National Disability Scheme (AU) should pay for clients to access prostituted women ?

29 replies

JanesKettle · 22/07/2019 06:24

www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jul/22/we-are-sexual-beings-why-disability-advocates-want-the-ndis-to-cover-sexual-services#comment-131240151

Unbelievable.

And the comments - this should be a 'fight to the death' for people with disabilities ? Seriously ? Do people have zero ethical qualms about the use of women's bodies for the sexual gratification of (mostly) men, disabled or not ?

OP posts:

Babdoc · 22/07/2019 09:26

Nobody has a “right” to have sex. And certainly not to have taxpayers fund the abuse of women.
I’ve been widowed for 27 years - should I have demanded that taxpayers funded a male prostitute for me, along with my widow’s pension?
This all sounds like the same old male entitlement rant. They think women are a commodity, which should be provided for them to use.

OhHolyJesus · 22/07/2019 07:54

I think some men and women believe that some prostitutes have really high sex drives and genuinely enjoy having sex with lots of strangers and they get a kick out of getting paid for it.

No one has a right to sex or a right to anyone else's body. I certainly don't think that tax payers money or charities should fund this. The chances for people to take advantage are boundless.

ISaySteadyOn · 22/07/2019 06:47

Sorry, I meant of course they have no ethical qualms.

ISaySteadyOn · 22/07/2019 06:42

Of course not. Women aren't people after all. They are mere objects and costumes for male use. Or at least that's how the people in your OP probably see them.

Unflip

1 2

Swipe left for the next trending thread