Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

WEP debating GRA. What do you think?

32 replies

RadicalStitch · 09/07/2019 14:13

A friend received this. My sense is that it sounds like a lot of waffle:

At our last Party conference, members brought a motion on proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act 2004. The motion was debated by members and referred back to committees for further consideration. The Policy and Steering Committees have since then been discussing the best way to take this work forward, and we wanted to keep you up to date with those plans.

Together we have agreed a framework for engaging as many members as possible in a constructive discussion. The aim is to create a space in which members can work towards agreement on both the challenges and solutions. We want to set the standard for other political parties and organisations and show that this can be done in a way that unites rather than divides.

The Policy Committee has undertaken considerable research into the most appropriate methods of achieving agreement on difficult and potentially polarising subjects. It found that the most inclusive and effective method of reaching such agreement is by employing a form of assembly as was done in Ireland to enable the discussion of subjects that divide the community. Find out more about the citizen's assembly in Ireland.

In our case, this assembly will consist of Party members and experts in sex- and gender-based protections because we want to ensure that we hear from the broadest possible range of expertise and lived experience, balanced with time and resources available.

There will be four key stages to our consultation and members will be involved at every stage:

  1. SCOPING EXERCISE

This will look at the focus of the members' assembly and its design. WE aim for a gold standard in this. Ireland’s citizen’s assembly consisted of 99 members, drawn randomly from across the whole population. WE have to find a model that ensures we hear from the broadest possible range of expertise and lived experience.

  1. MEMBERS' ASSEMBLY

Its constitution will be recommended by the scoping exercise and is likely to include people randomly selected from our membership and together with additional panellists and witnesses.

  1. MEMBER CONSULTATION

This will be an online consultation, which all members can participate in to make their voices heard.

  1. REVIEW BY POLICY COMMITTEE

This will review the outcome of the consultation and recommend next steps for the Party, which could include proposed changes to Party policy.

WE will begin work on the scoping exercise this autumn and the time-frame for the assembly and consultation will be agreed by the Steering Committee based on operational and strategic priorities. This work is vital, but as a small party we also have to balance our limited resources against a number of competing priorities - in particular any snap General Election. Our priority is to deliver an effective consultation rather than a rushed one.

We very much hope that you will participate in the consultation and in the meantime you can contact us with any questions about the framework we have set out here by replying to this email.

Best wishes,

Steering and Policy Committee members
Women's Equality Party
www.womensequality.org.uk/

OP posts:
Manderleyagain · 09/07/2019 16:16

I don't think I received this. Will have to look into it. I will want to take part in the online consultation.

I don't think it is too woolly. Its quite positive except as people say, it will depend on who is selected to take part, especially the experts. I also hope they will publish a breakdown of what the membership said.
It's the timing though isn't it. By the time they formulate a response the Scottish consultation mark 2 could well be over, and the Westminster one is already well in the past.

arranbubonicplague · 09/07/2019 14:56

experts in sex based protection

Much will depend on what/who they mean by this.

MockerstheFeManist · 09/07/2019 14:50

That long-winded statement absolutely stinks of looking for a ladder to climb down.

ByGrabtharsHammarWhatASaving · 09/07/2019 14:46

I've been doing a lot of research into different parties recently with a view to joining one. I don't want to just keep spoiling my ballots as that doesn't change anything, and I'd like to join a party that is willing to take concerns seriously even if they don't necessarily agree. After that libdem webchat they can fuck aaaaaaaall the way off, and although I love a lot of the green party policies the way they've hounded members away for raising questions about competing rights (GC women removed from meetings, religious members thrown out for questioning the intersection of rights between belief and sexuality) is disgraceful. No matter what my personal feelings are on any given subject I don't agree that any protected characteristic trumps another. They're a hairs breadth away from holding witch trials as far as I can see. Will give the WEP another look though if they're prepared to be reasonable about discussing conflicting views.

Procrastinator2 · 09/07/2019 14:38

From what I remember the legal experts who were to speak at the last conference were on the TRA side.

GassyAss · 09/07/2019 14:30

This is good news. I left their party due to their TWAW stance and told them so. If others have done the same, it shows that they are listening.

YogaDrone · 09/07/2019 14:26

I got this email too. It is very woolly. I had been trying to work out how to leave the WE but now I think I'll stay so that I can participate in the consultation., after all, it is why I joined

One small positive is that they do at least say that they will be including experts in sex based protection in their assembly.

Swipe left for the next trending thread