Many lesbian, bi and gay people no longer use the acronym 'lgbt(whatever)' and avoid anything with that label on it, because it has come to mean a specific political position. The position is 'queering' or 'queered' whatever - society, culture, education, which basically means any boundaries, any norms, any taboos, should be smashed. Safeguarding in particular is a norm and a boundary. Women as a concept is a norm and a boundary. This is where the pseudo intellectual drivel about 'childhood is a social construct' and 'sex is a social construct' is coming from. It makes people engage in discussion to defend it which by doing so validates that it is up for discussion and chips away at it.
It's got this far because it's largely of no interest to the average person in the street so far. But think of the howling mobs outside the courts when certain paedophiles have been on trial, and what they would have done to anyone they got hold of. And then think about what happens, demonstrated in history, when people no longer trust the law to provide justice and do it themselves.
If this group, who should have been put back in their box at the start, push this to breaking point (and they will, restraint and impulse control aren't characteristics of the leading lights of this movement) it will get very ugly.