Hi BitOfFun, yes it's quite confusing, I think I've worked it out though. I'm just going from memory here (super busy day ahead so no time to back track and check) please anyone feel free to add or correct where necessary...
Here goes, TH was mentioned way back in Elsie's earlier threads under different initials. I think the initial change is to avoid confusion as possibly another respondent has the same initials? Or perhaps for TH privacy?
TH was one of the many beauticians who refused service to JY. At the threat of further action (unsure if claims court or this tribunal) TH response was basically bring it on. TH then attempt to engage lawyer after lawyer to represent her only to be refused. Eventually found a lawyer (unsure if independent lawyer or connected to group representing the current respondents) to take her case. At some point in negotiations TH lawyer advised that they intended to introduce JY internet posts into evidence (unclear if found by TH or lawyer). JY dropped the claim.
TH has been coming to the tribunal to...
Offer moral support to current respondents.
See JY finally get their long awaited comeuppance.
Get a front row seat to the unfolding shitshow.
I think it's all of the above.