Nathaniel Knight (partner of Aimee Challenor); worrying twitter admissions

What are the Lib Dems THINKING?

The Party of Lloyd-George, Jeremy Thorpe, Cyril Smith et al?

Pretty much what they've always thought.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD

I will not engage in any sexual interaction without consent from a person with a mature mind and understanding of sex.

I read that, initially, in an even creepier way - that the person giving consent for the child would be an adult.

Re furries, I can sort of see the rationale behind it. If someone believes they're very plain, they can hide inside the suit and be the glamorous sexy person they wish they were.

Jesus.

What are the Lib Dems THINKING?

It's mind boggling.

My DD played roblox, and she came to me quite upset and disturbed because she described her "online" friend "going into a room and having sex"

The internet is a paedophile's playground - they find each other, and their victims there.

NK is studying animation and video games.

Did anyone hear about the guy who used Roblox chat to groom kids and get them to do stuff for his fantasies?

Just saying.

It's so open! I remember PIE, and went to several things with Jimmy Savile as a young teen. Creepy as fuck and I ran out the room pronto.
Can't believe we are still seeing these pervs doing this shit yet again.
Been blocked by AC, and today NK? no idea why as never commented, followed them or anything, presumably terfblocker stuff because I've followed Gender free stuff?

My mum used to say ‘weird attracts weird’.

His blog is still up to date and open. It’s such a strange community, the furries. As there’s so many of them online it validates what they are doing, and his stories don’t seem as bad as many others out there, probably because they’re suggestive but not explicit like others are. Although, obviously, just because something turns you on, that doesn’t make it valid. He has a YouTube video too, where he seems very troubled and talks about himself. Most of his anime videos are from 10 years ago, so I wonder how old he is now?

Anyway, whether he’s autistic or vulnerable, we still need safeguarding about boundaries, and that’s why I hate the furries/anime online world because it’s about a fetish and trying to break down these boundaries.

If AC is horrified about what her father has done, it does seem strange to then be in a relationship with a furry who openly states their enjoyment of master/slave and captivity etc, as listed on the blog.

Who was that? Paul Thatcher?

Indeed.

PIE used to argue for the age of consent to be lowered, or even got rid of altogether. With arguments like "each child will reach maturity at a different age" and "children can enjoy sexual contact with adults".

And the infamous Peter Tatchell special, of course.

That could mean anything. A creepy person could very well convince themselves that a child is ‘mature for their age’ and offered sweeties, love or affection in return for - well rape actually.

Yep. From the tweets:

I will not engage in any sexual interaction without consent from a person with a mature mind and understanding of sex.

"They'll use the same arguments as PIE et al did in the 1970s."

Spot on WombofOnesOwn.

I too remember PIE in the 1970s. We need to keep making this point. We've been here before. This is nothing new. Nothing ever is is it? Just same old same old under a different guise.

The most determined breed on the planet - male predators.

Thank heavens for archives.
archive.li/PhxK7

I was shocked to come across this guys page on twit. Disgusting. Surely challenor, with her father in jail for being a child rapist, shouldn't be working with children while being with another of the same ilk.

I wonder who advised them to delete the tweet or if the responses guided them.

Coventry Lib Dems twitter currently blocking anyone

That's.... not unexpected I suppose. Blinkers on!

Coventry Lib Dems twitter currently blocking anyone - incl Buni who is quoted in OP - for asking if they will be investigating. Not abusive messages, note, just asking for a statement. It's possible AC is on the account, which is VERY concerning as suggests AC still doesn't understand safeguarding and is, again, trying to deflect attention within party.

I think noting that there seem to be a lot of autistics among these people is important. It's nothing to do with "get out f jail free" or reducing safeguarding. It's about understanding how people get drawn into this stuff and begin to believe it is ok, rather than taking up the taboos society has developed.

It's also important for parents and caregivers to be really aware that young people in their care could be drawn into this through accessing stuff that seems on the surface to be fine, like fan fiction or anime.

I’m not on Twitter, but maybe someone who is could retweet this to Chuka Umunna - he was happy enough to throw his lot in with the Lib Dems. He should be made publically aware so he can’t deny knowledge when this all blow up. More high profile people should be challenged on this and not allowed to pretend it’s not happening.

My meaning being that he is clearly insane and not least for expressing those thoughts on social media

The whole thing is awful but I really cannot get my head around a sane person admitting on social media that they have sexual thoughts about children. I’m genuinely just baffled.

Their relationship isn't only online though - which could explain a difference in communication capability - they have been pictured on holiday together upthread. With their third wheel.

Also autistic here btw.

Not could zebras, will. They took on AC knowing that AC had used their father, David Challenor, as election agent while said father was awaiting trial for the rape, kidnapping and torture of a 10 year old child. A crime of which the father was subsequently found guilty.

AC claims that they did not know of the charges against AC's father. However, at the time, AC was a trustee of Coventry Pride - and the trustees collectively certainly knew, because they asked DC to step down because of the pending court case. Also, AC was at the time (of the wait for trial) sharing a house with DC and AC's mother - and the mother was all over facebook and social media, campaigning to establish DC's "innocence" and calling the 10 year old victim horrendously misogynistic and abusive names. Now of course it is possible that, having vented her spleen all over social media and got it out of her system, AC's mother was then able to exercise restraint at home and not mention the upcoming court case once in front of AC. It is possible...

That's before we get onto the fact that AC and DC between them developed the terf-blocker, at the same time as DC was membership secretary for his local party, and therefore had access to a whole load of confidential information about his membership, some of whom may have been gender-critical.

The Lib Dems took on AC knowing all of this.

So it isn't could prove to be more blind it is wilfully covering our eyes and ears and singing la la la la la can't hear you blind.

One reason why the Lib Dems will never get my vote.