Twitter wanker (literally)

Here https://www.standingforwomen.com/stickers @WelshMoth

Imagine being an autogynephile?

I've tried to wrap my head around how the sex thing works.
I think it must be a bit like being an exhibitionist. Or when people get off on filming themselves.

The regulation in question being at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/3004/regulation/20/made

Students should be able to access facilities that align with their gender or that they feel most comfortable using. This should be stated in publicly available policies.

Staff and students should be reminded to never challenge a student’s choice of facilities."

Where staff and students share multiple-occupant facilities, this violates the regulation that says that staff are entitled to single-sex loos.

Yes the video stayed. I deleted the tweet in the end, much as it enraged me. Vented by sticking TWAM stickers over half of Essex while on holiday this week.

I've been suspended for 'hateful conduct' for suggesting castration might actually be an appropriate judicial consequence for men who commit acts of illegal perversion in public places after reporting that video.

I stumbled onto a vile, racist, sexist account posting some of the most horrific garbage I've seen in a long time. Not even a question it broke Twitter rules (as well as hate laws).

Reported the account and as many tweets as I could. A couple were deleted, but the account remains live and active. Someone needs to create an alternative site, because the tech boys behind it don't give a F---.

But it never happens..

Twitter’s commitment to us, from CEO Jack Dorsey.

Yeah, cheers mate.

So did I initially but that's old hat now. They have to keep pushing the envelope. Seriously though the amount of pervs and predators twitter turns a blind eye to is mind boggling.

Dana I thought it was going to be the NSPCC man

Ugh. Not clicking the link.

My crystal ball predicts a job at the NSPCC in their future 🤢

Twitter is run by TRAs/MRAs so I'm not surprised at all by this situation.

Imagine being an autogynephile? Shudder
It must be absolutely the shittest of the shittest

I imagine most AGPs are perfectly comfortable with themselves. Most men with paraphilias are quite content with it and don't care about other people's thoughts.

I bumped into the original tweet while looking up JY stuff earlier. I will burn my hard drive later.

I was trying to go back to the tweets to check the ratios and comments because they were surprisingly heartening for GC, and hightlight exactly why women (the original kind) don’t want transwomen in our bathrooms.

The original profile name from the OP link has no content - mobile.twitter.com/abkazias

I have found a second profile for this user though - mobile.twitter.com/sloobi4
(All content is under Caution: This profile may include potentially sensitive content. So no surprises it's NSFW and is grim).

And third profile mobile.twitter.com/ZELDACR0SS

(All content is under Caution: This profile may include potentially sensitive content. So no surprises again it's NSFW and is grim).

Are multi accounts allowed? Anyway it’s def all the same person. And the third account still has the video

That t-shirt logo for MB is hilarious. Maybe with "I'm a Jeremy H*" on the back?

An aside but did anyone who complained about Mhairi Black's video get a response? I didn't.

Staff and students should be reminded to never challenge a student’s choice of facilities.

Ok. There's a right. Where are the responsibilities?

Is sexual enjoyment of/inappropriate sexual use of facilities and others in facilities an integral and necessary part of the protected characteristic?

If it isn't, how do women deal with a student who misuses their choice of facilities to exercise their sexual enjoyment?

How are equal rights to be safe and treated with respect going to be enforced? Women appear to have been told where their boundary is; what reciprocal boundary can they expect in turn?

And I know it's old fashioned, but where exactly are the facilities for the disabled/ people of faith and culture/ traumatised/ wanting basic privacy from male bodies women that they are entitled to under the EA, or is this a case of one protected group trumping others while some women are actively excluded from women's provisions? And where please is the law this is based on?

"Students should be able to access facilities that align with their gender or that they feel most comfortable using. This should be stated in publicly available policies.
Staff and students should be reminded to never challenge a student’s choice of facilities."

—Stonewall, Delivering LGBT-Inclusive Higher Education, 2019

I think this is probably the same one that turned up on my twitter timeline this morning. I was but a lot of gc women were replying or retweeting it - it's good to raise awareness. Because this is what we're talking about if we get rid of women-only spaces. People free to do this.

How is that vile vid still on twitter

Ffs

That t-shirt logo for MB is hilarious. Maybe with "I'm a Jeremy H*" on the back?

Re the not being deleted.... I saw this earlier and my first instinct was to report it. But then my second thought was - no, I want this to stand so people can see exactly why we are concerned, and exactly what type of person we're dealing with here.

Same reason I deliberately didn't report a TRA recently who was being particularly aggressive and abusive about "Terfs". Maybe other people are thinking the same too. Bring on the sunlight...