Agree, their point is very unclear. Women know what it's like to get denied contraception by religious healthcare professionals so I can understand what it is like to feel denied and judged and I don't wish that on anybody. But they say nothing that shows why self-id would improve health for their community (as opposed to, say, specialist services). Meanwhile self-id has already been proven to mess up safety in women's prisons where it is effectively already in practice. So even if they are right and self-id is a magic health service wand, then they are at best supporting a policy tool which has had unintended effects for female prisoners and women in refuges, and looking to export a problem to different vulnerable communities, which is just not fair.