We can now name Jonathan Yaniv

Unbefuckingleivable. “Safe and inclusive” means parents and caregivers not to be allowed? TRA tumbleweeds abound...

Priceless. The children’s caregivers were to be excluded for their own safety. You truly couldn’t make it up...

Does anyone know what event Yaniv was attending when this picture was taken?

JY has been a regular at Township of Langley, BC town council meetings, suggesting various agendas. The next one: to restart plans for a kid's swim with no caregivers allowed, which was cancelled due to public outrage.
(can't make this up)

Slightly off topic but what I cannot comprehend is that you do not need to dig too far to discover the disturbing side of this debate, or to spot some of the inherent flaws. Do the experts, law-makers and the supporters of blanket acceptance not use Google or Twitter? I don't get it.

I was trying talking to an old colleague about some of the issues recently. She asked for some links to read more and while compiling a list I googled non-binary. One of the results on the first page was to a forum made for and used by people who identify as non-binary. I had a quick skim read of a couple of threads and it was very apparent that the whole thing is based on adherence to stereotypes. If I can find that in 5 minutes without really trying, why can't the experts? As for the sexual and fetish and weird anime side, that's easy to see if you go on to Twitter. It's not hidden. It's really not.

before becoming

What is this erasing the past nonsense and how is it lawful? Even if we were to believe that a man can become a woman, are we expected to further believe that they didn’t in fact exist at all become becoming female? It’s mind blowing

I bet the TRA movement would love to divorce themselves from these antics.

Yaniv is as much a TW as any other TW. This is exactly what the ideology is. And I'm not going to say this is what self ID is, because if Yaniv lived in the UK they could get a GRC and be legally recognised in Yaniv's right to be treated as a woman. Unless there are clear legal lines held between the fact of biological sex and personal free choices of gender expression, and third spaces provided for those who prefer not to use to spaces for their biological sex, women as a sex class are under threat and this is incompatible with respect for women, equality for women, safety for women and safeguarding in general. Or preventing fetishists and abusive males preying on women, while exploiting the law to enable and validate their behaviour.

Jessica is on Canadian radio again now (after being on the same show yesterday) and the host seems to be being a bit tougher on her.

She has denied that she sent the tampon messages. I wonder if they were sent when she was Jonathon and therefore can be erased from
Her past?

Has this person left Twitter or just blocked me?
Can't find them on there.

Why if a man pretends to be a woman to abuse little girls we have to accept he is a woman?

I believe the argument is ‘because shut up, that’s why.’

He is a revolting specimen tbh. But doing wonders in peaking people. If only more press would pick up on it. Have pretty much only seen one article about him, and it was largely sympathetic. The journalist must have done a hell of a lot of work to be able to spin this into a 'poor jonathon' story

mobile.twitter.com/maitlis/status/1152107842968707072

Some of his conversations are included in this article. It really shows what a paedo creep he is:
www.thepostmillennial.com/the-truth-about-jessica-yaniv-is-beginning-to-emerge/

If a man dresses as a priest to rape little boys, we do not think he is a priest.
If a man pretends to be blind to collect disability benefits, we do not think he is blind.
If a man pretends to be a minor to chat up girls online we do not think he is a minor.
Why if a man pretends to be a woman to abuse little girls we have to accept he is a woman?

One good thing

This person can peak trans the nation in one fell swoop

"I bet the TRA movement would love to divorce themselves from these antics."
Well, they can't. "Acceptance without exception", Stonewall declared. By their own words, they cannot claim he's not genuine, because they'd be making an exception. Hoist on their own petard.

I bet the TRA movement would love to divorce themselves from these antics.

And there is the rub.
If anyone says that this person isn’t a genuine transwoman then you open Pandora’s box.
Why make an exception for this one person? I’m sure this person is not the only one to act like this. Who gets to police it? Who gets to decide?

Damn, I tried really hard not to "misgender" as I want my post to stand! Will try again.

This is Yaniv in a ladies' toilet. Yaniv appears to be looking at a young girl in the background.

Yaniv likes to engage young girls in conversations online how to deal with girls talking to Yaniv about starting their periods, randomly, in the toilet (as if any girl would approach Yaniv for advice on this). (See [[https://mirandayardley.com/en/jonathan-yaniv-is-a-predator/
Miranda's article]] for proof of this).

Has anyone else seen the delightful Yaniv’s latest Facebook video
Brain tumour? Check.
Gynae visit? Check.
Apparently severe neurological symptoms that mean complete exhaustion. Presumably, performing in court is no problem though.
There are not enough words to describe this piece of human excrement.

I watched his council video not envy
From what I remember he wasn't asked to speak, they have slots where any member of the public can speak and he took advantage of that to make an arse of himself

I generally don't comment on people's personal appearance. It's not the thing I notice first. But the photos are singularly unappealing.

Doubly I'd say.

And I'm at the context. Wtf has it got to do with Yaniv?

This image is more relevant to the court case. This is what Jonathan Yaniv looked like when Yaniv was asking women to wax balls.