"Why is Jessica Y still on Twitterand not in jail?" Meghan Murphy in the Spectator.

www.aldergrovestar.com/news/controversial-langley-transgender-activist-arrested-over-stun-gun/#

Controversial Langley transgender activist arrested over stun gun

A highly publicized Human Rights Tribunal complaint has drawn notority to the local activist

AlwaysComingHome, so the haphazardness of the rules is reflected in the haphazardness of the record keeping? Sounds like an employee with an axe to grind inadequately supervised or promoted above their competence....

The last two times I posted my opinions on Yaniv I got deleted.

I got given a final warning a few weeks back. Something about being warned before (I hadn’t) and that I would be permanently banned if I did whatever I’d done wrong again but no clue what that was apart from the usual link to the Guidelines.

People are right about the eggshells. It’s about keeping the rules vague enough that we are always unsure where the boundaries are. It’s more abusive than strictly defined rules because it’s about fear, not behaviour.

..."and they that wasted us required of us a song..." seems quite apposite, really.

Yes, MN should be ashamed of it's craven stance. I had thought much better of them prior to that.

Unfortunately, it is my main social outlet - irl and online - so I can't leave just yet. Am trying to find another place to go though.

Yaniv’s own mother misgenders the time of day 😂😂

But what I’ve found, to my chagrin, is that no matter what ‘they’ say, if we repeat it we’re fucked wrong.

Do I say, not as I do.

Said every abuser, ever.

Yaniv’s own mother misgenders Yaniv all the time. Yaniv has also been known to misgender and indeed deadname themselves.

Funnily enough BernardBlacksWineIceLolly it’s almost like MN has us walking on eggshells ya know...

This.

Thanks @GirlDownUnder
Have been unfriended twice (that I know of) in the last year and called a bigot 🤔 - by folk I thought knew me better. I only post the odd thing about this issue. The positive is that it's given some friends the courage to agree and speak out too, though equally there are some who can't even like or comment on posts as it puts their jobs at risk.

It's madness ☹️

Hope you don’t get too burned on FB, sometimes you get surprised. MN will be here regardless.

Thanks for posting this link. And to you @TheOnlyLivingBoyInNewCross, for the Orwell quote.

I have posted both on my FB page, just to see how many virtue signallers unfriend me by teatime.

Having been banned from twitter on account of JY (and MO - I posted his ad for IT stalkers to set up his social media spying service to gather evidence to target dissenting women legally) I don’t think I should comment. But this thread is gold.

I'm currently in twitter jail because I stated that if you have a penis and you want tohave des with someone with a vagina you are not a lesbian.

But as Twitter doesn't include 'sex' as a protected characteristic in its policy for enforcement, "the behavior is directed at an individual, group, or protected category of people" but does include gender I have submitted a claim for sex discrimination, I've linked to Meghan's article as an example of Twitter discriminating against women.

The last two times I posted my opinions on Yaniv I got deleted.

Posts/threads will generally only be deleted if reported. MNHQ have enough to do dealing with reports (not just from FWR) without trawling threads looking for wrongthink posts that break guidelines.

If posts referring to Yaniv as 'he' are not being deleted is it safe to assume they are not being reported?

If that is the case, it suggests that at least some of our monitors would like to distance themselves from Yaniv - aka 'not true trans'. But I'm sure that's not true given their dislike of 'gatekeeping'.

Very odd indeed!

Yes it is funny. Those monitors choose to ignore particular threads.
I guess the cognitive dissonance would cause quite the migraine 🤔

I also find it strange that certain monitors, like Mimmymum, never link to threads about Yaniv as examples of Mumsnet “transphobia”.

Yes, it’s a complete mystery Of course it is frustrating to feel forced to use a pronouns if one disagrees with the premise that personal pronouns are a person’s choice. Of course it is equally irritating that Twitter is not fair in its policies on hate speech. When Megan Murphy was banned a tweeter asked why his complaint about a jihadi beheading video had been ignored for over a fortnight.

However, how much more frustrating to be a TRA activist getting caught up knots over the ‘acceptance without exception’ policy. People like JY, our favourite cyclist and Karen White have really helped raise public awareness. I welcome any articles about them using their desired pronouns in the mainstream media simply because it helps counter the one sided perspective from Mermaids, Stonewall etc.

Ha AF, awesome cross post

Re JY pronouns - please ignore my earlier posts, seems I was totally wrong. Sorry for the bum steer

Yaniv is male

certain monitors, like Mimmymum, never link to threads about Yaniv

And certain of our regular posters never comment on JY threads. Although they’re very active on threads to make sure they are just presenting another view and to save us from being an echo chamber.

I echo your

I also find it strange that certain monitors, like Mimmymum, never link to threads about Yaniv as examples of Mumsnet “transphobia”. Funny that .

I thought we were allowed to use male pronouns if there was evidence that someone has clearly acted in a nefarious manner?

Having seen the videos JY sent to Jessica Rumpel, talking about her 'titties' in the Elmo voice, there is no question that JY engaged in sexual conversations with a 14 year old child. JY says her name repeatedly.

JY also says JY didn't want to wait till she was 16 and JY asked her to send him photos of her used tampons and pads. Jessica Rumpel was a lonely teenager with strict parents and a very restricted social life. She felt sorry for JY and used to have regular correspondence with JY (who claimed to want to marry her) until she found out that JY was literally cutting and pasting messages and sending them to plenty of other underage girls.

I'm really hoping that more and more people will come forward with their evidence of JY's behaviour. It is the sort of the behaviour that is generally only linked to one sex.

Why do the monitors think that every time we say he they need to get it deleted?

It is very telling male behaviour to keep shutting women up.

*Imagine being a journalist working on the White story and having to write "her penis".

That about sums up the lunacy, doesn't it? From my media experience (back in the day local paper advertising) stories were checked by sub editors to help avoid "errors", I like to think that some rebellious journalists correctly sex, but I suspect that fear of dramas with woke colleagues prevents them from doing so.

In fairness though, despite the blatant misogyny from the Twitter PTB, I can't help feeling that the photo is a result of JY taking an opportunity. Not the first time JY has tried it. Although since there hasn't been any distancing statement does give me pause.

On the bright side happy to see Meghan Murphy get some media exposure. I was lamenting on another thread how some are jumping on the JY bandwagon while she still remains banned by Twitter.

I too question the decision to still police JY's pronouns here, especially when twitter are letting the he/hims flow.