If you ever wanted proof that TRA is the same MRA check this out.

It's not illegal to catch sight of a child in a changing room!

It's also not illegal to have pics of children in your pc!

There needs to be other components to make these things crimes

Funny how these men are more than happy to keep their sex segregated spaces whilst telling women they aren't allowed them.

Does he not realise that allowing some men in means we would have to allow ALL men in. Including the perverts and predators. Dickhead.

I think on Twitter he is @rhjameson. Seems to be the same person.

I do wonder what would happen if he happened to see a young girl getting changed if allowed in and her mother chose to involve the police.

Would that clarify matters for him? Would he end up on the sex offenders register?
Just a few pictures of under 16 year olds on your laptop can end up in a prosecution and 10 years on the register-how can you prosecute one and not the other- it’s suddenly a bit of a grey area.

Does this prick have a twitter account?

I'm pretty sure that the sexual predator article is satirical. I know it's hard to tell these days but I very much doubt he genuinely espouses that position. And he does use satire in his writing - see this piece, for example:

medium.com/@RJameson/well-done-brunei-your-death-to-gays-policy-is-a-big-step-forward-91cd39c6a7e

I suspect the Primark article is satirical too, though I can't be 100% sure.

Thinking further about this made me so cross.
How dare he say that he knows what it’s like to be a trans woman. Has he had abuse in the street, be stared at, been beaten up, lost friends and jobs? I’m guessing not.

As, I assume, a straight white male he’s top of the pile, he has no idea.

He's equating himself with transwomen.

It's just occurred to me that for all his lack of empathy for women's feelings, he demonstrates empathy for TW - both in the original post and in the comments. He's commiserating with TW because he too has experienced been challenged because he looks like a masculine male. But he can't comprehend women's concerns about their own safety. Because face to face hurty feelz outweighs the statistically small chance of being raped/murdered (I'm referring to his wider comments, not restricted to use of changing rooms), which is what women actually fear.

The misogyny is strong with this one...

Because if TWAW then they should use the women's rooms. As he's a man, not a TW, it shouldn't even occur to him to use the women's. Unless he doesn't really believe TWAW and that if penis-owners are allowed in, in the form of TW, then he, as a fellow penis-owner, should also be allowed in.

Well spotted. He's equating himself with transwomen. Not just a dick, a transphobic dick.

He seems to be acting like he is the only man who has ever had a daughter.
He has a point about lone fathers with daughters and how that can be awkward. If he’d stuck to that he would have had a point but when he starting farting on about ‘assuming his gender’ then he completely lost any point he had.

I think that it’s fair for anyone to assume that a man, dressed as a man, talking and acting like a man and being referred to as dad by his child is a man.

This is also hugely disingenuous of the real problems faced by trans women.
There is no comparison.

Also, why would you buy your daughter clothes that she can’t do up?

What a fanny.

So many issues to unpick:

1. Men's changing rooms: I think he said it was on a different floor; no mention of not wanting to take his daughter there because of her safety (I can't bring myself to read that drivel again to check).

1. Every time someone cried 'But no man would ever go to all the trouble to identify as trans or AGP to access female only spaces', we can link to his blog.

He didn't even identify as trans. This was a non-trans man who wanted to access women's fitting rooms. This illustrates women's concerns about the acceptance of transwomen into women's same sex spaces actually eroding the preservation of same sex spaces, because some non-trans men will try to blag their way in. He's actually scored an own goal - he's provided an example of a non-transgender man wanting to enter a women's same sex space, and using the argument of trans-rights. This should be on the This Never Happens thread.

It also shows the fallacy of the TRA strawman argument that women's feelings of being unsafe in the presence of transwomen are unfounded, because, as we all know, that wasn't our concern. It was that once TWs are allowed in, some non-transgender men will try to get in too. And here we have it.

1. His motivations: transgender rights or MRA? As the OP says, this is blatant MRA - not all men attack women, therefore it's sexist to segregate men and women, and women's concerns of risk and safety are irrelevant.

Interesting that he's conflating this with trans rights. If he really believed in trans rights he wouldn't want to enter a women’s changing room anyway, would he? Because if TWAW then they should use the women's rooms. As he's a man, not a TW, it shouldn't even occur to him to use the women's. Unless he doesn't really believe TWAW and that if penis-owners are allowed in, in the form of TW, then he, as a fellow penis-owner, should also be allowed in.

So his apparent support of trans rights is guff and it really boils down to MRA.

Either way, it's a prime example of how the erosion of sex-based rights in favour of trans-rights can enable non-trans people to override women's concerns for their own safety.

I strongly suspect it’s a spoof a la Titania McGrath

I hope you're right Doggy!

His feelings about this experience trump his daughter's safety in sex segregated areas.

Speaks volumes about male entitlement.

And yes that is bad!! It is not a sexual evolution designed to help the species

Re: the 'sexual predation is ok, actually necessary' article... I once read a book called 'Sperm Wars' which was about the evolution of reproductive behaviours. It claimed that rape was indeed a reproductive strategy adopted by a minority of inadequate loser men who preferred violence to genetic annihilation. But who in their right mind would suggest that makes it ok?! Message to creepy MRA 'philosopher': we are moral, reasoning creature you know - we don't just have to devolve to the most base animal instincts. That's not progress!

I strongly suspect it’s a spoof a la Titania McGrath.

I can’t see how this is real

I would file this under 'everyone is special'. Some people just think they are special and that normal rules don't apply. We take our kids for swimming lessons at a school every Sunday and I've had men in the women's changing rooms (whose female partners think it's outrageous that they are challenged) and DH says there are sometimes women helping their kids in the men's. Nothing applies to them, it's not inappropriate etc. What an idiot.

This guy is a bloody pervert!

Whether he likes to think it or not

And yes that is bad!! It is not a sexual evolution designed to help the species

Nothing to add

Man is a total cock and a nasty bastsrd too

How did it get to this so quickly, that all the places we had free of men, now men expect to be allowed entrance.

Of course lots of men should be happy to get somewhere teenage girls are getting undressed behind often flimsy, gappy curtains.

Agree daughter is imaginary, if not he would have mentioned her in the part where he got removed by security.

Does anybody else think this guy is being ironic? Deliberately satirising the point of view of Men's Rights Activists? I find it hard to credit that he actually believes this stuff.

Just when you think it's going to end ...

"Update: I thought some more about this issue and came up with this:"

Kill me now ...

Even the piggiest misogynists tend to have a revelation when they have a daughter.

This has given me a nosebleed...😫

What an absolute cunt and I agree with Datun that his daughter is definitely fictitious.
'She's' just a plot device for his own brand of misogynistic, entitled, bollocks.

Which is what TRA/MRA are, in a nutshell and are 'legitimately' enabled to say this shite out loud, by Wokey McWoke Points.

The second 'Predator' article has actually made me feel a bit upset. It's really genuinely scary that this vile creature feels comfortable to publish his detestable thoughts. It's clear where we're heading now.

As if they were covering up their name badges, he probably didn't think to check their names so is finding a way to blame them.

Do Primark staff even wear badges? I shop in there all the time and I've never noticed them...