connection towards being attracted towards the people you're having sex with?

Which honestly just sounds like some sort of emotional problem to me, and not something to celebrate.

I feel like when people first started using that term it meant "doesn't have any real interest in sex, libido pretty much zero" and now like most things words mean whatever anyone feels like at the time.

See, my response to "vegans can love a good steak!" is "Intriguing. What definition of veganism are you using?"

Asexuals can have sex - obviously, yes.

Asexuals can enjoy sex - um, could maybe buy this depending how we're defining asexual, and how we're defining sex.

Asexuals can want sex - back the fuck up there. So "asexual" has nothing to do with lack of sexual wossnames then? So what does it mean? Attracted to neither sex yet wanting to have sex... With whom, precisely? Or what?

The whole "asexuals can have/want/enjoy sex!" thing has always sounded like "vegans can love a good steak!" to me. Perhaps I'm insufficiently woke.

I haven't dared look into what the 'my wife raped me' thing is all about - please tell me it's not some sort of "I'm asexual thus never wanted sex thus every single time was rape by default" thing?

Still not sure how one can be both asexual and sexually attracted to women either. I suspect RM's definition of asexual is, like RM's definition of lesbian, not the same as everyone else's definition. Buggered if I'm trawling for further data on this one though.

I suspect RM means RM came but didn't really mean it.

Identifies as a fake orgasm obvs. "Women" fake em all the time you know

Yeah, but if RM is producing rainbow juice then surely that's not actually faked? Unless there's some sort of mechanical gubbins hooked up to a bottle of something taped to the side of the genitals.

Or is RM saying that 95% of their ejaculations weren't actually orgasms?

Or is it that in 95% of cases RM's female partner had no line-of-sight and no physical contact and so didn't notice that ejaculation wasn't occurring?

Or is it just that RM believes "faking 95% of orgasms = super-feminine" and is bullshitting accordingly?

I don't know why this is bothering me so much.

"How d'you fake ejaculation?"

Maybe it has something to do with fake lesbians and their "girldicks", they probably produce trans semen which identifies as "rainbow juice".

That means that I faked 95%+ of the orgasms. Sex in that role (with those genitals) never felt right

Have we got a head-scratching emoticon yet?

How d'you fake ejaculation? not sure I really want an answer to this

and it's part of the reason the MN 'special rules' for FWR irk me so much

some people just need to have the piss taken out of them

if you don't want people to find you ridiculous, don't act ridiculously

Bicker, I think that's why so many of them get their XY- fronts in a twist on here.

Those narcs definitely had surgery - humour bypasses.

The Harrop sketch really is the gift that keeps on giving, along with "It's ma'am!"

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Bet the MRAs love that one!

Just saw this on FB. It's a public post but I've cropped the author off just in case.

It's a photo of a screen so it's not great quality but hopefully you can zoom in.

I'm more and more seeing that the issue is you can't argue with a narcissist

No, you can’t. But you can ridicule them.

In “Rules for Radicals”, Saul Alinsky argues that ridicule is a very effective weapon against weapon. It’s also VERY effective against narcissism, because narcs can’t okay: they have no sense of humour.

This is why Posey Parker’s so effective and why they loathe her so: she has a fast, sharp wit and she’s not afraid to use ridicule as a weapon.

What she did to Harrop was comedy gold.

Ditto Julie Bindel laughing and telling Jane Fae, “You don’t know you were born.”

Of course, narcs don’t like being ridiculed, and that makes them dangerous.

But maybe it’s time some of us quit assuming logic and intellect wins against power and start playing the Fool instead.

I for one am sorry GoAwayRachel has "changed her mind" as I think her contention is entirely logical. If you have to pretend that trans women are women when they're playing sports, why not when theyre having sex.

So RM says that it's because of Penis that transwomen aren't welcomed in homeless shelters, ladies rooms, etc. Once again leaving out the fact that Penis Ladies are attached to large, dangerous, entitled, aggressive males who can beat the crap out of us. The entire argument about physical intimidation is entirely sidestepped.