Challenor showing off their 'new' birth certificate

sakura mn has been very glitchy for me today too
To be fair it is an important question. Trans ideology relies on rewriting history not just for the individual but for their wider family and friends, spouse, children etc. How this has gained such widespread acceptance is beyond me (esp when it’s a spouse and to go along with it you have to effectively become ‘ homosexual’ because your husband has always been is now a woman

Sakura184 - exactly the same thing happened to me earlier. MN must be having some technical issues

People can fantasise all they want but UK law is very clear:

1 No person can ever change their natural sex.

2 A woman is a female of any age.

Oh my god my phone said it never sent . Wi report my posts to MNHQ now

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

*What about the mothers?

Will we be compelled by law to say our daughter is actually our son?

That the child we gave birth to is not the child we gave birth to?*

Another of the main reasons that I assert that Transgenderism is pure misogyny and the fact men, especially those in government, love it and support it so much is an expression of this.

Wouldn't be surprised if they just ignored the question

That would be an answer in itself.

India is sticking by India's guns. Other TRAs are furious though. Let's see how long it is before 'transitioned person becomes cis' is dogma.

Wouldn't be surprised if they just ignored the question.

FFS! So it's not enough that we aren't women anymore we are "CIS women" - now trans women are CIS women too? But calling a woman an adult human female is transphobic? Can't I just be a woman? My head is spinning!!

Littlecabbage spot on question.

not
India will now
A) delete post
B) laugh it off as a joke
C) call everyone a TERF
D) all of the above

Well done littlecabbage - there will be some scrambling going on, right now.

DBS have royally fucked this.

Just when you think things couldn't get any crazier, India Willoughby is claiming to be a 'cis' woman. twitter.com/IndiaWilloughby/status/1158364766706044936?s=19

The meanings and definitions in the trans cult are changing so fast, it makes your head spin.

If they haven't thought it through, I really despair about our country's safeguarding processes. I had always just assumed that there wouldn't be a way to hide past convictions under "previous identities".

The DBS are really trying to dodge the question, aren't they? Bet they think I'm really "transphobic" for asking .

Am watching & waiting for their answer....bet they haven’t thought this through.

Brilliant reply to their cabbage. As you say - the onus is on the applicant to disclose all previous identities and if they don't then what?