Prince Andrew Denies Everything (Again...)

Anyone watch The Prince and the Paedophile C4?

Really, really grim.

Article in The Times today called the poor girl he raped Epstein’s ‘friend’.

She is absolutely right. It disgraces us all to have our country represented by this worthless piece of trash. Not only that our taxes go to support him! It’s a constant insult.
Tumbril times - yes, bring it on.

Love Janice Turner and as ever she’s spot on here. I always get a briefing on the weeks article from DH who thinks she’s marvellous. I think I may have cause to be jealous in truth

The Times article is good, thanks for posting it.

A judge in New York has said case closed because Epstein is dead. Civil proceedings are now the only way forward perhaps.

Janice Turner adds her 2 cents:

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/its-time-prince-andrew-faced-the-music-q5rkxhhrt?shareToken=4474cf9da24787d3f90d9f4e004c66c7

What proof is there that there was no coercion? With rich powerful men?

Have to hand it to the Fail, they are continuing to run the story.

I read this earlier (sorry it's the Fail):
www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-7404139/JSP-doubt-Prince-Andrew-face-court-happened-Jeffrey-Epsteins.html
I quite like Janet Street Porter.

What I do not understand about the entire Epstein scandal is how and why young girls/women were forced to perform sex acts with various men. Surely house parties of the type hosted by Epstein, which have always happened unfortunately, are usually 'staffed' by hired women. It's still tacky but at least there's no coercion and the girls are paid a fee. They can leave at any time, they also don't have to go back at a later date if they don't want to.

It's the forcing that gets to me most and, yes, that is definitely rape.

Yeuch.

How is it, that when someone is a member of the Royal Family, a girl is ‘forced to have sex with’, rather than raped? Call a spade a spade and give the victim the respect she deserves.

Not sure about the roaring with laughter bit. Perhaps though. I expect because of his privilege many think he’s untouchable but you don’t know what outs there. Even if he never faces any legal proceedings people will know. Most people believe he’s done bad things already and whilst I usually don’t condemn people before being found guilty he’s a special case in that he never will be. At the very least we know he’s lying. Bill Clinton and Andrew are up to their necks. Not sure about Trump. I don’t think he got involved in that particular scheme but is likely to have been involved in separate ones. He’s too arrogant to low tow to him

all the I never seen anything myself statements mean nothing in terms of continuing to hang around a convicted paedophile / child molester

Well yes, that's true - but claiming "I didn't see anything" is all he's got

He'd probably have tried to say "I was never there" if not for the pictures or "I didn't know about his conviction" except that would be ridiculous, so he's just grasping at whatever he can

And Valerian was quite right; he's probably roaring with laughter behind the scenes, knowing that no matter what, he can buy/influence his way out of it and to hell with the plebs

It's pretty damning. In fact it's completely damning. Either he is so stupid he did not notice he was holidaying in a convicted pedophile's lair or he was aware and was enjoying it.

First conviction sorry

As a Royal the first initial should have been it in terms of never having any interaction ever again (not that I believe he was duped or anything). He just has zero defence seeing him after and all the I never seen anything myself statements mean nothing in terms of continuing to hang around a convicted paedophile / child molester

Do Andrew said that he didn’t notice any immoral criminal behaviour on Epstein’s part and it was just coincidental that they gave him a 17 year old girl to have fun with rape ?

Oh how they must laugh. They really can do what they like.

Just finished reading Jephsons royal book. You really cannot blame the palace machine denying things if their employer states that they are completely innocent. They were put in an impossible position back in the nineties and it looks like a rerun for them except there are more royal backsides that need covering time and time again.

How can Andrew deny any knowledge of epsteins paedophilia when he remained in contact AFTER his release from jail!

He can't - but isn't what he's trying to say that he didn't see any such activity ^while actually with Epstein"? (not that I'd necessarily believe that either)

What really beats me is what they did with Philip while Fergie was at Balmoral. Did they lock him in a barn or something, or has he suspended his previous views in some joint attempt to get his son off the hook?

I predict a funeral.

Wasn't there some suggestion that the Queen's Grandmother died at a very convenient time to allow the appropriate period of mourning before the coronation?

In terms of being judged by the internet there’s a good reason why he’s not garnering a lot of sympathy. If his links to Epstein had been completely severed after his initial conviction he could at least attempt to make plausible denies about knowing what he was really like but he continued to see him AFTER.

How the fuck didn’t the Royal handlers not ban him from meeting him or was he so arrogant he refused to do so? Or conspiracy theory alert he was worried Epstein has stuff on him

I don't think the majority of the public buy Prince Andrew's latest statement at all. The Royal Family are trying to take us all for fools but I don't think it's working. It's the attempted cover up and dodgy statements which will cause the most damage to them.