Fascinating tweets about JY’s waxing case. Read here. (cont. thread 2)

Ok video 7. I can tell by someone commenting on it underneath. Will watch again for time stamp

Bugger it. I'm breaking my own devices at the table rule tonight. Will see if I can find.

I "think" JY doesn't understand that words have meaning. I don't know that JY has bothered to find out what intersex means, rather JY is using that term because TRAs have continued to say 'but intersex...' whenever challenged and it's always worked in the past.

A post near the end of the last thread mentioned speculation that JY's menstruation fetish might be related to jewish laws and customs. I can tell you that what we know of JYs background suggests it extremely unlikely that JY is aware of niddah and 'purity' laws (sometimes language is really clumsy). It's unlikely that learning about this formed any part of a Jewish education (it definitely isn't mainstream) and it's really not something most Jews know much about.

Sorry in the middle of dinner prep. The link to the channel was in the video of JY tribunal thread. There's about 6 videos on the channel. Sorry I can't remember which one. I'm thinking of the later ones they are numbered, perhaps 5 onwards. I will check later. God I hope it's still there, I was just so gobsmacked I didn't think to place mark.

See, I think the Member is palying good long game. Letting Yaniv do all the heavy lifting whu=ilst seming to be even handed, even sympathetic. The longer Yaniv blusters on and pratts around the mor ethere is to be seen, to be shocked at, nervously laughed at... as and when more newspapers work out how the hell they are going to cover such ludicrousness the more Peaking will occur.

Basically there is no way any man or woman on the street is going to think - Hell yes! Women who do waxing should be forced to wax men, alone, in theier homes.

The odd man who thinks it is fine just needs to be asked - including your mum, sister, wife, daughter? to be peaked.

Thanks for the new thread.

Does anyone know when these proceedings are due to conclude?Considering 90% of it is JY spouting bollocks (literally) they seem to be going on forever.

Oger's comment: a test of this difficult situation.

WTAF? What the actual fucking fuck?

There is no situation in which any woman should be required to touch the genitalia of any XY for any reason she sees fit. There's no nuance, no complexity, no difficulty.

We see you, Oger, we see you.

I watched the Waxmyballs YouTube channel where there are videos from the hearing. JY stated that MO is intersex under oath. Now not my business if MO is or isn't, but the blatant hypocrisy of JY effectively outing (for want of a better term) MO is quite appalling. Especially when JY refuses to answer questions regarding their own genitalia.

I'd imagine MO would not be very happy that this has occurred. I suspect JY could be facing their own legal action if MO was to find out 🤔😬

choked on my coffee, I did.

And what's better is they are trying so hard to distance themselves from JY, and JY just keeps chasing them round twitter.

Apologies, I laughed out loud when I read that...

boatyardblues
You've explained my issue with self ID perfectly. When we rely on "evidence" which cannot be objectively verified then we make bad law, very bad law. I can't claim my pension just because I described myself as feeling like I was 90 when I got out of bed this morning, I'm going to have to wait until the age at which I become eligible, no one thinks this is controversial.

Was feeling a bit low and that article definitely raised my spirits a wee bit.

I quite enjoyed it when the pro-TRA member accidentally said 'He, erm She' when referring to JY.

The audio and video really do need to be listened to.

That article sums up everything about this shit show

Godfrey Elfwick I think I luffs you

Quite littlebrowndog

@weirdwoman I think it's slightly more complicated. My understanding is that Yaniv sued the women, most of whom settled out of court. Any who had solicitors he backed down, suggesting vexatious litigation. The court therefore insisted these cases be heard (he had planned to drop them once solicitor involved) so whilst it is his action against the woman, he is being forced to justify himself.

spectator.us/every-woman-right-scrotum-waxed/

Well

It doesn’t matter if JY is an outlier. Once you self-ID, the legal protections and measures apply regardless of sincerity (which cannot be objectively measured) or motivation (which can be inferred from actions, but not questioned). The JY case just shows this sloppy, subjective law making up for what it is: wide open to abuse. A more measured, careful claimant wouldn’t have semaphored the logical outcome of such sloppy lawmaking out into the wider world as effectively, but it would have eventually become apparent once it inevitably harmed women, vulnerable adults and children and the casualties started piling up.

Indeed. Oger shows more of their hand than they realise with that post. Grim.