Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Y chromosome

241 replies

Watchfulwaiter · 08/07/2019 21:47

To avoid current derail of thread about Dr Em

OP posts:
DecomposingComposers · 09/07/2019 15:35

She wrote how interesting it was that men had a vested interest in making sure this didn't become public knowledge.

Grin
golgiapparatus · 09/07/2019 15:29

All a load of bobbins. Smashing phrase.

TheFallenMadonna · 09/07/2019 15:25

Superiority to someone with pretty much...

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 09/07/2019 15:24

Sorry Sakura this is just plain bobbins

And as I’ve said, it reminds me uncomfortably of scientific racism. I’m out

TheFallenMadonna · 09/07/2019 15:24

As one of my Xs in each cell is largely inactive anyway, I'm not sure I feel any superiority with pretty much the same X dosage. But maybe that's just the female socialisation talking...

TeaEnjoyingRadiantFeminist · 09/07/2019 15:22

Sakura so I'm clear, are you saying that a bit like the 'selfish gene', we actually need to beware the 'inadequate chromosome' and realise that the patriarchy is based on men having a sex-based inferiority complex due to some sort of internal sense of Y chromosome shame/ X chromosome envy?

sakura184 · 09/07/2019 15:20

It's almost like all men's talk, codified into laws and religions and literature and medicine , about their innate superiority over women
, was all along a huge deflection

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 09/07/2019 15:19

But when did men stop evolving? Confused

sakura184 · 09/07/2019 15:17

Nope it was just a fascinating discovery for women, who had been told for millennia that they were definitely inferior to men. To find that , biologically, we are definitely not inferior after all, far from it, was a revelation.

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 09/07/2019 15:15

I’m reading Angela Saini’s Superior and I must say this conversation does feel like it has echoes of scientific racism

GottaGetUp · 09/07/2019 15:14

.

Y chromosome
TheFallenMadonna · 09/07/2019 15:14

I know the points been made, but...

"the whole point of having Y people is so that females can evolve. Ys, however, don't evolve themselves"

"The whole point of males is so that females evolve from generation to generation. Males themselves, however, not only do not evolve, but actually do the opposite and "become more streamlined" with each generation"

...these posts would suggest you haven't taken that in.

I'm leaving "evolve from generation to generation" to one side...

Goosefoot · 09/07/2019 15:13

This is the most bizarre thread ever. It seems to be a pretty blatant attempt to construct a biological justification to say that women are genetically superior to men. Nasty stuff.

golgiapparatus · 09/07/2019 15:12

They aren't just XY they are 44 + XY. Not random derail, salient point. Since they will experience variation in the 44 as well as the sex chromosomes. You don't seem to grasp this.

sakura184 · 09/07/2019 15:11

You talk as if all Y chromosomes are simultaneously mutating in the same way and one day will all accumulate so many mutations that all men will suddenly disappear in a Thanos click.

I think they're on their way out, yes, but I'm sure it's a process that takes probably millions of years , I have no idea. I doubt the planet has got much longer so we'll all be dead before that happens anyway

sakura184 · 09/07/2019 15:09

No I know men are XY, I don't think they're just a Y. Random derail again

GottaGetUp · 09/07/2019 15:09

But any mutation in an individual Y chromosome which is deleterious to the extent that it is incompatible with life will lead to an unsuccessful pregnancy, and any that is deleterious to the extent that it is incompatible with reproduction will not be passed on. Leaving all the other non-mutated Y chromosomes to continue human reproduction.

You talk as if all Y chromosomes are simultaneously mutating in the same way and one day will all accumulate so many mutations that all men will suddenly disappear in a Thanos click.

sakura184 · 09/07/2019 15:08

So are you suggesting sakura184 that at some point human males have stopped evolving?

Yes

golgiapparatus · 09/07/2019 15:07

The number for genes does not indicate biological relevance. It's what the genes code for and how they are expressed that matters.

golgiapparatus · 09/07/2019 15:06

All DNA can repair and we have enzymes that specifically do just that.

I will echo what others have said, you seem to be mistakenly assuming that the Y contains all the genetic material in a man. Which is doesn't.

When it does contain is the SRY region which drives the production of the Male phenotype. Presence of a Y equates to the production of a Male phenotype (so long as there is no other DSD) butbit doesn't hold all the genetic variation of males.

Really, you should read some basic biology.

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 09/07/2019 15:05

Very much from a lay persons point of view, I'm completely certain that at some point human males were able to evolve, due to the fact that I'm not married to a primate

I'd also suggest that the fact that the variation in appearance among humans being as wide among males as females, shows that too

So are you suggesting sakura184 that at some point human males have stopped evolving?

sakura184 · 09/07/2019 15:03

the Y chromosome actually constitutes a very small fraction of the genetic material in any male human (or dude if you prefer).

Yes that's been covered below. The Y doesn't have many genes at all

sakura184 · 09/07/2019 15:01

God no I totally agree with you that mutations can be beneficial in nature.

But that's not what she's talking about here.

TheFallenMadonna · 09/07/2019 15:01

You are repeatedly conflating the Y chromosome with "male", but the Y chromosome actually constitutes a very small fraction of the genetic material in any male human (or dude if you prefer).

sakura184 · 09/07/2019 15:00

She makes it clear that when she talks about mutations she's talking about the inability of the Y to repair itself.

Nobody is talking about beneficial mutations, which is a random derail