Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Fascinating tweets about JY’s waxing case. Read here. (cont. thread 2)

610 replies

GirlDownUnder · 22/07/2019 01:34

Thread 1 here
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3632380-Fascinating-tweets-about-JY-s-waxing-case-Read-here-Thread-title-edited-by-MNHQ

This is a continuation of all that is JY and their waxing cases bought against minority women in Canada.

We are a fair way in, and still are no closer to knowing what the final judgment will be, but we have lots of info. and are finally seeing this case, and all the attending issues with self ID, in the public eye and main stream press.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
NotBadConsidering · 22/07/2019 06:56

What a horrible human being Oger is.

So Yaniv should not have asked women to working home alone to touch his balls, Yaniv should only have asked women working alongside other women at a place of business to touch his balls?

And Yaniv was not the right complainant? What, not woman enough for you Oger? Not stable enough to sue non-ball touching women? Need someone a bit less “out there” to force women to touch someone’s balls?

Fuck you Oger.

boatyardblues · 22/07/2019 06:35

Thanks for the new thread GirlDownUnder,

Cookieflavoredbiscuit · 22/07/2019 06:35

As for the outcome of the hearing, I'm guessing our tampon enthusiast will lose, (probably thanks to the amount of attention the case is gathering) but not for trying to make women touch balls against their will. I'll bet several slices of cake that the focus will probably be on other technicalities, and will go out of its way to emphasize that. I suspect the aptly named "Member" agrees whole-heartedly with Ogre...

Fascinating tweets about JY’s waxing case. Read here. (cont. thread 2)
Original poster
GirlDownUnder · 22/07/2019 05:07

Not related to the cases, but the lifting of the publication ban and subsequent publicity has lead to some horrifying info.

This tweeter is tweeting about her encounter with JY from 4 years ago, when she was 14 / 15 years old and she received these inappropriate messages.

The first two are voice messages from JY in an Elmo voice, the last is JY saying that he can’t wait until she’s 16 - and my reading is 16 and legal. Envy

OP posts:
Yeahnahyeah · 22/07/2019 04:59

I'm pissed the Member is allowing this leeway. Talk about bowing down Hmm
It's fucked. Fawning, obsequious on their part. Why? It's sooo farked.

miri1985 · 22/07/2019 04:27

How on earth have things gone from #metoo to being asked to touch male genitals against your will as being part of your "job" that you may not like?

If mainstream liberal feminism decides that not waxing JY is "transphobic" then they have lost all credibility with regards to womens rights, working class womens rights especially, sexual assault, unwanted dick pics etc.

There are so many other vulnerable women at stake when it comes to this ruling than just estheticians, I'm hoping this goes the right way for all of them.

If this does come down to this being a public/private service and its decided that this is a private service, I can imagine JY will go out trawling for a case involving a public service.

HirplesWithHaggis · 22/07/2019 03:49

WeirdWoman JY is indeed suing the women.

holdmybutterbeer · 22/07/2019 03:24

JY said he had collapsed then on different media had been assaulted. He is a delusionist who needs to be referred to a psychiatrist ASAP

WeirdWoman · 22/07/2019 03:05

For clarity: who is suing whom?

I initially thought that JY was suing the beauticians, but since JY seems to be the one on trial, I’m not sure?

Original poster
GirlDownUnder · 22/07/2019 02:01

Twitter reports from all the cases by Elsie

Case 1 JY vs BH. Case is JY vs Sikh woman who declined to provide genital waving services to JY

mobile.twitter.com/goinglikeelsie/status/1147905523347365888

Archive archive.is/xqu5H

Case 2 took place on July 5th. It is JY vs a Sikh lady who declined to provide arm and leg waxing to JY

mobile.twitter.com/goinglikeelsie/status/1148630107570880512

Archive
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1148630107570880512.html

Case 3 hearing took place on Wednesday, July 17, 2019. The respondent MD declined to provide genital waxing services for JY.

mobile.twitter.com/goinglikeelsie/status/1152403630974046208

On going at time of posting.

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

Join Mumsnet Log In

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.